[why]
Both, Ubuntu and Ubuntu Mono link to the #Ubuntu preview on
ProgrammingFonts.org. But that ends up in Ubuntu Mono. You can not
preview the proportional version.
[note]
This commit must be synched to branch gh-pages manually.
Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
[why]
With commits
ef8c12e28 Document and update cheat sheet data
bcef53dad Update cheat sheet
the README has not been updated, and i_cod.sh is still
listed as 'not existing'.
Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
[why]
The script is not running with current (i.e. year 2022) release versions
of Inkscape.
The script does not warn if a font is not installed (and creates a
garbage preview instead).
[how]
Rewrite the script that is uses Inkscape actions instead of verbs. Verbs
are already removed in Inkscape HEAD.
Check if needed font is indeed installed.
Do not generate useless Symbols Only font preview (it needs a specific
different one, I suppose).
Disable `svgo`. Maybe we should generate PNGs instead?
Change path for created images, so that it is already correct for the
gh-pages and we could use the github-pages-deploy-action to publish them.
Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
[why]
Codicons is completely missing...
[how]
After creating a stub file for Codicons, use _their_ definition file:
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/vscode-codicons/main/dist/codicon.csv
cat codicon.csv | tail -n +2 | sort -k 3 -t ',' | sed -E "s/([^,]*),([^,]*),(.*)/i='\2' i_cod_\1=\$i/" | tr '-' '_' >> i_cod.sh
Because they have new additional icons remove some lines in the bottom.
And add the final `unset i`.
I still have not figured out how the cheat sheet works and how we get
the data into that... There is a `generate-css.sh`. Hmm.
Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
[why]
Lilex is missing from the 2.2.0 RC and is not automagically patched.
[how]
Add Lilex to the font metadata database :->
[note]
Lilex's licence has no RFN given.
Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
[why]
Before Font Logos 1.0.0 there was no stable-codepoint guarantee, and the
later revisions (0.18) reassigned the codepoints. That makes updating
for us very hard, because we would have to resort the icons or follow
the codepoint changes.
With 1.0.0 this changed. That new major release introduced not only a
codepoint guarantee, but it also shifted the codepoints from the F100
region to the F300 region, where we put them anyhow (in most cases).
That is one subset less with 'dynamic base codepoint'.
The reassignment of codepoints in Font Logos kept the codepoints stable
for the icons we already have in release 2.1.0. But at the moment the
2.2.0 Release Candidate (which updated Font Logos with commit 557b8da)
have added glyphs, which are on different points as compared with the
Font Logos 1.0.0 release.
What I want to say, we need to get this straight, before our 2.2.0 RC
turns into a Release 2.2.0.
Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
