You've already forked golang-saas-starter-kit
mirror of
https://github.com/raseels-repos/golang-saas-starter-kit.git
synced 2025-06-19 00:27:42 +02:00
Splitting our users and accounts, creating new user_account package
This commit is contained in:
Lee Brown
732
example-project/internal/user_account/user_account_test.go
Normal file
732
example-project/internal/user_account/user_account_test.go
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,732 @@
|
||||
package user
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"github.com/lib/pq"
|
||||
"math/rand"
|
||||
"strings"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
"time"
|
||||
|
||||
"geeks-accelerator/oss/saas-starter-kit/example-project/internal/platform/auth"
|
||||
"geeks-accelerator/oss/saas-starter-kit/example-project/internal/platform/tests"
|
||||
"github.com/dgrijalva/jwt-go"
|
||||
"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp"
|
||||
"github.com/huandu/go-sqlbuilder"
|
||||
"github.com/pborman/uuid"
|
||||
"github.com/pkg/errors"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// TestAccountFindRequestQuery validates accountFindRequestQuery
|
||||
func TestAccountFindRequestQuery(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
where := "account_id = ? or user_id = ?"
|
||||
var (
|
||||
limit uint = 12
|
||||
offset uint = 34
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
req := UserAccountFindRequest{
|
||||
Where: &where,
|
||||
Args: []interface{}{
|
||||
"xy7",
|
||||
"qwert",
|
||||
},
|
||||
Order: []string{
|
||||
"id asc",
|
||||
"created_at desc",
|
||||
},
|
||||
Limit: &limit,
|
||||
Offset: &offset,
|
||||
}
|
||||
expected := "SELECT " + usersAccountsMapColumns + " FROM " + userAccountTableName + " WHERE (account_id = ? or user_id = ?) ORDER BY id asc, created_at desc LIMIT 12 OFFSET 34"
|
||||
|
||||
res, args := userAccountFindRequestQuery(req)
|
||||
|
||||
if diff := cmp.Diff(res.String(), expected); diff != "" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tExpected result query to match. Diff:\n%s", tests.Failed, diff)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if diff := cmp.Diff(args, req.Args); diff != "" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tExpected result query to match. Diff:\n%s", tests.Failed, diff)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestApplyClaimsUserAccountSelect validates applyClaimsUserAccountSelect
|
||||
func TestApplyClaimsUserAccountSelect(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
var claimTests = []struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
claims auth.Claims
|
||||
expectedSql string
|
||||
error error
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{"EmptyClaims",
|
||||
auth.Claims{},
|
||||
"SELECT " + usersAccountsMapColumns + " FROM " + userAccountTableName,
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{"RoleUser",
|
||||
auth.Claims{
|
||||
Roles: []string{auth.RoleUser},
|
||||
StandardClaims: jwt.StandardClaims{
|
||||
Subject: "user1",
|
||||
Audience: "acc1",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"SELECT " + usersAccountsMapColumns + " FROM " + userAccountTableName + " WHERE user_id IN (SELECT user_id FROM " + userAccountTableName + " WHERE (account_id = 'acc1' OR user_id = 'user1'))",
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{"RoleAdmin",
|
||||
auth.Claims{
|
||||
Roles: []string{auth.RoleAdmin},
|
||||
StandardClaims: jwt.StandardClaims{
|
||||
Subject: "user1",
|
||||
Audience: "acc1",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"SELECT " + usersAccountsMapColumns + " FROM " + userAccountTableName + " WHERE user_id IN (SELECT user_id FROM " + userAccountTableName + " WHERE (account_id = 'acc1' OR user_id = 'user1'))",
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
t.Log("Given the need to validate ACLs are enforced by claims to a select query.")
|
||||
{
|
||||
for i, tt := range claimTests {
|
||||
t.Logf("\tTest: %d\tWhen running test: %s", i, tt.name)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ctx := tests.Context()
|
||||
|
||||
query := userAccountSelectQuery()
|
||||
|
||||
err := applyClaimsUserAccountSelect(ctx, tt.claims, query)
|
||||
if err != tt.error {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tWant: %+v", tt.error)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tapplyClaimsUserAccountSelect failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
sql, args := query.Build()
|
||||
|
||||
// Use mysql flavor so placeholders will get replaced for comparison.
|
||||
sql, err = sqlbuilder.MySQL.Interpolate(sql, args)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Log("\t\tGot :", err)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tapplyClaimsUserAccountSelect failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if diff := cmp.Diff(sql, tt.expectedSql); diff != "" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tExpected result query to match. Diff:\n%s", tests.Failed, diff)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
t.Logf("\t%s\tapplyClaimsUserAccountSelect ok.", tests.Success)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestAddAccountValidation ensures all the validation tags work on account add.
|
||||
func TestAddAccountValidation(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
invalidRole := UserAccountRole("moon")
|
||||
invalidStatus := UserAccountStatus("moon")
|
||||
|
||||
var accountTests = []struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
req AddAccountRequest
|
||||
expected func(req AddAccountRequest, res *UserAccount) *UserAccount
|
||||
error error
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{"Required Fields",
|
||||
AddAccountRequest{},
|
||||
func(req AddAccountRequest, res *UserAccount) *UserAccount {
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
},
|
||||
errors.New("Key: 'AddAccountRequest.UserID' Error:Field validation for 'UserID' failed on the 'required' tag\n" +
|
||||
"Key: 'AddAccountRequest.AccountID' Error:Field validation for 'AccountID' failed on the 'required' tag\n" +
|
||||
"Key: 'AddAccountRequest.Roles' Error:Field validation for 'Roles' failed on the 'required' tag"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
{"Valid Role",
|
||||
AddAccountRequest{
|
||||
UserID: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
AccountID: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
Roles: []UserAccountRole{invalidRole},
|
||||
},
|
||||
func(req AddAccountRequest, res *UserAccount) *UserAccount {
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
},
|
||||
errors.New("Key: 'AddAccountRequest.Roles[0]' Error:Field validation for 'Roles[0]' failed on the 'oneof' tag"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
{"Valid Status",
|
||||
AddAccountRequest{
|
||||
UserID: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
AccountID: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
Roles: []UserAccountRole{UserAccountRole_User},
|
||||
Status: &invalidStatus,
|
||||
},
|
||||
func(req AddAccountRequest, res *UserAccount) *UserAccount {
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
},
|
||||
errors.New("Key: 'AddAccountRequest.Status' Error:Field validation for 'Status' failed on the 'oneof' tag"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
{"Default Status",
|
||||
AddAccountRequest{
|
||||
UserID: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
AccountID: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
Roles: []UserAccountRole{UserAccountRole_User},
|
||||
},
|
||||
func(req AddAccountRequest, res *UserAccount) *UserAccount {
|
||||
return &UserAccount{
|
||||
UserID: req.UserID,
|
||||
AccountID: req.AccountID,
|
||||
Roles: req.Roles,
|
||||
Status: UserAccountStatus_Active,
|
||||
|
||||
// Copy this fields from the result.
|
||||
ID: res.ID,
|
||||
CreatedAt: res.CreatedAt,
|
||||
UpdatedAt: res.UpdatedAt,
|
||||
//ArchivedAt: nil,
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
now := time.Date(2018, time.October, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
|
||||
|
||||
t.Log("Given the need ensure all validation tags are working for add account.")
|
||||
{
|
||||
for i, tt := range accountTests {
|
||||
t.Logf("\tTest: %d\tWhen running test: %s", i, tt.name)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ctx := tests.Context()
|
||||
|
||||
res, err := AddAccount(ctx, auth.Claims{}, test.MasterDB, tt.req, now)
|
||||
if err != tt.error {
|
||||
// TODO: need a better way to handle validation errors as they are
|
||||
// of type interface validator.ValidationErrorsTranslations
|
||||
var errStr string
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
errStr = err.Error()
|
||||
}
|
||||
var expectStr string
|
||||
if tt.error != nil {
|
||||
expectStr = tt.error.Error()
|
||||
}
|
||||
if errStr != expectStr {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tWant: %+v", tt.error)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tAddAccount failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If there was an error that was expected, then don't go any further
|
||||
if tt.error != nil {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t%s\tAddAccount ok.", tests.Success)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
expected := tt.expected(tt.req, res)
|
||||
if diff := cmp.Diff(res, expected); diff != "" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tAddAccount result should match. Diff:\n%s", tests.Failed, diff)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
t.Logf("\t%s\tAddAccount ok.", tests.Success)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestAddAccountExistingEntry validates emails must be unique on add account.
|
||||
func TestAddAccountExistingEntry(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
now := time.Date(2018, time.October, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
|
||||
|
||||
t.Log("Given the need ensure duplicate entries for the same user ID + account ID are updated and does not throw a duplicate key error.")
|
||||
{
|
||||
ctx := tests.Context()
|
||||
|
||||
req1 := AddAccountRequest{
|
||||
UserID: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
AccountID: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
Roles: []UserAccountRole{UserAccountRole_User},
|
||||
}
|
||||
ua1, err := AddAccount(ctx, auth.Claims{}, test.MasterDB, req1, now)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Log("\t\tGot :", err)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tAddAccount failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if diff := cmp.Diff(ua1.Roles, req1.Roles); diff != "" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tAddAccount roles should match request. Diff:\n%s", tests.Failed, diff)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
req2 := AddAccountRequest{
|
||||
UserID: req1.UserID,
|
||||
AccountID: req1.AccountID,
|
||||
Roles: []UserAccountRole{UserAccountRole_Admin},
|
||||
}
|
||||
ua2, err := AddAccount(ctx, auth.Claims{}, test.MasterDB, req2, now)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Log("\t\tGot :", err)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tAddAccount failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if diff := cmp.Diff(ua2.Roles, req2.Roles); diff != "" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tAddAccount roles should match request. Diff:\n%s", tests.Failed, diff)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
t.Logf("\t%s\tAddAccount ok.", tests.Success)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestUpdateAccountValidation ensures all the validation tags work on account update.
|
||||
func TestUpdateAccountValidation(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
invalidRole := UserAccountRole("moon")
|
||||
invalidStatus := UserAccountStatus("xxxxxxxxx")
|
||||
|
||||
var accountTests = []struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
req UpdateAccountRequest
|
||||
error error
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{"Required Fields",
|
||||
UpdateAccountRequest{},
|
||||
errors.New("Key: 'UpdateAccountRequest.UserID' Error:Field validation for 'UserID' failed on the 'required' tag\n" +
|
||||
"Key: 'UpdateAccountRequest.AccountID' Error:Field validation for 'AccountID' failed on the 'required' tag\n" +
|
||||
"Key: 'UpdateAccountRequest.Roles' Error:Field validation for 'Roles' failed on the 'required' tag"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
{"Valid Role",
|
||||
UpdateAccountRequest{
|
||||
UserID: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
AccountID: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
Roles: &UserAccountRoles{invalidRole},
|
||||
},
|
||||
errors.New("Key: 'UpdateAccountRequest.Roles[0]' Error:Field validation for 'Roles[0]' failed on the 'oneof' tag"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
{"Valid Status",
|
||||
UpdateAccountRequest{
|
||||
UserID: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
AccountID: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
Roles: &UserAccountRoles{UserAccountRole_User},
|
||||
Status: &invalidStatus,
|
||||
},
|
||||
errors.New("Key: 'UpdateAccountRequest.Status' Error:Field validation for 'Status' failed on the 'oneof' tag"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
now := time.Date(2018, time.October, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
|
||||
|
||||
t.Log("Given the need ensure all validation tags are working for update account.")
|
||||
{
|
||||
for i, tt := range accountTests {
|
||||
t.Logf("\tTest: %d\tWhen running test: %s", i, tt.name)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ctx := tests.Context()
|
||||
|
||||
err := UpdateAccount(ctx, auth.Claims{}, test.MasterDB, tt.req, now)
|
||||
if err != tt.error {
|
||||
// TODO: need a better way to handle validation errors as they are
|
||||
// of type interface validator.ValidationErrorsTranslations
|
||||
var errStr string
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
errStr = err.Error()
|
||||
}
|
||||
var expectStr string
|
||||
if tt.error != nil {
|
||||
expectStr = tt.error.Error()
|
||||
}
|
||||
if errStr != expectStr {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tWant: %+v", tt.error)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tUpdateAccount failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If there was an error that was expected, then don't go any further
|
||||
if tt.error != nil {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t%s\tUpdateAccount ok.", tests.Success)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
t.Logf("\t%s\tUpdateAccount ok.", tests.Success)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestAccountCrud validates the full set of CRUD operations for user accounts and
|
||||
// ensures ACLs are correctly applied by claims.
|
||||
func TestAccountCrud(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
defer tests.Recover(t)
|
||||
|
||||
type accountTest struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
claims func(string, string) auth.Claims
|
||||
updateErr error
|
||||
findErr error
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var accountTests []accountTest
|
||||
|
||||
// Internal request, should bypass ACL.
|
||||
accountTests = append(accountTests, accountTest{"EmptyClaims",
|
||||
func(userID, accountId string) auth.Claims {
|
||||
return auth.Claims{}
|
||||
},
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Role of user but claim user does not match update user so forbidden.
|
||||
accountTests = append(accountTests, accountTest{"RoleUserDiffUser",
|
||||
func(userID, accountId string) auth.Claims {
|
||||
return auth.Claims{
|
||||
Roles: []string{auth.RoleUser},
|
||||
StandardClaims: jwt.StandardClaims{
|
||||
Subject: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
Audience: accountId,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
ErrForbidden,
|
||||
ErrNotFound,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Role of user AND claim user matches update user so OK.
|
||||
accountTests = append(accountTests, accountTest{"RoleUserSameUser",
|
||||
func(userID, accountId string) auth.Claims {
|
||||
return auth.Claims{
|
||||
Roles: []string{auth.RoleUser},
|
||||
StandardClaims: jwt.StandardClaims{
|
||||
Subject: userID,
|
||||
Audience: accountId,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Role of admin but claim account does not match update user so forbidden.
|
||||
accountTests = append(accountTests, accountTest{"RoleAdminDiffUser",
|
||||
func(userID, accountId string) auth.Claims {
|
||||
return auth.Claims{
|
||||
Roles: []string{auth.RoleAdmin},
|
||||
StandardClaims: jwt.StandardClaims{
|
||||
Subject: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
Audience: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
ErrForbidden,
|
||||
ErrNotFound,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Role of admin and claim account matches update user so ok.
|
||||
accountTests = append(accountTests, accountTest{"RoleAdminSameAccount",
|
||||
func(userID, accountId string) auth.Claims {
|
||||
return auth.Claims{
|
||||
Roles: []string{auth.RoleAdmin},
|
||||
StandardClaims: jwt.StandardClaims{
|
||||
Subject: uuid.NewRandom().String(),
|
||||
Audience: accountId,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Log("Given the need to validate CRUD functionality for user accounts and ensure claims are applied as ACL.")
|
||||
{
|
||||
now := time.Date(2018, time.October, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
|
||||
|
||||
for i, tt := range accountTests {
|
||||
t.Logf("\tTest: %d\tWhen running test: %s", i, tt.name)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Always create the new user with empty claims, testing claims for create user
|
||||
// will be handled separately.
|
||||
user, err := Create(tests.Context(), auth.Claims{}, test.MasterDB, CreateUserRequest{
|
||||
Name: "Lee Brown",
|
||||
Email: uuid.NewRandom().String() + "@geeksinthewoods.com",
|
||||
Password: "akTechFr0n!ier",
|
||||
PasswordConfirm: "akTechFr0n!ier",
|
||||
}, now)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Log("\t\tGot :", err)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tCreate user failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Create a new random account and associate that with the user.
|
||||
accountID := uuid.NewRandom().String()
|
||||
createReq := AddAccountRequest{
|
||||
UserID: user.ID,
|
||||
AccountID: accountID,
|
||||
Roles: []UserAccountRole{UserAccountRole_User},
|
||||
}
|
||||
ua, err := AddAccount(tests.Context(), tt.claims(user.ID, accountID), test.MasterDB, createReq, now)
|
||||
if err != nil && errors.Cause(err) != tt.updateErr {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tWant: %+v", tt.updateErr)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tUpdateAccount failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
} else if tt.updateErr == nil {
|
||||
if diff := cmp.Diff(ua.Roles, createReq.Roles); diff != "" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tExpected find result to match update. Diff:\n%s", tests.Failed, diff)
|
||||
}
|
||||
t.Logf("\t%s\tAddAccount ok.", tests.Success)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Update the account.
|
||||
updateReq := UpdateAccountRequest{
|
||||
UserID: user.ID,
|
||||
AccountID: accountID,
|
||||
Roles: &UserAccountRoles{UserAccountRole_Admin},
|
||||
}
|
||||
err = UpdateAccount(tests.Context(), tt.claims(user.ID, accountID), test.MasterDB, updateReq, now)
|
||||
if err != nil && errors.Cause(err) != tt.updateErr {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tWant: %+v", tt.updateErr)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tUpdateAccount failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
t.Logf("\t%s\tUpdateAccount ok.", tests.Success)
|
||||
|
||||
// Find the account for the user to verify the updates where made. There should only
|
||||
// be one account associated with the user for this test.
|
||||
findRes, err := FindAccountsByUserID(tests.Context(), tt.claims(user.ID, accountID), test.MasterDB, user.ID, false)
|
||||
if err != nil && errors.Cause(err) != tt.findErr {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tWant: %+v", tt.findErr)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tVerify UpdateAccount failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
} else if tt.findErr == nil {
|
||||
expected := []*UserAccount{
|
||||
&UserAccount{
|
||||
ID: ua.ID,
|
||||
UserID: ua.UserID,
|
||||
AccountID: ua.AccountID,
|
||||
Roles: *updateReq.Roles,
|
||||
Status: ua.Status,
|
||||
CreatedAt: ua.CreatedAt,
|
||||
UpdatedAt: now,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
if diff := cmp.Diff(findRes, expected); diff != "" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tExpected find result to match update. Diff:\n%s", tests.Failed, diff)
|
||||
}
|
||||
t.Logf("\t%s\tVerify UpdateAccount ok.", tests.Success)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Archive (soft-delete) the user account.
|
||||
err = RemoveAccount(tests.Context(), tt.claims(user.ID, accountID), test.MasterDB, RemoveAccountRequest{
|
||||
UserID: user.ID,
|
||||
AccountID: accountID,
|
||||
}, now)
|
||||
if err != nil && errors.Cause(err) != tt.updateErr {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tWant: %+v", tt.updateErr)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tRemoveAccount failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
} else if tt.updateErr == nil {
|
||||
// Trying to find the archived user with the includeArchived false should result in not found.
|
||||
_, err = FindAccountsByUserID(tests.Context(), tt.claims(user.ID, accountID), test.MasterDB, user.ID, false)
|
||||
if errors.Cause(err) != ErrNotFound {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tWant: %+v", ErrNotFound)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tVerify RemoveAccount failed when excluding archived.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Trying to find the archived user with the includeArchived true should result no error.
|
||||
findRes, err = FindAccountsByUserID(tests.Context(), tt.claims(user.ID, accountID), test.MasterDB, user.ID, true)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tVerify RemoveAccount failed when including archived.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
expected := []*UserAccount{
|
||||
&UserAccount{
|
||||
ID: ua.ID,
|
||||
UserID: ua.UserID,
|
||||
AccountID: ua.AccountID,
|
||||
Roles: *updateReq.Roles,
|
||||
Status: ua.Status,
|
||||
CreatedAt: ua.CreatedAt,
|
||||
UpdatedAt: now,
|
||||
ArchivedAt: pq.NullTime{Time: now, Valid: true},
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
if diff := cmp.Diff(findRes, expected); diff != "" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tExpected find result to be archived. Diff:\n%s", tests.Failed, diff)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
t.Logf("\t%s\tRemoveAccount ok.", tests.Success)
|
||||
|
||||
// Delete (hard-delete) the user account.
|
||||
err = DeleteAccount(tests.Context(), tt.claims(user.ID, accountID), test.MasterDB, DeleteAccountRequest{
|
||||
UserID: user.ID,
|
||||
AccountID: accountID,
|
||||
})
|
||||
if err != nil && errors.Cause(err) != tt.updateErr {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tWant: %+v", tt.updateErr)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tDeleteAccount failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
} else if tt.updateErr == nil {
|
||||
// Trying to find the deleted user with the includeArchived true should result in not found.
|
||||
_, err = FindAccountsByUserID(tests.Context(), tt.claims(user.ID, accountID), test.MasterDB, user.ID, true)
|
||||
if errors.Cause(err) != ErrNotFound {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tWant: %+v", ErrNotFound)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tVerify DeleteAccount failed when including archived.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
t.Logf("\t%s\tDeleteAccount ok.", tests.Success)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestAccountFind validates all the request params are correctly parsed into a select query.
|
||||
func TestAccountFind(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
now := time.Now().Add(time.Hour * -2).UTC()
|
||||
|
||||
startTime := now.Truncate(time.Millisecond)
|
||||
var endTime time.Time
|
||||
|
||||
var userAccounts []*UserAccount
|
||||
for i := 0; i <= 4; i++ {
|
||||
user, err := Create(tests.Context(), auth.Claims{}, test.MasterDB, CreateUserRequest{
|
||||
Name: "Lee Brown",
|
||||
Email: uuid.NewRandom().String() + "@geeksinthewoods.com",
|
||||
Password: "akTechFr0n!ier",
|
||||
PasswordConfirm: "akTechFr0n!ier",
|
||||
}, now.Add(time.Second*time.Duration(i)))
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tCreate user failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Create a new random account and associate that with the user.
|
||||
accountID := uuid.NewRandom().String()
|
||||
ua, err := AddAccount(tests.Context(), auth.Claims{}, test.MasterDB, AddAccountRequest{
|
||||
UserID: user.ID,
|
||||
AccountID: accountID,
|
||||
Roles: []UserAccountRole{UserAccountRole_User},
|
||||
}, now.Add(time.Second*time.Duration(i)))
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tAdd account failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
userAccounts = append(userAccounts, ua)
|
||||
endTime = user.CreatedAt
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type accountTest struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
req UserAccountFindRequest
|
||||
expected []*UserAccount
|
||||
error error
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var accountTests []accountTest
|
||||
|
||||
createdFilter := "created_at BETWEEN ? AND ?"
|
||||
|
||||
// Test sort users.
|
||||
accountTests = append(accountTests, accountTest{"Find all order by created_at asx",
|
||||
UserAccountFindRequest{
|
||||
Where: &createdFilter,
|
||||
Args: []interface{}{startTime, endTime},
|
||||
Order: []string{"created_at"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
userAccounts,
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Test reverse sorted user accounts.
|
||||
var expected []*UserAccount
|
||||
for i := len(userAccounts) - 1; i >= 0; i-- {
|
||||
expected = append(expected, userAccounts[i])
|
||||
}
|
||||
accountTests = append(accountTests, accountTest{"Find all order by created_at desc",
|
||||
UserAccountFindRequest{
|
||||
Where: &createdFilter,
|
||||
Args: []interface{}{startTime, endTime},
|
||||
Order: []string{"created_at desc"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
expected,
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Test limit.
|
||||
var limit uint = 2
|
||||
accountTests = append(accountTests, accountTest{"Find limit",
|
||||
UserAccountFindRequest{
|
||||
Where: &createdFilter,
|
||||
Args: []interface{}{startTime, endTime},
|
||||
Order: []string{"created_at"},
|
||||
Limit: &limit,
|
||||
},
|
||||
userAccounts[0:2],
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Test offset.
|
||||
var offset uint = 3
|
||||
accountTests = append(accountTests, accountTest{"Find limit, offset",
|
||||
UserAccountFindRequest{
|
||||
Where: &createdFilter,
|
||||
Args: []interface{}{startTime, endTime},
|
||||
Order: []string{"created_at"},
|
||||
Limit: &limit,
|
||||
Offset: &offset,
|
||||
},
|
||||
userAccounts[3:5],
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Test where filter.
|
||||
whereParts := []string{}
|
||||
whereArgs := []interface{}{startTime, endTime}
|
||||
expected = []*UserAccount{}
|
||||
for i := 0; i <= len(userAccounts); i++ {
|
||||
if rand.Intn(100) < 50 {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
ua := *userAccounts[i]
|
||||
|
||||
whereParts = append(whereParts, "id = ?")
|
||||
whereArgs = append(whereArgs, ua.ID)
|
||||
expected = append(expected, &ua)
|
||||
}
|
||||
where := createdFilter + " AND (" + strings.Join(whereParts, " OR ") + ")"
|
||||
accountTests = append(accountTests, accountTest{"Find where",
|
||||
UserAccountFindRequest{
|
||||
Where: &where,
|
||||
Args: whereArgs,
|
||||
Order: []string{"created_at"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
expected,
|
||||
nil,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Log("Given the need to ensure find users returns the expected results.")
|
||||
{
|
||||
for i, tt := range accountTests {
|
||||
t.Logf("\tTest: %d\tWhen running test: %s", i, tt.name)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ctx := tests.Context()
|
||||
|
||||
res, err := FindAccounts(ctx, auth.Claims{}, test.MasterDB, tt.req)
|
||||
if err != nil && errors.Cause(err) != tt.error {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot : %+v", err)
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tWant: %+v", tt.error)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tFind failed.", tests.Failed)
|
||||
} else if diff := cmp.Diff(res, tt.expected); diff != "" {
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tGot: %d items", len(res))
|
||||
t.Logf("\t\tWant: %d items", len(tt.expected))
|
||||
t.Fatalf("\t%s\tExpected find result to match expected. Diff:\n%s", tests.Failed, diff)
|
||||
}
|
||||
t.Logf("\t%s\tFind ok.", tests.Success)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user