1
0
mirror of https://github.com/goreleaser/goreleaser.git synced 2025-01-26 04:22:05 +02:00

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Carlos Alexandro Becker
85c86d61cf
fix: chocolatey push failing (#4300)
tested this on a fake repo, and it seems to fix the problem...

seems like choco does not like when the path has `/` in it, so passing
it through `filepath.Clean` fixes it.

also improved tests a bit, and made a small docs fix.


closes https://github.com/goreleaser/goreleaser/issues/4292
2023-09-16 14:08:11 -03:00
Carlos Alexandro Becker
da1d3f4fcf
fix(chocolatey): skip publish is check by publish pipe (#4273)
the publish pipe, which runs all publishers, already skips all
publishers if skip publish is set, so this check is not needed here.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-04 16:20:58 -03:00
Carlos Alexandro Becker
72cf8404c1
feat: continue on error (#4127)
closes #3989

Basically, when some of these pipes fail, the error will be memorized,
and all errors will be thrown in the end.

Meaning: the exit code will still be 1, but it'll not have stopped in
the first error.

Thinking of maybe adding a `--fail-fast` flag to disable this behavior
as well 🤔

---------

Signed-off-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-06-20 09:33:59 -03:00
Carlos A Becker
a459911f45
fix: many linting issues
refs #3874

Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-03-19 22:17:18 -03:00
Carlos Alexandro Becker
874d698564
feat: add healthcheck cmd (#3826)
here's an idea: `goreleaser healthcheck`

It'll check if the needed dependencies (docker, git, etc) are available
in the path... this way users can preemptively run it before releasing
or to debug issues.

What do you think?

Here's how it looks like:

<img width="1007" alt="CleanShot 2023-03-02 at 23 24 26@2x"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/245435/222615682-d9cd0733-d900-43d1-9166-23b2be589b3a.png">

---------

Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-03-03 09:50:15 -03:00
Carlos Alexandro Becker
f544c5ce69
test: testctx pkg (#3807)
alternative to #3806 

the idea is that both `context.New` and `context.Context{}` are never
used in tests.

not sure yet how much I like it, so far code does look a bit more
readable though.

---------

Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-03-02 00:01:11 -03:00
Fabio Ribeiro
f2281e8ff2
feat: chocolatey support (#3509)
This PR adds support for generating the structure used to pack and push
Chocolatey Packages. And will solve the #3154

Is not ready for merge yet, but has the main structure, and ready for
comments.

Accordingly to Chocolatey, in order to build a package, it's necessary a
`.nuspec` and `chocolateyinstall.ps1` files at least, having these ones,
we could pack and distribute without adding the binary inside the final
package and that was implemented here.

To complete, will be necessary to define the package build and
distribute, however will be required to have Chocolatey installed
(Windows Only). One of alternatives that I thought was, publish the
files like Scoop and Brew in a separate repository, and there we could
use `chocolatey` through
[crazy-max/ghaction-chocolatey](https://github.com/crazy-max/ghaction-chocolatey).

Chocolatey has a lot of good examples of repositories:

https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-packages/tree/master/automatic/curl

A final compilation of the missing parts:
- [x] How to pack and push (chocolatey)
- [x] Documentation

Sorry for the long description😄 

All feedback very welcome!

Co-authored-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-11-11 23:52:32 -03:00