the warning was too trigger happy, this should fix it.
thanks @ioga for reporting it.
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
this allows to template the owner, group and mtime in file infos inside
archives.
should help towards reproducible builds!
goes well with #3618
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
this should help when reporting issues to github, especially the magical
"failed successfully" error
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
`List()` "materializes" the filters, so its used everywhere... if we
have multiple files with the same name there, its likely some filter
wasn't enough, or that the user configuration is faulty. Either way, we
should warn about it to help prevent release issues (like duplicated
assets on github).
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
GoReleaser evolved a lot since the last time I tried to implement this
>1 year ago.
Now its 100% possible, and way simpler to do it!
closes#3580
refs #2583
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
The replacements thing was always a bit weird, especially on archives.
We can solve that with templates, so, removing I'm deprecating it.
Also did the same on other places that had it the same feature.
Closes#3588
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
It makes no sense, but I saw it happens some times... the release will
be created as a draft, even though there's nothing telling it to do so.
Editing the release later might do the trick, hopefully.
closes#3541
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
this use the digests on the manifest creation.
Another PR will add it to signing too.
refs #3496
refs #3540
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
this drives it home by using the actual images/manifest digests to sign
with cosign by default.
the default signing command is changing in this PR, but since `digest`
should be always there (if not, the pipeline will fail way earlier), it
should be fine.
refs https://github.com/goreleaser/goreleaser/issues/3496
refs https://github.com/goreleaser/goreleaser/pull/3540
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
Following #3540, output artifacts' checksums to the artifact info.
This addition makes it easier to consume the checksums, especially when
running from e.g. GitHub Actions.
New tests:
1. Add a check for the checksum in the extra field.
2. Add a test for every checksum algorithm (to see that it doesn't break
for any algo's output).
3. Add a case of a binary and an extra file (to see that the logic
doesn't break when there's a mix).
p.s.
While working on that, I noticed that the convention for extra fields is
actually to use UpperCamelCase rather than lower.
I was mistaken because I looked at the subfields of the "DockerConfig"
extra field.
I think it's a good idea to fix it quickly, before the next release
rolls and it becomes a compatibility issue.
I took the liberty to fix it here as an extra commit. Please let me know
if you want it to be in a separate PR.
---
Tests:
```
go test
• refreshing checksums file=binary_bar_checksums.txt
• refreshing checksums file=binary_bar_checksums.txt
• refreshing checksums file=binary_bar_checksums.txt
PASS
ok github.com/goreleaser/goreleaser/internal/pipe/checksums 0.184s
```
Co-authored-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
Extract the digest (sha256) of docker images from the `docker push`
command for dockers published to the docker registry.
Outputting the digest is required to avoid a race condition when
referencing the image, where the image tag is being modified before the
reference is done.
See this [blog
post](https://github.com/goreleaser/goreleaser/issues/3496) for more
info.
This PR fixes https://github.com/goreleaser/goreleaser/issues/3496.
Note that the 'publish' pipe now must run before the 'metadata' pipe, so
that the information extracted during the 'publish' pipe would appear in
the metadata.
Previously, the published docker images metadata wasn't printed (because
of the order). It made sense because the content of the published image
was just a subset of the local one.
Now that it is printed to the metadata, it should have a different name
to avoid confusion.
As I mentioned, it wasn't printed before - so there shouldn't be any
backward-compatibility issues.
---
Local tests:
```
go test -v .
=== RUN TestVersion
=== RUN TestVersion/only_version
=== RUN TestVersion/version_and_date
=== RUN TestVersion/version,_date,_built_by
=== RUN TestVersion/all_empty
=== RUN TestVersion/complete
--- PASS: TestVersion (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestVersion/only_version (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestVersion/version_and_date (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestVersion/version,_date,_built_by (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestVersion/all_empty (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestVersion/complete (0.00s)
PASS
ok github.com/goreleaser/goreleaser 0.764s
```
Output example:
```
{
"name": "gallegit/hello-world:latest",
"path": "gallegit/hello-world:latest",
"goos": "linux",
"goarch": "amd64",
"internal_type": 10,
"type": "Published Docker Image",
"extra": {
"digest": "sha256:c3f7dd196a046dc061236d3c6ae1e2946269e90da30b0a959240ca799750e632"
}
}
```
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds support for generating the structure used to pack and push
Chocolatey Packages. And will solve the #3154
Is not ready for merge yet, but has the main structure, and ready for
comments.
Accordingly to Chocolatey, in order to build a package, it's necessary a
`.nuspec` and `chocolateyinstall.ps1` files at least, having these ones,
we could pack and distribute without adding the binary inside the final
package and that was implemented here.
To complete, will be necessary to define the package build and
distribute, however will be required to have Chocolatey installed
(Windows Only). One of alternatives that I thought was, publish the
files like Scoop and Brew in a separate repository, and there we could
use `chocolatey` through
[crazy-max/ghaction-chocolatey](https://github.com/crazy-max/ghaction-chocolatey).
Chocolatey has a lot of good examples of repositories:
https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-packages/tree/master/automatic/curl
A final compilation of the missing parts:
- [x] How to pack and push (chocolatey)
- [x] Documentation
Sorry for the long description😄
All feedback very welcome!
Co-authored-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Hi, thanks for contributing!
Please make sure you read our CONTRIBUTING guide.
Also, add tests and the respective documentation changes as well.
-->
<!-- If applied, this commit will... -->
This PR improves the handling of shared or static libraries by
GoReleaser. It uses the default behaviour of the Go compiler by
appending the right extension to libraries.
* `.so` and `.a` for Linux shared libraries and static libraries
respectively
* `.dylib` and `.a.` on Darwin
* `.dll` and `.lib` on Windows (pre-existent)
It does not add any configuration option to `.goreleaser.yml`, since it
leverages the existing `buildmode` flag.
Additionally, this PR takes care of adding the generated header file
into the archive.
<!-- Why is this change being made? -->
Personally I would leverage this change to release some software both as
a CLI and as a shared library. I believe others who use CGo or need
interoperability with Go from other languages could benefit from this.
<!-- # Provide links to any relevant tickets, URLs or other resources
-->
This was previously discussed in #3497.
I couldn't quite think of a proper way to add some tests to the header
archiving feature. Any recommendation?
Fix the regular expressions used in changelog group processing to valid
golang (RE2) regexps. These previously used PCRE character class `\w`
which is not supported in RE2 which is what golang regexp uses.
Also document that format matches not just title as some may thing but
the format `<abbrev-commit> <title-commit>`.
<!--
Hi, thanks for contributing!
Please make sure you read our CONTRIBUTING guide.
Also, add tests and the respective documentation changes as well.
-->
<!-- If applied, this commit will... -->
This PR implements the Archlinux packages that were added in nfpm
v2.20.0, as well as tests and documentation for them.
<!-- Why is this change being made? -->
<!-- # Provide links to any relevant tickets, URLs or other resources
-->
goreleaser/nfpm#133
goreleaser/nfpm#543
Fixes#3469
Co-authored-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
