with this patch, a config like:
```yaml
archives:
- format: tar.gz
# this name template makes the OS and Arch compatible with the results of uname.
name_template: >-
{{ .ProjectName }}_
{{- title .Os }}_
{{- if eq .Arch "amd64" }}x86_64
{{- else if eq .Arch "386" }}i386
{{- else }}{{ .Arch }}{{ end }}
{{- if .Arm }}v{{ .Arm }}{{ end }}
rlcp: true
files:
- src: "build/**/*"
dst: .
nfpms:
- package_name: foo
contents:
- src: "build/**/*"
dst: usr/share/foo
formats:
- apk
```
will eval this:
<img width="1384" alt="CleanShot 2022-12-21 at 22 21 00@2x"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/245435/209034244-7c31b5f7-cfcd-4825-bb2f-7dd463c5286a.png">
as much as I would like to make this the default, it would be a breaking
change, so we really can't do it.
If `dst` is empty, it'll have the same behavior as before (no rlcp), and
if `strip_parent` is set, it will also still have the same behavior.
Finally, if the format is binary, `rlcp` is ignored too (as it doesn't
make sense).
So, this only changes if:
- your format is not binary; and
- you have files with `src` and `dst` set
Then, goreleaser will warn you to set `rlcp: true`.
## todo
- [x] docs
- [x] more tests probably
- [x] any ideas for a better name for the new config option?
fixes#3655
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
this allows to template the owner, group and mtime in file infos inside
archives.
should help towards reproducible builds!
goes well with #3618
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
GoReleaser evolved a lot since the last time I tried to implement this
>1 year ago.
Now its 100% possible, and way simpler to do it!
closes#3580
refs #2583
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
The replacements thing was always a bit weird, especially on archives.
We can solve that with templates, so, removing I'm deprecating it.
Also did the same on other places that had it the same feature.
Closes#3588
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
This only makes it more strict for goreleaser, and in my experience so
far, is what most companies want.
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
achives -> archives
<!--
Hi, thanks for contributing!
Please make sure you read our CONTRIBUTING guide.
Also, add tests and the respective documentation changes as well.
-->
<!-- If applied, this commit will... -->
...
<!-- Why is this change being made? -->
...
<!-- # Provide links to any relevant tickets, URLs or other resources
-->
...
> You can verify yourself as the owner of the links in your profile
metadata. For that, the linked website must contain a link back to your
Mastodon profile. The link back must have a `rel="me"` attribute. The
text content of the link does not matter.
I checked that `display: none;` doesn't affect the verification process,
I was able to "verify" a link using a quick test on my own profile.
I'm not convinced this is the _best_ way, but it is _a_ way. On other
pages on the site you have a mastodon link, if those were added to the
front page they would also suffice (assuming the above criteria are
met).
this drives it home by using the actual images/manifest digests to sign
with cosign by default.
the default signing command is changing in this PR, but since `digest`
should be always there (if not, the pipeline will fail way earlier), it
should be fine.
refs https://github.com/goreleaser/goreleaser/issues/3496
refs https://github.com/goreleaser/goreleaser/pull/3540
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
this should prevent yamlschema from complaining on some fields that
accept an integer or string (goarm) and a bool or string (skip*)
Signed-off-by: Carlos A Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds support for generating the structure used to pack and push
Chocolatey Packages. And will solve the #3154
Is not ready for merge yet, but has the main structure, and ready for
comments.
Accordingly to Chocolatey, in order to build a package, it's necessary a
`.nuspec` and `chocolateyinstall.ps1` files at least, having these ones,
we could pack and distribute without adding the binary inside the final
package and that was implemented here.
To complete, will be necessary to define the package build and
distribute, however will be required to have Chocolatey installed
(Windows Only). One of alternatives that I thought was, publish the
files like Scoop and Brew in a separate repository, and there we could
use `chocolatey` through
[crazy-max/ghaction-chocolatey](https://github.com/crazy-max/ghaction-chocolatey).
Chocolatey has a lot of good examples of repositories:
https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-packages/tree/master/automatic/curl
A final compilation of the missing parts:
- [x] How to pack and push (chocolatey)
- [x] Documentation
Sorry for the long description😄
All feedback very welcome!
Co-authored-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
