When the linked worktree's branch is changed externally — by another
shell, by another tool, or by git running outside lazygit — lazygit's
worktrees model goes stale. The next post-fetch auto-forward then
doesn't realise the branch is now checked out elsewhere, and advances
its ref behind the worktree's back. The worktree's HEAD then resolves
to a commit its index/working tree haven't been updated to, and the
user sees that diff as the inverse of what was fetched — files
appearing as pending changes that they didn't make.
The test sets up a linked worktree initially on a side branch, then
externally checks out master in it before pressing fetch. Two
EXPECTED/ACTUAL pairs capture the symptoms: the branches view shows
master as `✓` rather than `↓1`, and switching to the linked worktree
shows master's would-be incoming file as a pending deletion against
HEAD.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
After a successful paste, the "X commits copied" indicator hides and
DidPaste is set, but the buffer is not cleared. If the user then
range-selects multiple commits and presses shift+C, every Add() call
rebuilds the set via SelectedHashSet(), which returns empty while
DidPaste is true; each iteration of the copy loop therefore overwrites
the previous one and only the last commit in the range survives.
When building multi-step custom command forms, some prompts are only
relevant depending on earlier answers. Without conditional logic,
users must dismiss irrelevant prompts manually.
Prompts now accept a `condition` field with a template expression
evaluated against prior form values. Skipped prompts default to
an empty string.
The template expression is a string pre- and suffixed with double curly
braces - {{}}.
Form keys can be reused, a guard ensures that skipped prompts do not
reset already set form keys with an empty string. This allows the
conditional flow to remind a user to set a key that was left empty
because additional conditions want that key to be set. This removes the
need to have additional if checks in the command that uses the form
keys.
When discarding a directory, we only want to discard those files that are
visible in the current filter view. The tests show that this already works
correctly for discarding all changes, but it doesn't for discarding only
unstaged changes: in this case, untracked files are handled correctly, but
changes to tracked files are discarded without respecting the filter.
This is a pretty special case (see comment in the test for details). It is
working correctly, but I almost broke it during development, so it's good to
cover it with a test.
Given a block of consecutive changed lines, trying to stage only some of them
doesn't work correctly in all cases:
- if the staged lines are the last lines in the block of changes, it already
works
- when staging some changes in the middle of the block, it doesn't work as
desired, but we also don't try to fix this case in this branch, because it's
harder to do, and not as common as the other two
- staging the first lines of the block doesn't work as desired, and we will fix
that in this branch.
When .git/info directory does not exist (can happen with bare clones
or manual deletion), the Exclude function failed with 'no such file
or directory'. Added os.MkdirAll to create the directory before
opening the exclude file.
Added integration test exclude_without_info_dir that removes .git/info
before attempting to exclude a file.
Change working tree files and commit files panels to use filtering
(reducing the list) instead of search (highlighting matches). This
matches the behavior of other filterable views.
The text filter matches against the full file path, not just the
filename, which is more useful for navigating large directory trees.
When toggling a directory for a custom patch while a text filter is
active, only the visible filtered files in the directory are affected,
consistent with how staging a directory in the files panel works.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Without this check, the selection was being reset to 0 whenever
ReApplyFilter was called for the current filter context, even when
the user wasn't actively typing in the search prompt (e.g. when the
model updates in the background). This was causing unexpected cursor
jumps.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
I always press 'd' in the patch building view, expecting that I can do
exactly what I can do in the staging view, to find out I need to go
space -> ctrl+p -> d and I think it's time to honour the muscle memory
and support this convenience keybinding.
I've optimised for muscle memory backwards compatibility here:
- Outside interactive rebase: press 'f' then instead of a confirmation
panel, a menu appears where you can choose to keep the selected commit's
message
- Inside interactive rebase: press 'f' then press 'c' to see the menu
for keeping the message, where if you press 'c' again it will retain the
current message. so 'fcc' is the chord to press.
We're also now showing the -C flag (which is what enables the behaviour)
against the todo.
I've picked the 'c' keybinding because 'C' was taken and it corresponds
to the flag. Previously that showed a warning about a change in
keybinding for cherry picking but it's been ages since we've made that
change so I'm happy to retire it.
The test shows two problems: a <down> keybinding is not removed from a menu item
(the 'y' binding is removed though, which is correct), and keybindings such as
'j' and 'H' don't work. We will fix both of these separately in the following
commits.
Introduce the 'SelectedSubmodule' struct and allow using it as a
placeholder value.
Add a corresponding test.
Update the documentation to include it among the listed placeholder
values.
This will put whatever git's default merge variant is as the first menu item,
and add a second item which is the opposite (no-ff if the default is ff, and
vice versa).
If users prefer to always have the same option first no matter whether it's
applicable, they can make ff always appear first by setting git's "merge.ff"
config to "true" or "only", or by setting lazygit's "git.merging.args" config to
"--ff" or "--ff-only"; if they want no-ff to appear first, they can do that by
setting git's "merge.ff" config to "false", or by setting lazygit's
"git.merging.args" config to "--no-ff". Which of these they choose depends on
whether they want the config to also apply to other git clients including the
cli, or only to lazygit.
I can't do my usual "add the tests first, with EXPECTED/ACTUAL sections that
document the bug" method here, because the tests would hang without the bug
being fixed.
We need two different tests here: one where a cherry-picked commit simply
becomes empty "by itself", because the change is already present on the
destination branch (this was only a problem with git versions older than 2.45),
and the other where the cherry-pick stops with conflicts, and the user resolves
them such that no changes are left, and then continues the cherry-pick. This
would still fail even with git 2.45 or later. The fix is the same for both cases
though.
The tests show that the selection behavior after skipping an empty cherry-picked
commit is not ideal, but since that's only a minor cosmetic problem we don't
bother fixing it here.
Replace merge-tool with merge options menu that allows resolving all
conflicts for selected files as ours, theirs, or union, while still
providing access to the merge tool.
The test shows that we are currently auto-forwarding branches even if they are
checked out by another worktree; this is quite bad, because when you switch to
that other worktree you'll see that the files that are touched by the fetched
commits are all modified (which we don't test here).
There's no reason not to allow these.
Technically we could enable a few more, but I chose not to because some might be
surprising or confusing in filtering mode. For example, creating a fixup commit
would work (shift-F), but the newly created commit might not show up if it
doesn't match the filter. Similarly, pressing `f` to fixup a commit into its
parent would work, but that parent commit might not be visible, so users might
expect to be fixing up into the next visible commit.
The test shows that selecting a commit before the rename shows an empty diff,
and selecting the rename itself shows an added file rather than a rename.
The test shows that it doesn't work, the list is empty both when filtering by
file and by folder.
I could have added test cases for these to the unit tests in
stash_loader_test.go instead, but I don't find tests that need to mock git's
output very valuable, so I opted for an integration test even though it takes
much longer to run.
The tests show that this currently fails with the confusing error message "does
not match index", regardless of whether the patch conflicts with the
modifications or not. We'll improve this in the next commit.
I don't bother adding tests for reverting a patch, as the code is basically the
same as for apply.
This is functionality that works already, we only add the test for more complete
test coverage. However, there's a detail problem, and the test demonstrates
this: we keep the stash even if there was no conflict. We'll fix this next.
The icon will appear when there's a tag with the same name as the current branch
(that's what we're testing here), or even when there's a remote with the same
name. I'm not adding a test for this latter case, but this was actually how I
discovered the issue.
Pretty basic fix, didn't seem to have any complications.
I only added the refs/ prefix to the FullRefName() method
to align with other similar methods, and to make this change
not impact any user facing modals.
Fixes: https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/issues/4634
Also adds a test demonstrating that the stash show behavior is now fixed
This now allows for leaving the status panel and returning back to the
same log command. Previously any return to the status panel would result
in the next command in the list being shown. Now, you need to press `a`,
with a log command being rendered, to rotate to the next
allBranchesLogCmd.
I almost broke this during the development of this branch, so add a test to
guard against that. The point here is that the stack remains intact, i.e. the
newly created commit is the last commit of the lower branch, and thus shows the
"*".
Stefan Haller
Martin T.
blakemckeany
cobyfrombrooklyn-bot
Jesse Duffield
Karl Wikström
Karol Zwolak
rlkandela
Krystof Gartner
kyu08
Chris McDonnell