* implementation draft
* add cfg options skip-au-when-missing && client-id-verification-claim; enhance the provider data verification logic for sake of the added options
* refactor configs, added logging and add additional claim verification
* simplify logic by just having one configuration similar to oidc-email-claim
* added internal oidc token verifier, so that aud check behavior can be managed with oauth2-proxy and is compatible with extra-jwt-issuers
* refactored verification to reduce complexity
* refactored verification to reduce complexity
* added docs
* adjust tests to support new OIDCAudienceClaim and OIDCExtraAudiences options
* extend unit tests and ensure that audience is set with the value of aud claim configuration
* revert filemodes and update docs
* update docs
* remove unneccesary logging, refactor audience existence check and added additional unit tests
* fix linting issues after rebase on origin/main
* cleanup: use new imports for migrated libraries after rebase on origin/main
* adapt mock in keycloak_oidc_test.go
* allow specifying multiple audience claims, fixed bug where jwt issuers client id was not the being considered and fixed bug where aud claims with multiple audiences has broken the whole validation
* fixed formatting issue
* do not pass the whole options struct to minimize complexity and dependency to the configuration structure
* added changelog entry
* update docs
Co-authored-by: Sofia Weiler <sofia.weiler@aoe.com>
Co-authored-by: Christian Zenker <christian.zenker@aoe.com>
* Add ValidateSession function to LoginGovProvder to include Auth Header
* Update CHANGELOG for PR 1509
* Update logingov_test to include ValidationURL
* Remove the information about `Microsoft Azure AD`
* Put `proxy_buffer_size` in a code tag
* Update `CHANGELOG.md`
Co-authored-by: Joel Speed <Joel.speed@hotmail.co.uk>
I was recently looking into the order in which oauth2-proxy evaluates it configuration options from the various sources.
I think this will also be helpful for other users.
Since oauth2-proxy is using viper, the order of configuration sources is as follows [1]:
> Viper uses the following precedence order. Each item takes precedence over the item below it:
>
> explicit call to Set
> flag
> env
> config
> key/value store
> default
[1] https://github.com/spf13/viper/blob/master/README.md#why-viper
Co-authored-by: Joel Speed <Joel.speed@hotmail.co.uk>