You've already forked opentelemetry-go
mirror of
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go.git
synced 2025-07-15 01:04:25 +02:00
Replace Ordered
with an iterator in export.Labels
. (#567)
* Do not expose a slice of labels in export.Record This is really an inconvenient implementation detail leak - we may want to store labels in a different way. Replace it with an iterator - it does not force us to use slice of key values as a storage in the long run. * Add Len to LabelIterator It may come in handy in several situations, where we don't have access to export.Labels object, but only to the label iterator. * Use reflect value label iterator for the fixed labels * add reset operation to iterator Makes my life easier when writing a benchmark. Might also be an alternative to cloning the iterator. * Add benchmarks for iterators * Add import comment * Add clone operation to label iterator * Move iterator tests to a separate package * Add tests for cloning iterators * Pass label iterator to export labels * Use non-addressable array reflect values By not using the value created by `reflect.New()`, but rather by `reflect.ValueOf()`, we get a non-addressable array in the value, which does not infer an allocation cost when getting an element from the array. * Drop zero iterator This can be substituted by a reflect value iterator that goes over a value with a zero-sized array. * Add a simple iterator that implements label iterator In the long run this will completely replace the LabelIterator interface. * Replace reflect value iterator with simple iterator * Pass label storage to new export labels, not label iterator * Drop label iterator interface, rename storage iterator to label iterator * Drop clone operation from iterator It's a leftover from interface times and now it's pointless - the iterator is a simple struct, so cloning it is a simple copy. * Drop Reset from label iterator The sole existence of Reset was actually for benchmarking convenience. Now we can just copy the iterator cheaply, so a need for Reset is no more. * Drop noop iterator tests * Move back iterator tests to export package * Eagerly get the reflect value of ordered labels So we won't get into problems when several goroutines want to iterate the same labels at the same time. Not sure if this would be a big deal, since every goroutine would compute the same reflect.Value, but concurrent write to the same memory is bad anyway. And it doesn't cost us any extra allocations anyway. * Replace NewSliceLabelIterator() with a method of LabelSlice * Add some documentation * Documentation fixes
This commit is contained in:
@ -82,14 +82,18 @@ type (
|
||||
// repeatedly.
|
||||
labels struct {
|
||||
meter *SDK
|
||||
|
||||
// slice is a slice of `ordered`.
|
||||
slice sortedLabels
|
||||
|
||||
// ordered is the output of sorting and deduplicating
|
||||
// the labels, copied into an array of the correct
|
||||
// size for use as a map key.
|
||||
ordered orderedLabels
|
||||
|
||||
// sortSlice has a single purpose - as a temporary
|
||||
// place for sorting during labels creation to avoid
|
||||
// allocation
|
||||
sortSlice sortedLabels
|
||||
// cachedValue contains a `reflect.Value` of the `ordered`
|
||||
// member
|
||||
cachedValue reflect.Value
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// mapkey uniquely describes a metric instrument in terms of
|
||||
@ -150,11 +154,12 @@ type (
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
var (
|
||||
_ api.MeterImpl = &SDK{}
|
||||
_ api.LabelSet = &labels{}
|
||||
_ api.AsyncImpl = &asyncInstrument{}
|
||||
_ api.SyncImpl = &syncInstrument{}
|
||||
_ api.BoundSyncImpl = &record{}
|
||||
_ api.MeterImpl = &SDK{}
|
||||
_ api.LabelSet = &labels{}
|
||||
_ api.AsyncImpl = &asyncInstrument{}
|
||||
_ api.SyncImpl = &syncInstrument{}
|
||||
_ api.BoundSyncImpl = &record{}
|
||||
_ export.LabelStorage = &labels{}
|
||||
|
||||
kvType = reflect.TypeOf(core.KeyValue{})
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -295,11 +300,15 @@ func (s *syncInstrument) RecordOne(ctx context.Context, number core.Number, ls a
|
||||
// own periodic collection.
|
||||
func New(batcher export.Batcher, labelEncoder export.LabelEncoder) *SDK {
|
||||
m := &SDK{
|
||||
empty: labels{
|
||||
ordered: [0]core.KeyValue{},
|
||||
},
|
||||
batcher: batcher,
|
||||
labelEncoder: labelEncoder,
|
||||
errorHandler: DefaultErrorHandler,
|
||||
}
|
||||
m.empty.meter = m
|
||||
m.empty.cachedValue = reflect.ValueOf(m.empty.ordered)
|
||||
return m
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -307,8 +316,10 @@ func DefaultErrorHandler(err error) {
|
||||
fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, "Metrics SDK error:", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Labels returns a LabelSet corresponding to the arguments. Passed
|
||||
// labels are de-duplicated, with last-value-wins semantics.
|
||||
// Labels returns a LabelSet corresponding to the arguments. Passed labels
|
||||
// are sorted and de-duplicated, with last-value-wins semantics. Note that
|
||||
// sorting and deduplicating happens in-place to avoid allocation, so the
|
||||
// passed slice will be modified.
|
||||
func (m *SDK) Labels(kvs ...core.KeyValue) api.LabelSet {
|
||||
// Check for empty set.
|
||||
if len(kvs) == 0 {
|
||||
@ -316,33 +327,15 @@ func (m *SDK) Labels(kvs ...core.KeyValue) api.LabelSet {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ls := &labels{ // allocation
|
||||
meter: m,
|
||||
slice: kvs,
|
||||
meter: m,
|
||||
sortSlice: kvs,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Sort and de-duplicate. Note: this use of `ls.slice` avoids
|
||||
// an allocation by using the address-able field rather than
|
||||
// `kvs`. Labels retains a copy of this slice, i.e., the
|
||||
// initial allocation at the varargs call site.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Note that `ls.slice` continues to refer to this memory,
|
||||
// even though a new array is allocated for `ls.ordered`. It
|
||||
// is possible for the `slice` to refer to the same memory,
|
||||
// although in the reflection code path of `computeOrdered` it
|
||||
// costs an allocation to yield a slice through
|
||||
// `(reflect.Value).Interface()`.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// TODO: There is a possibility that the caller passes values
|
||||
// without an allocation (e.g., `meter.Labels(kvs...)`), and
|
||||
// that the user could later modify the slice, leading to
|
||||
// incorrect results. This is indeed a risk, one that should
|
||||
// be quickly addressed via the following TODO.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// TODO: It would be better overall if the export.Labels interface
|
||||
// did not expose a slice via `Ordered()`, if instead it exposed
|
||||
// getter methods like `Len()` and `Order(i int)`. Then we would
|
||||
// just implement the interface using the `orderedLabels` array.
|
||||
sort.Stable(&ls.slice)
|
||||
// Sort and de-duplicate. Note: this use of `ls.sortSlice`
|
||||
// avoids an allocation by using the address-able field rather
|
||||
// than `kvs`.
|
||||
sort.Stable(&ls.sortSlice)
|
||||
ls.sortSlice = nil
|
||||
|
||||
oi := 1
|
||||
for i := 1; i < len(kvs); i++ {
|
||||
@ -355,64 +348,81 @@ func (m *SDK) Labels(kvs ...core.KeyValue) api.LabelSet {
|
||||
oi++
|
||||
}
|
||||
kvs = kvs[0:oi]
|
||||
ls.slice = kvs
|
||||
ls.computeOrdered(kvs)
|
||||
return ls
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (ls *labels) NumLabels() int {
|
||||
return ls.cachedValue.Len()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (ls *labels) GetLabel(idx int) core.KeyValue {
|
||||
return ls.cachedValue.Index(idx).Interface().(core.KeyValue)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (ls *labels) computeOrdered(kvs []core.KeyValue) {
|
||||
ls.ordered = computeOrderedFixed(kvs)
|
||||
if ls.ordered == nil {
|
||||
ls.ordered = computeOrderedReflect(kvs)
|
||||
}
|
||||
ls.cachedValue = reflect.ValueOf(ls.ordered)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func computeOrderedFixed(kvs []core.KeyValue) orderedLabels {
|
||||
switch len(kvs) {
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
ptr := new([1]core.KeyValue)
|
||||
copy((*ptr)[:], kvs)
|
||||
ls.ordered = *ptr
|
||||
return *ptr
|
||||
case 2:
|
||||
ptr := new([2]core.KeyValue)
|
||||
copy((*ptr)[:], kvs)
|
||||
ls.ordered = *ptr
|
||||
return *ptr
|
||||
case 3:
|
||||
ptr := new([3]core.KeyValue)
|
||||
copy((*ptr)[:], kvs)
|
||||
ls.ordered = *ptr
|
||||
return *ptr
|
||||
case 4:
|
||||
ptr := new([4]core.KeyValue)
|
||||
copy((*ptr)[:], kvs)
|
||||
ls.ordered = *ptr
|
||||
return *ptr
|
||||
case 5:
|
||||
ptr := new([5]core.KeyValue)
|
||||
copy((*ptr)[:], kvs)
|
||||
ls.ordered = *ptr
|
||||
return *ptr
|
||||
case 6:
|
||||
ptr := new([6]core.KeyValue)
|
||||
copy((*ptr)[:], kvs)
|
||||
ls.ordered = *ptr
|
||||
return *ptr
|
||||
case 7:
|
||||
ptr := new([7]core.KeyValue)
|
||||
copy((*ptr)[:], kvs)
|
||||
ls.ordered = *ptr
|
||||
return *ptr
|
||||
case 8:
|
||||
ptr := new([8]core.KeyValue)
|
||||
copy((*ptr)[:], kvs)
|
||||
ls.ordered = *ptr
|
||||
return *ptr
|
||||
case 9:
|
||||
ptr := new([9]core.KeyValue)
|
||||
copy((*ptr)[:], kvs)
|
||||
ls.ordered = *ptr
|
||||
return *ptr
|
||||
case 10:
|
||||
ptr := new([10]core.KeyValue)
|
||||
copy((*ptr)[:], kvs)
|
||||
ls.ordered = *ptr
|
||||
return *ptr
|
||||
default:
|
||||
at := reflect.New(reflect.ArrayOf(len(kvs), kvType)).Elem()
|
||||
|
||||
for i := 0; i < len(kvs); i++ {
|
||||
*(at.Index(i).Addr().Interface().(*core.KeyValue)) = kvs[i]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ls.ordered = at.Interface()
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func computeOrderedReflect(kvs []core.KeyValue) interface{} {
|
||||
at := reflect.New(reflect.ArrayOf(len(kvs), kvType)).Elem()
|
||||
for i, kv := range kvs {
|
||||
*(at.Index(i).Addr().Interface().(*core.KeyValue)) = kv
|
||||
}
|
||||
return at.Interface()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// labsFor sanitizes the input LabelSet. The input will be rejected
|
||||
// if it was created by another Meter instance, for example.
|
||||
func (m *SDK) labsFor(ls api.LabelSet) *labels {
|
||||
@ -539,7 +549,8 @@ func (m *SDK) checkpoint(ctx context.Context, descriptor *metric.Descriptor, rec
|
||||
// instead of once per bound instrument lifetime. This can be
|
||||
// addressed similarly to OTEP 78, see
|
||||
// https://github.com/jmacd/opentelemetry-go/blob/8bed2e14df7f9f4688fbab141924bb786dc9a3a1/api/context/internal/set.go#L89
|
||||
exportLabels := export.NewLabels(labels.slice, m.labelEncoder.Encode(labels.slice), m.labelEncoder)
|
||||
iter := export.NewLabelIterator(labels)
|
||||
exportLabels := export.NewLabels(labels, m.labelEncoder.Encode(iter), m.labelEncoder)
|
||||
exportRecord := export.NewRecord(descriptor, exportLabels, recorder)
|
||||
err := m.batcher.Process(ctx, exportRecord)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user