* Consolidate stdout exporter
* Move config to own file and match project standard
* Abstract Exporter into unified struct
* Rename trace part of the exporter
* Update import paths and configuration
* Update tests
* Update InstallNewPipeline to not return traceProvider
It is a registered global, access it that way.
* Update example_test
* Update docs
* Update example to be for whole package
* Update metric output
Closer match the span output.
* Clean up span output
Print as a batch and cleanup marshaling.
* Correct spelling error in doc
* Add Exporters README
* Update Changelog
* Propagate changes to rest of project
* Lint fixes
* Fix example test in metric SDK
* Add disable config options for trace and metric
Co-authored-by: Liz Fong-Jones <lizf@honeycomb.io>
* Update License header for all source files
- Add Apache 2.0 header to source files that did not have one.
- Update all existing headers dated to 2019 to be 2020
- Remove comma from License header to comply with the Apache 2.0
guidelines.
* Update Copyright notice
Use the standard Copyright notices outlined by the
[CNCF](https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/copyright-notices.md#copyright-notices)
The `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporter/trace/jaeger` package was
mistakenly released with a `v1.0.0` tag instead of `v0.1.0`. This
resulted in all subsequent releases not becoming the default latest,
meaning that `go get`s pulled in the incompatible `v0.1.0` release of
that package when pulling in more recent packages from other otel
packages. Renaming the `exporter` directory to `exporters` fixes this
issue by consequentially renaming the package.
Additionally, this action also renames *all* exporters. This is
understood to be a disruptive action to existing users as they will need
to update any dependencies they currently have on our exporters.
However, it was decided to take this action regardless. The need to
resolve the existing issue explained above is highly important, and
given the Alpha state of this project these kinds of breaking changes
should be expected (though not without reason).
Resolves#331
Co-authored-by: Rahul Patel <rghetia@yahoo.com>
