From 41ad768fd6d8e8ae4d5444db98735d4d33e7c0ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: LukeMathWalker <20745048+LukeMathWalker@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 13:34:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Be more coincise

---
 src/idiomatic/leveraging-the-type-system/newtype-pattern.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/idiomatic/leveraging-the-type-system/newtype-pattern.md b/src/idiomatic/leveraging-the-type-system/newtype-pattern.md
index 18104d73..330e465b 100644
--- a/src/idiomatic/leveraging-the-type-system/newtype-pattern.md
+++ b/src/idiomatic/leveraging-the-type-system/newtype-pattern.md
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ fn double(n: u64) -> u64 {
 double(UserId(1)); // 🛠️❌
 ```
 
-The Rust compiler won't implicitly convert to (or from) the underlying type.\
-It won't let you use methods or operators defined on the underlying type either:
+The Rust compiler won't let you use methods or operators defined on the
+underlying type either:
 
 ```rust,compile_fail
 # pub struct UserId(u64);