Minor fix-ups to the async section. (#566)

These address some comments in #496.

src/async/control-flow/select.md

@@ -69,7 +69,9 @@ async fn main() {
 * Try adding a deadline to the race, demonstrating selecting different sorts of
   futures.
 
-* Note that `select!` consumes the futures it is given, and is easiest to use
+* Note that `select!` moves the values it is given. It is easiest to use
-  when every execution of `select!` creates new futures.
+  when every execution of `select!` creates new futures. An alternative is to
+  pass `&mut future` instead of the future itself, but this can lead to
+  issues, further discussed in the pinning slide.
 
 </details>

src/async/pitfalls/async-traits.md

@@ -48,13 +48,14 @@ async fn main() {
 
 <details>  
 
-* The difficulty with `async trait` is in that the resulting `Future` does not
-  have a size known at compile time, because the size of the `Future` depends
-  on the implementation. 
-
 * `async_trait` is easy to use, but note that it's using heap allocations to
-  achieve this, and solve the unknow size problem above. This heap allocation
+  achieve this. This heap allocation has performance overhead.
-  has performance overhead.
+
+* The challenges in language support for `async trait` are deep Rust and
+  probably not worth describing in-depth. Niko Matsakis did a good job of
+  explaining them in [this
+  post](https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2019/10/26/async-fn-in-traits-are-hard/)
+  if you are interested in digging deeper.
 
 * Try creating a new sleeper struct that will sleep for a random amount of time
   and adding it to the Vec.

src/async/pitfalls/pin.md

@@ -103,8 +103,10 @@ async fn main() {
       iteration (a fused future would help with this). Update to reset
       `timeout_fut` every time it expires.
 
-* Box allocates on the heap. In some cases, `tokio::pin!` is also an option, but
+* Box allocates on the heap. In some cases, `std::pin::pin!` (only recently
+  stabilized, with older code often using `tokio::pin!`) is also an option, but
   that is difficult to use for a future that is reassigned.
+
 * Another alternative is to not use `pin` at all but spawn another task that will send to a `oneshot` channel every 100ms.
 
 </details>

src/async/tasks.md

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 # Tasks
 
-Runtimes have the concept of a "Task", similar to a thread but much
+Runtimes have the concept of a "task", similar to a thread but much
 less resource-intensive.
 
-A Task has a single top-level Future which the executor polls to make progress.
+A task has a single top-level future which the executor polls to make progress.
 That future may have one or more nested futures that its `poll` method polls,
 corresponding loosely to a call stack. Concurrency within a task is possible by
 polling multiple child futures, such as racing a timer and an I/O operation.

src/exercises/day-4/async.md

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-# Exercises
-
-TBD