# `HashMap` Standard hash map with protection against HashDoS attacks: ```rust,editable use std::collections::HashMap; fn main() { let mut page_counts = HashMap::new(); page_counts.insert("Adventures of Huckleberry Finn".to_string(), 207); page_counts.insert("Grimms' Fairy Tales".to_string(), 751); page_counts.insert("Pride and Prejudice".to_string(), 303); if !page_counts.contains_key("Les Misérables") { println!("We know about {} books, but not Les Misérables.", page_counts.len()); } for book in ["Pride and Prejudice", "Alice's Adventure in Wonderland"] { match page_counts.get(book) { Some(count) => println!("{book}: {count} pages"), None => println!("{book} is unknown.") } } // Use the .entry() method to insert a value if nothing is found. for book in ["Pride and Prejudice", "Alice's Adventure in Wonderland"] { let page_count: &mut i32 = page_counts.entry(book.to_string()).or_insert(0); *page_count += 1; } println!("{page_counts:#?}"); } ```
* `HashMap` is not defined in the prelude and needs to be brought into scope. * Try the following lines of code. The first line will see if a book is in the hashmap and if not return an alternative value. The second line will insert the alternative value in the hashmap if the book is not found. ```rust,ignore let pc1 = page_counts .get("Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone ") .unwrap_or(&336); let pc2 = page_counts .entry("The Hunger Games".to_string()) .or_insert(374); ``` * Unlike `vec!`, there is unfortunately no standard `hashmap!` macro.