1
0
mirror of https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep.git synced 2024-12-12 19:18:24 +02:00
ripgrep/Cargo.lock

555 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

# This file is automatically @generated by Cargo.
# It is not intended for manual editing.
version = 3
[[package]]
name = "aho-corasick"
2023-10-10 00:23:36 +02:00
version = "1.1.2"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-10-10 00:23:36 +02:00
checksum = "b2969dcb958b36655471fc61f7e416fa76033bdd4bfed0678d8fee1e2d07a1f0"
dependencies = [
"memchr",
]
[[package]]
name = "anyhow"
version = "1.0.75"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "a4668cab20f66d8d020e1fbc0ebe47217433c1b6c8f2040faf858554e394ace6"
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "autocfg"
version = "1.1.0"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "d468802bab17cbc0cc575e9b053f41e72aa36bfa6b7f55e3529ffa43161b97fa"
2019-04-06 04:28:43 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "bstr"
2023-11-26 20:28:30 +02:00
version = "1.8.0"
2019-04-06 04:28:43 +02:00
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-11-26 20:28:30 +02:00
checksum = "542f33a8835a0884b006a0c3df3dadd99c0c3f296ed26c2fdc8028e01ad6230c"
2019-04-06 04:28:43 +02:00
dependencies = [
"memchr",
"regex-automata",
2023-01-05 15:19:33 +02:00
"serde",
2019-04-06 04:28:43 +02:00
]
[[package]]
name = "cc"
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
version = "1.0.83"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
checksum = "f1174fb0b6ec23863f8b971027804a42614e347eafb0a95bf0b12cdae21fc4d0"
dependencies = [
"jobserver",
2023-08-15 17:09:46 +02:00
"libc",
]
[[package]]
name = "cfg-if"
version = "1.0.0"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "baf1de4339761588bc0619e3cbc0120ee582ebb74b53b4efbf79117bd2da40fd"
[[package]]
name = "crossbeam-channel"
version = "0.5.8"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "a33c2bf77f2df06183c3aa30d1e96c0695a313d4f9c453cc3762a6db39f99200"
dependencies = [
"cfg-if",
"crossbeam-utils",
]
[[package]]
name = "crossbeam-deque"
version = "0.8.3"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "ce6fd6f855243022dcecf8702fef0c297d4338e226845fe067f6341ad9fa0cef"
dependencies = [
"cfg-if",
"crossbeam-epoch",
"crossbeam-utils",
]
[[package]]
name = "crossbeam-epoch"
version = "0.9.15"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "ae211234986c545741a7dc064309f67ee1e5ad243d0e48335adc0484d960bcc7"
dependencies = [
"autocfg",
"cfg-if",
"crossbeam-utils",
"memoffset",
"scopeguard",
]
[[package]]
name = "crossbeam-utils"
version = "0.8.16"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "5a22b2d63d4d1dc0b7f1b6b2747dd0088008a9be28b6ddf0b1e7d335e3037294"
dependencies = [
"cfg-if",
]
Add support for additional text encodings. This includes, but is not limited to, UTF-16, latin-1, GBK, EUC-JP and Shift_JIS. (Courtesy of the `encoding_rs` crate.) Specifically, this feature enables ripgrep to search files that are encoded in an encoding other than UTF-8. The list of available encodings is tied directly to what the `encoding_rs` crate supports, which is in turn tied to the Encoding Standard. The full list of available encodings can be found here: https://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-encoding-get This pull request also introduces the notion that text encodings can be automatically detected on a best effort basis. Currently, the only support for this is checking for a UTF-16 bom. In all other cases, a text encoding of `auto` (the default) implies a UTF-8 or ASCII compatible source encoding. When a text encoding is otherwise specified, it is unconditionally used for all files searched. Since ripgrep's regex engine is fundamentally built on top of UTF-8, this feature works by transcoding the files to be searched from their source encoding to UTF-8. This transcoding only happens when: 1. `auto` is specified and a non-UTF-8 encoding is detected. 2. A specific encoding is given by end users (including UTF-8). When transcoding occurs, errors are handled by automatically inserting the Unicode replacement character. In this case, ripgrep's output is guaranteed to be valid UTF-8 (excluding non-UTF-8 file paths, if they are printed). In all other cases, the source text is searched directly, which implies an assumption that it is at least ASCII compatible, but where UTF-8 is most useful. In this scenario, encoding errors are not detected. In this case, ripgrep's output will match the input exactly, byte-for-byte. This design may not be optimal in all cases, but it has some advantages: 1. In the happy path ("UTF-8 everywhere") remains happy. I have not been able to witness any performance regressions. 2. In the non-UTF-8 path, implementation complexity is kept relatively low. The cost here is transcoding itself. A potentially superior implementation might build decoding of any encoding into the regex engine itself. In particular, the fundamental problem with transcoding everything first is that literal optimizations are nearly negated. Future work should entail improving the user experience. For example, we might want to auto-detect more text encodings. A more elaborate UX experience might permit end users to specify multiple text encodings, although this seems hard to pull off in an ergonomic way. Fixes #1
2017-03-09 03:22:48 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "encoding_rs"
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
version = "0.8.33"
Add support for additional text encodings. This includes, but is not limited to, UTF-16, latin-1, GBK, EUC-JP and Shift_JIS. (Courtesy of the `encoding_rs` crate.) Specifically, this feature enables ripgrep to search files that are encoded in an encoding other than UTF-8. The list of available encodings is tied directly to what the `encoding_rs` crate supports, which is in turn tied to the Encoding Standard. The full list of available encodings can be found here: https://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-encoding-get This pull request also introduces the notion that text encodings can be automatically detected on a best effort basis. Currently, the only support for this is checking for a UTF-16 bom. In all other cases, a text encoding of `auto` (the default) implies a UTF-8 or ASCII compatible source encoding. When a text encoding is otherwise specified, it is unconditionally used for all files searched. Since ripgrep's regex engine is fundamentally built on top of UTF-8, this feature works by transcoding the files to be searched from their source encoding to UTF-8. This transcoding only happens when: 1. `auto` is specified and a non-UTF-8 encoding is detected. 2. A specific encoding is given by end users (including UTF-8). When transcoding occurs, errors are handled by automatically inserting the Unicode replacement character. In this case, ripgrep's output is guaranteed to be valid UTF-8 (excluding non-UTF-8 file paths, if they are printed). In all other cases, the source text is searched directly, which implies an assumption that it is at least ASCII compatible, but where UTF-8 is most useful. In this scenario, encoding errors are not detected. In this case, ripgrep's output will match the input exactly, byte-for-byte. This design may not be optimal in all cases, but it has some advantages: 1. In the happy path ("UTF-8 everywhere") remains happy. I have not been able to witness any performance regressions. 2. In the non-UTF-8 path, implementation complexity is kept relatively low. The cost here is transcoding itself. A potentially superior implementation might build decoding of any encoding into the regex engine itself. In particular, the fundamental problem with transcoding everything first is that literal optimizations are nearly negated. Future work should entail improving the user experience. For example, we might want to auto-detect more text encodings. A more elaborate UX experience might permit end users to specify multiple text encodings, although this seems hard to pull off in an ergonomic way. Fixes #1
2017-03-09 03:22:48 +02:00
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
checksum = "7268b386296a025e474d5140678f75d6de9493ae55a5d709eeb9dd08149945e1"
Add support for additional text encodings. This includes, but is not limited to, UTF-16, latin-1, GBK, EUC-JP and Shift_JIS. (Courtesy of the `encoding_rs` crate.) Specifically, this feature enables ripgrep to search files that are encoded in an encoding other than UTF-8. The list of available encodings is tied directly to what the `encoding_rs` crate supports, which is in turn tied to the Encoding Standard. The full list of available encodings can be found here: https://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-encoding-get This pull request also introduces the notion that text encodings can be automatically detected on a best effort basis. Currently, the only support for this is checking for a UTF-16 bom. In all other cases, a text encoding of `auto` (the default) implies a UTF-8 or ASCII compatible source encoding. When a text encoding is otherwise specified, it is unconditionally used for all files searched. Since ripgrep's regex engine is fundamentally built on top of UTF-8, this feature works by transcoding the files to be searched from their source encoding to UTF-8. This transcoding only happens when: 1. `auto` is specified and a non-UTF-8 encoding is detected. 2. A specific encoding is given by end users (including UTF-8). When transcoding occurs, errors are handled by automatically inserting the Unicode replacement character. In this case, ripgrep's output is guaranteed to be valid UTF-8 (excluding non-UTF-8 file paths, if they are printed). In all other cases, the source text is searched directly, which implies an assumption that it is at least ASCII compatible, but where UTF-8 is most useful. In this scenario, encoding errors are not detected. In this case, ripgrep's output will match the input exactly, byte-for-byte. This design may not be optimal in all cases, but it has some advantages: 1. In the happy path ("UTF-8 everywhere") remains happy. I have not been able to witness any performance regressions. 2. In the non-UTF-8 path, implementation complexity is kept relatively low. The cost here is transcoding itself. A potentially superior implementation might build decoding of any encoding into the regex engine itself. In particular, the fundamental problem with transcoding everything first is that literal optimizations are nearly negated. Future work should entail improving the user experience. For example, we might want to auto-detect more text encodings. A more elaborate UX experience might permit end users to specify multiple text encodings, although this seems hard to pull off in an ergonomic way. Fixes #1
2017-03-09 03:22:48 +02:00
dependencies = [
"cfg-if",
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
"packed_simd",
Add support for additional text encodings. This includes, but is not limited to, UTF-16, latin-1, GBK, EUC-JP and Shift_JIS. (Courtesy of the `encoding_rs` crate.) Specifically, this feature enables ripgrep to search files that are encoded in an encoding other than UTF-8. The list of available encodings is tied directly to what the `encoding_rs` crate supports, which is in turn tied to the Encoding Standard. The full list of available encodings can be found here: https://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-encoding-get This pull request also introduces the notion that text encodings can be automatically detected on a best effort basis. Currently, the only support for this is checking for a UTF-16 bom. In all other cases, a text encoding of `auto` (the default) implies a UTF-8 or ASCII compatible source encoding. When a text encoding is otherwise specified, it is unconditionally used for all files searched. Since ripgrep's regex engine is fundamentally built on top of UTF-8, this feature works by transcoding the files to be searched from their source encoding to UTF-8. This transcoding only happens when: 1. `auto` is specified and a non-UTF-8 encoding is detected. 2. A specific encoding is given by end users (including UTF-8). When transcoding occurs, errors are handled by automatically inserting the Unicode replacement character. In this case, ripgrep's output is guaranteed to be valid UTF-8 (excluding non-UTF-8 file paths, if they are printed). In all other cases, the source text is searched directly, which implies an assumption that it is at least ASCII compatible, but where UTF-8 is most useful. In this scenario, encoding errors are not detected. In this case, ripgrep's output will match the input exactly, byte-for-byte. This design may not be optimal in all cases, but it has some advantages: 1. In the happy path ("UTF-8 everywhere") remains happy. I have not been able to witness any performance regressions. 2. In the non-UTF-8 path, implementation complexity is kept relatively low. The cost here is transcoding itself. A potentially superior implementation might build decoding of any encoding into the regex engine itself. In particular, the fundamental problem with transcoding everything first is that literal optimizations are nearly negated. Future work should entail improving the user experience. For example, we might want to auto-detect more text encodings. A more elaborate UX experience might permit end users to specify multiple text encodings, although this seems hard to pull off in an ergonomic way. Fixes #1
2017-03-09 03:22:48 +02:00
]
[[package]]
name = "encoding_rs_io"
version = "0.1.7"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "1cc3c5651fb62ab8aa3103998dade57efdd028544bd300516baa31840c252a83"
dependencies = [
"encoding_rs",
]
[[package]]
name = "glob"
version = "0.3.1"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "d2fabcfbdc87f4758337ca535fb41a6d701b65693ce38287d856d1674551ec9b"
[[package]]
name = "globset"
2023-08-05 15:34:36 +02:00
version = "0.4.13"
dependencies = [
"aho-corasick",
"bstr",
"glob",
"log",
"regex-automata",
"regex-syntax",
"serde",
"serde_json",
]
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "grep"
2023-05-16 19:12:45 +02:00
version = "0.2.12"
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
dependencies = [
"grep-cli",
"grep-matcher",
"grep-pcre2",
"grep-printer",
"grep-regex",
"grep-searcher",
"termcolor",
"walkdir",
]
[[package]]
name = "grep-cli"
2023-07-18 19:25:23 +02:00
version = "0.1.9"
dependencies = [
"bstr",
"globset",
"libc",
"log",
"termcolor",
"winapi-util",
]
[[package]]
name = "grep-matcher"
2023-01-05 16:00:33 +02:00
version = "0.1.6"
dependencies = [
"memchr",
"regex",
]
[[package]]
name = "grep-pcre2"
2023-01-05 16:05:59 +02:00
version = "0.1.6"
dependencies = [
"grep-matcher",
"log",
"pcre2",
]
[[package]]
name = "grep-printer"
2023-01-05 16:11:16 +02:00
version = "0.1.7"
dependencies = [
"bstr",
"grep-matcher",
"grep-regex",
"grep-searcher",
hyperlink: rejigger how hyperlinks work This essentially takes the work done in #2483 and does a bit of a facelift. A brief summary: * We reduce the hyperlink API we expose to just the format, a configuration and an environment. * We move buffer management into a hyperlink-specific interpolator. * We expand the documentation on --hyperlink-format. * We rewrite the hyperlink format parser to be a simple state machine with support for escaping '{{' and '}}'. * We remove the 'gethostname' dependency and instead insist on the caller to provide the hostname. (So grep-printer doesn't get it itself, but the application will.) Similarly for the WSL prefix. * Probably some other things. Overall, the general structure of #2483 was kept. The biggest change is probably requiring the caller to pass in things like a hostname instead of having the crate do it. I did this for a couple reasons: 1. I feel uncomfortable with code deep inside the printing logic reaching out into the environment to assume responsibility for retrieving the hostname. This feels more like an application-level responsibility. Arguably, path canonicalization falls into this same bucket, but it is more difficult to rip that out. (And we can do it in the future in a backwards compatible fashion I think.) 2. I wanted to permit end users to tell ripgrep about their system's hostname in their own way, e.g., by running a custom executable. I want this because I know at least for my own use cases, I sometimes log into systems using an SSH hostname that is distinct from the system's actual hostname (usually because the system is shared in some way or changing its hostname is not allowed/practical). I think that's about it. Closes #665, Closes #2483
2023-09-22 20:57:44 +02:00
"log",
"serde",
"serde_json",
"termcolor",
]
[[package]]
name = "grep-regex"
2023-01-05 16:02:55 +02:00
version = "0.1.11"
dependencies = [
"bstr",
"grep-matcher",
"log",
"regex-automata",
"regex-syntax",
]
[[package]]
name = "grep-searcher"
2023-01-05 16:07:09 +02:00
version = "0.1.11"
dependencies = [
"bstr",
"encoding_rs",
"encoding_rs_io",
"grep-matcher",
"grep-regex",
"log",
"memchr",
"memmap2",
"regex",
]
[[package]]
name = "ignore"
2023-01-15 15:21:02 +02:00
version = "0.4.20"
dependencies = [
"bstr",
"crossbeam-channel",
"crossbeam-deque",
"globset",
"log",
"memchr",
"regex-automata",
"same-file",
"walkdir",
"winapi-util",
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
]
[[package]]
name = "itoa"
2023-08-15 17:09:46 +02:00
version = "1.0.9"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-08-15 17:09:46 +02:00
checksum = "af150ab688ff2122fcef229be89cb50dd66af9e01a4ff320cc137eecc9bacc38"
[[package]]
name = "jemalloc-sys"
2023-08-15 17:09:46 +02:00
version = "0.5.4+5.3.0-patched"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-08-15 17:09:46 +02:00
checksum = "ac6c1946e1cea1788cbfde01c993b52a10e2da07f4bac608228d1bed20bfebf2"
dependencies = [
"cc",
"libc",
]
[[package]]
name = "jemallocator"
2023-08-15 17:09:46 +02:00
version = "0.5.4"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-08-15 17:09:46 +02:00
checksum = "a0de374a9f8e63150e6f5e8a60cc14c668226d7a347d8aee1a45766e3c4dd3bc"
dependencies = [
"jemalloc-sys",
"libc",
]
[[package]]
name = "jobserver"
version = "0.1.27"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "8c37f63953c4c63420ed5fd3d6d398c719489b9f872b9fa683262f8edd363c7d"
dependencies = [
"libc",
]
cli: replace clap with lexopt and supporting code ripgrep began it's life with docopt for argument parsing. Then it moved to Clap and stayed there for a number of years. Clap has served ripgrep well, and it probably could continue to serve ripgrep well, but I ended up deciding to move off of it. Why? The first time I had the thought of moving off of Clap was during the 2->3->4 transition. I thought the 3.x and 4.x releases were great, but for me, it ended up moving a little too quickly. Since the release of 4.x was telegraphed around when 3.x came out, I decided to just hold off and wait to migrate to 4.x instead of doing a 3.x migration followed shortly by another 4.x migration. Of course, I just never ended up doing the migration at all. I never got around to it and there just wasn't a compelling reason for me to upgrade. While I never investigated it, I saw an upgrade as a non-trivial amount of work in part because I didn't encapsulate the usage of Clap enough. The above is just what got me started thinking about it. It wasn't enough to get me to move off of it on its own. What ended up pushing me over the edge was a combination of factors: * As mentioned above, I didn't want to run on the migration treadmill. This has proven to not be much of an issue, but at the time of the 2->3->4 releases, I didn't know how long Clap 4.x would be out before a 5.x would come out. * The release of lexopt[1] caught my eye. IMO, that crate demonstrates exactly how something new can arrive on the scene and just thoroughly solve a problem minimalistically. It has the docs, the reasoning, the simple API, the tests and good judgment. It gets all the weird corner cases right that Clap also gets right (and is part of why I was originally attracted to Clap). * I have an overall desire to reduce the size of my dependency tree. In part because a smaller dependency tree tends to correlate with better compile times, but also in part because it reduces my reliance and trust on others. It lets me be the "master" of ripgrep's destiny by reducing the amount of behavior that is the result of someone else's decision (whether good or bad). * I perceived that Clap solves a more general problem than what I actually need solved. Despite the vast number of flags that ripgrep has, its requirements are actually pretty simple. We just need simple switches and flags that support one value. No multi-value flags. No sub-commands. And probably a lot of other functionality that Clap has that makes it so flexible for so many different use cases. (I'm being hand wavy on the last point.) With all that said, perhaps most importantly, the future of ripgrep possibly demands a more flexible CLI argument parser. In today's world, I would really like, for example, flags like `--type` and `--type-not` to be able to accumulate their repeated values into a single sequence while respecting the order they appear on the CLI. For example, prior to this migration, `rg regex-automata -Tlock -ttoml` would not return results in `Cargo.lock` in this repository because the `-Tlock` always took priority even though `-ttoml` appeared after it. But with this migration, `-ttoml` now correctly overrides `-Tlock`. We would like to do similar things for `-g/--glob` and `--iglob` and potentially even now introduce a `-G/--glob-not` flag instead of requiring users to use `!` to negate a glob. (Which I had done originally to work-around this problem.) And some day, I'd like to add some kind of boolean matching to ripgrep perhaps similar to how `git grep` does it. (Although I haven't thought too carefully on a design yet.) In order to do that, I perceive it would be difficult to implement correctly in Clap. I believe that this last point is possible to implement correctly in Clap 2.x, although it is awkward to do so. I have not looked closely enough at the Clap 4.x API to know whether it's still possible there. In any case, these were enough reasons to move off of Clap and own more of the argument parsing process myself. This did require a few things: * I had to write my own logic for how arguments are combined into one single state object. Of course, I wanted this. This was part of the upside. But it's still code I didn't have to write for Clap. * I had to write my own shell completion generator. * I had to write my own `-h/--help` output generator. * I also had to write my own man page generator. Well, I had to do this with Clap 2.x too, although my understanding is that Clap 4.x supports this. With that said, without having tried it, my guess is that I probably wouldn't have liked the output it generated because I ultimately had to write most of the roff by hand myself to get the man page I wanted. (This also had the benefit of dropping the build dependency on asciidoc/asciidoctor.) While this is definitely a fair bit of extra work, it overall only cost me a couple days. IMO, that's a good trade off given that this code is unlikely to change again in any substantial way. And it should also allow for more flexible semantics going forward. Fixes #884, Fixes #1648, Fixes #1701, Fixes #1814, Fixes #1966 [1]: https://docs.rs/lexopt/0.3.0/lexopt/index.html
2023-10-17 00:05:39 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "lexopt"
version = "0.3.0"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "baff4b617f7df3d896f97fe922b64817f6cd9a756bb81d40f8883f2f66dcb401"
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "libc"
2023-11-26 20:28:30 +02:00
version = "0.2.150"
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-11-26 20:28:30 +02:00
checksum = "89d92a4743f9a61002fae18374ed11e7973f530cb3a3255fb354818118b2203c"
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "libm"
2023-10-10 00:23:43 +02:00
version = "0.2.8"
2017-10-22 00:45:39 +02:00
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-10-10 00:23:43 +02:00
checksum = "4ec2a862134d2a7d32d7983ddcdd1c4923530833c9f2ea1a44fc5fa473989058"
2017-10-22 00:45:39 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "log"
2023-08-15 17:09:46 +02:00
version = "0.4.20"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-08-15 17:09:46 +02:00
checksum = "b5e6163cb8c49088c2c36f57875e58ccd8c87c7427f7fbd50ea6710b2f3f2e8f"
2017-10-22 00:45:39 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "memchr"
2023-10-10 00:23:36 +02:00
version = "2.6.4"
2016-12-30 22:43:29 +02:00
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-10-10 00:23:36 +02:00
checksum = "f665ee40bc4a3c5590afb1e9677db74a508659dfd71e126420da8274909a0167"
2016-12-30 22:43:29 +02:00
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "memmap2"
version = "0.8.0"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "43a5a03cefb0d953ec0be133036f14e109412fa594edc2f77227249db66cc3ed"
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
dependencies = [
"libc",
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
]
[[package]]
name = "memoffset"
version = "0.9.0"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "5a634b1c61a95585bd15607c6ab0c4e5b226e695ff2800ba0cdccddf208c406c"
dependencies = [
"autocfg",
]
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "num-traits"
2023-10-10 00:23:43 +02:00
version = "0.2.17"
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-10-10 00:23:43 +02:00
checksum = "39e3200413f237f41ab11ad6d161bc7239c84dcb631773ccd7de3dfe4b5c267c"
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
dependencies = [
"autocfg",
"libm",
]
[[package]]
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
name = "packed_simd"
version = "0.3.9"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
checksum = "1f9f08af0c877571712e2e3e686ad79efad9657dbf0f7c3c8ba943ff6c38932d"
dependencies = [
"cfg-if",
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
"num-traits",
]
[[package]]
name = "pcre2"
2023-11-26 20:28:01 +02:00
version = "0.2.6"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-11-26 20:28:01 +02:00
checksum = "4c9d53a8ea5fc3d3568d3de4bebc12606fd0eb8234c602576f1f1ee4880488a7"
dependencies = [
"libc",
"log",
"pcre2-sys",
]
[[package]]
name = "pcre2-sys"
2023-11-26 20:28:01 +02:00
version = "0.2.7"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-11-26 20:28:01 +02:00
checksum = "8f8f5556f23cf2c0b481949fdfc19a7cd9b27ddcb00ef3477b0f4935cbdaedf2"
dependencies = [
"cc",
"libc",
"pkg-config",
]
[[package]]
name = "pkg-config"
version = "0.3.27"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "26072860ba924cbfa98ea39c8c19b4dd6a4a25423dbdf219c1eca91aa0cf6964"
[[package]]
name = "proc-macro2"
2023-11-26 20:28:30 +02:00
version = "1.0.70"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-11-26 20:28:30 +02:00
checksum = "39278fbbf5fb4f646ce651690877f89d1c5811a3d4acb27700c1cb3cdb78fd3b"
dependencies = [
"unicode-ident",
]
[[package]]
name = "quote"
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
version = "1.0.33"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-08-29 02:00:41 +02:00
checksum = "5267fca4496028628a95160fc423a33e8b2e6af8a5302579e322e4b520293cae"
dependencies = [
"proc-macro2",
]
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "regex"
2023-10-17 00:12:59 +02:00
version = "1.10.2"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-10-17 00:12:59 +02:00
checksum = "380b951a9c5e80ddfd6136919eef32310721aa4aacd4889a8d39124b026ab343"
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
dependencies = [
"aho-corasick",
"memchr",
"regex-automata",
"regex-syntax",
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
]
[[package]]
name = "regex-automata"
2023-10-17 00:12:59 +02:00
version = "0.4.3"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-10-17 00:12:59 +02:00
checksum = "5f804c7828047e88b2d32e2d7fe5a105da8ee3264f01902f796c8e067dc2483f"
dependencies = [
"aho-corasick",
"memchr",
"regex-syntax",
]
[[package]]
name = "regex-syntax"
version = "0.8.2"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "c08c74e62047bb2de4ff487b251e4a92e24f48745648451635cec7d591162d9f"
[[package]]
name = "ripgrep"
2021-06-12 14:12:24 +02:00
version = "13.0.0"
dependencies = [
"anyhow",
"bstr",
"grep",
"ignore",
"jemallocator",
cli: replace clap with lexopt and supporting code ripgrep began it's life with docopt for argument parsing. Then it moved to Clap and stayed there for a number of years. Clap has served ripgrep well, and it probably could continue to serve ripgrep well, but I ended up deciding to move off of it. Why? The first time I had the thought of moving off of Clap was during the 2->3->4 transition. I thought the 3.x and 4.x releases were great, but for me, it ended up moving a little too quickly. Since the release of 4.x was telegraphed around when 3.x came out, I decided to just hold off and wait to migrate to 4.x instead of doing a 3.x migration followed shortly by another 4.x migration. Of course, I just never ended up doing the migration at all. I never got around to it and there just wasn't a compelling reason for me to upgrade. While I never investigated it, I saw an upgrade as a non-trivial amount of work in part because I didn't encapsulate the usage of Clap enough. The above is just what got me started thinking about it. It wasn't enough to get me to move off of it on its own. What ended up pushing me over the edge was a combination of factors: * As mentioned above, I didn't want to run on the migration treadmill. This has proven to not be much of an issue, but at the time of the 2->3->4 releases, I didn't know how long Clap 4.x would be out before a 5.x would come out. * The release of lexopt[1] caught my eye. IMO, that crate demonstrates exactly how something new can arrive on the scene and just thoroughly solve a problem minimalistically. It has the docs, the reasoning, the simple API, the tests and good judgment. It gets all the weird corner cases right that Clap also gets right (and is part of why I was originally attracted to Clap). * I have an overall desire to reduce the size of my dependency tree. In part because a smaller dependency tree tends to correlate with better compile times, but also in part because it reduces my reliance and trust on others. It lets me be the "master" of ripgrep's destiny by reducing the amount of behavior that is the result of someone else's decision (whether good or bad). * I perceived that Clap solves a more general problem than what I actually need solved. Despite the vast number of flags that ripgrep has, its requirements are actually pretty simple. We just need simple switches and flags that support one value. No multi-value flags. No sub-commands. And probably a lot of other functionality that Clap has that makes it so flexible for so many different use cases. (I'm being hand wavy on the last point.) With all that said, perhaps most importantly, the future of ripgrep possibly demands a more flexible CLI argument parser. In today's world, I would really like, for example, flags like `--type` and `--type-not` to be able to accumulate their repeated values into a single sequence while respecting the order they appear on the CLI. For example, prior to this migration, `rg regex-automata -Tlock -ttoml` would not return results in `Cargo.lock` in this repository because the `-Tlock` always took priority even though `-ttoml` appeared after it. But with this migration, `-ttoml` now correctly overrides `-Tlock`. We would like to do similar things for `-g/--glob` and `--iglob` and potentially even now introduce a `-G/--glob-not` flag instead of requiring users to use `!` to negate a glob. (Which I had done originally to work-around this problem.) And some day, I'd like to add some kind of boolean matching to ripgrep perhaps similar to how `git grep` does it. (Although I haven't thought too carefully on a design yet.) In order to do that, I perceive it would be difficult to implement correctly in Clap. I believe that this last point is possible to implement correctly in Clap 2.x, although it is awkward to do so. I have not looked closely enough at the Clap 4.x API to know whether it's still possible there. In any case, these were enough reasons to move off of Clap and own more of the argument parsing process myself. This did require a few things: * I had to write my own logic for how arguments are combined into one single state object. Of course, I wanted this. This was part of the upside. But it's still code I didn't have to write for Clap. * I had to write my own shell completion generator. * I had to write my own `-h/--help` output generator. * I also had to write my own man page generator. Well, I had to do this with Clap 2.x too, although my understanding is that Clap 4.x supports this. With that said, without having tried it, my guess is that I probably wouldn't have liked the output it generated because I ultimately had to write most of the roff by hand myself to get the man page I wanted. (This also had the benefit of dropping the build dependency on asciidoc/asciidoctor.) While this is definitely a fair bit of extra work, it overall only cost me a couple days. IMO, that's a good trade off given that this code is unlikely to change again in any substantial way. And it should also allow for more flexible semantics going forward. Fixes #884, Fixes #1648, Fixes #1701, Fixes #1814, Fixes #1966 [1]: https://docs.rs/lexopt/0.3.0/lexopt/index.html
2023-10-17 00:05:39 +02:00
"lexopt",
"log",
"serde",
"serde_derive",
"serde_json",
"termcolor",
cli: replace clap with lexopt and supporting code ripgrep began it's life with docopt for argument parsing. Then it moved to Clap and stayed there for a number of years. Clap has served ripgrep well, and it probably could continue to serve ripgrep well, but I ended up deciding to move off of it. Why? The first time I had the thought of moving off of Clap was during the 2->3->4 transition. I thought the 3.x and 4.x releases were great, but for me, it ended up moving a little too quickly. Since the release of 4.x was telegraphed around when 3.x came out, I decided to just hold off and wait to migrate to 4.x instead of doing a 3.x migration followed shortly by another 4.x migration. Of course, I just never ended up doing the migration at all. I never got around to it and there just wasn't a compelling reason for me to upgrade. While I never investigated it, I saw an upgrade as a non-trivial amount of work in part because I didn't encapsulate the usage of Clap enough. The above is just what got me started thinking about it. It wasn't enough to get me to move off of it on its own. What ended up pushing me over the edge was a combination of factors: * As mentioned above, I didn't want to run on the migration treadmill. This has proven to not be much of an issue, but at the time of the 2->3->4 releases, I didn't know how long Clap 4.x would be out before a 5.x would come out. * The release of lexopt[1] caught my eye. IMO, that crate demonstrates exactly how something new can arrive on the scene and just thoroughly solve a problem minimalistically. It has the docs, the reasoning, the simple API, the tests and good judgment. It gets all the weird corner cases right that Clap also gets right (and is part of why I was originally attracted to Clap). * I have an overall desire to reduce the size of my dependency tree. In part because a smaller dependency tree tends to correlate with better compile times, but also in part because it reduces my reliance and trust on others. It lets me be the "master" of ripgrep's destiny by reducing the amount of behavior that is the result of someone else's decision (whether good or bad). * I perceived that Clap solves a more general problem than what I actually need solved. Despite the vast number of flags that ripgrep has, its requirements are actually pretty simple. We just need simple switches and flags that support one value. No multi-value flags. No sub-commands. And probably a lot of other functionality that Clap has that makes it so flexible for so many different use cases. (I'm being hand wavy on the last point.) With all that said, perhaps most importantly, the future of ripgrep possibly demands a more flexible CLI argument parser. In today's world, I would really like, for example, flags like `--type` and `--type-not` to be able to accumulate their repeated values into a single sequence while respecting the order they appear on the CLI. For example, prior to this migration, `rg regex-automata -Tlock -ttoml` would not return results in `Cargo.lock` in this repository because the `-Tlock` always took priority even though `-ttoml` appeared after it. But with this migration, `-ttoml` now correctly overrides `-Tlock`. We would like to do similar things for `-g/--glob` and `--iglob` and potentially even now introduce a `-G/--glob-not` flag instead of requiring users to use `!` to negate a glob. (Which I had done originally to work-around this problem.) And some day, I'd like to add some kind of boolean matching to ripgrep perhaps similar to how `git grep` does it. (Although I haven't thought too carefully on a design yet.) In order to do that, I perceive it would be difficult to implement correctly in Clap. I believe that this last point is possible to implement correctly in Clap 2.x, although it is awkward to do so. I have not looked closely enough at the Clap 4.x API to know whether it's still possible there. In any case, these were enough reasons to move off of Clap and own more of the argument parsing process myself. This did require a few things: * I had to write my own logic for how arguments are combined into one single state object. Of course, I wanted this. This was part of the upside. But it's still code I didn't have to write for Clap. * I had to write my own shell completion generator. * I had to write my own `-h/--help` output generator. * I also had to write my own man page generator. Well, I had to do this with Clap 2.x too, although my understanding is that Clap 4.x supports this. With that said, without having tried it, my guess is that I probably wouldn't have liked the output it generated because I ultimately had to write most of the roff by hand myself to get the man page I wanted. (This also had the benefit of dropping the build dependency on asciidoc/asciidoctor.) While this is definitely a fair bit of extra work, it overall only cost me a couple days. IMO, that's a good trade off given that this code is unlikely to change again in any substantial way. And it should also allow for more flexible semantics going forward. Fixes #884, Fixes #1648, Fixes #1701, Fixes #1814, Fixes #1966 [1]: https://docs.rs/lexopt/0.3.0/lexopt/index.html
2023-10-17 00:05:39 +02:00
"textwrap",
"walkdir",
]
[[package]]
name = "ryu"
2023-08-15 17:09:46 +02:00
version = "1.0.15"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-08-15 17:09:46 +02:00
checksum = "1ad4cc8da4ef723ed60bced201181d83791ad433213d8c24efffda1eec85d741"
[[package]]
name = "same-file"
2020-01-17 02:47:23 +02:00
version = "1.0.6"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "93fc1dc3aaa9bfed95e02e6eadabb4baf7e3078b0bd1b4d7b6b0b68378900502"
dependencies = [
"winapi-util",
]
[[package]]
name = "scopeguard"
version = "1.2.0"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "94143f37725109f92c262ed2cf5e59bce7498c01bcc1502d7b9afe439a4e9f49"
[[package]]
name = "serde"
version = "1.0.193"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "25dd9975e68d0cb5aa1120c288333fc98731bd1dd12f561e468ea4728c042b89"
dependencies = [
"serde_derive",
]
[[package]]
name = "serde_derive"
version = "1.0.193"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "43576ca501357b9b071ac53cdc7da8ef0cbd9493d8df094cd821777ea6e894d3"
dependencies = [
"proc-macro2",
"quote",
"syn",
]
[[package]]
name = "serde_json"
2023-11-26 20:28:30 +02:00
version = "1.0.108"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-11-26 20:28:30 +02:00
checksum = "3d1c7e3eac408d115102c4c24ad393e0821bb3a5df4d506a80f85f7a742a526b"
dependencies = [
"itoa",
"ryu",
"serde",
]
[[package]]
name = "syn"
2023-11-26 20:28:30 +02:00
version = "2.0.39"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
2023-11-26 20:28:30 +02:00
checksum = "23e78b90f2fcf45d3e842032ce32e3f2d1545ba6636271dcbf24fa306d87be7a"
dependencies = [
"proc-macro2",
"quote",
"unicode-ident",
]
[[package]]
name = "termcolor"
cli: replace clap with lexopt and supporting code ripgrep began it's life with docopt for argument parsing. Then it moved to Clap and stayed there for a number of years. Clap has served ripgrep well, and it probably could continue to serve ripgrep well, but I ended up deciding to move off of it. Why? The first time I had the thought of moving off of Clap was during the 2->3->4 transition. I thought the 3.x and 4.x releases were great, but for me, it ended up moving a little too quickly. Since the release of 4.x was telegraphed around when 3.x came out, I decided to just hold off and wait to migrate to 4.x instead of doing a 3.x migration followed shortly by another 4.x migration. Of course, I just never ended up doing the migration at all. I never got around to it and there just wasn't a compelling reason for me to upgrade. While I never investigated it, I saw an upgrade as a non-trivial amount of work in part because I didn't encapsulate the usage of Clap enough. The above is just what got me started thinking about it. It wasn't enough to get me to move off of it on its own. What ended up pushing me over the edge was a combination of factors: * As mentioned above, I didn't want to run on the migration treadmill. This has proven to not be much of an issue, but at the time of the 2->3->4 releases, I didn't know how long Clap 4.x would be out before a 5.x would come out. * The release of lexopt[1] caught my eye. IMO, that crate demonstrates exactly how something new can arrive on the scene and just thoroughly solve a problem minimalistically. It has the docs, the reasoning, the simple API, the tests and good judgment. It gets all the weird corner cases right that Clap also gets right (and is part of why I was originally attracted to Clap). * I have an overall desire to reduce the size of my dependency tree. In part because a smaller dependency tree tends to correlate with better compile times, but also in part because it reduces my reliance and trust on others. It lets me be the "master" of ripgrep's destiny by reducing the amount of behavior that is the result of someone else's decision (whether good or bad). * I perceived that Clap solves a more general problem than what I actually need solved. Despite the vast number of flags that ripgrep has, its requirements are actually pretty simple. We just need simple switches and flags that support one value. No multi-value flags. No sub-commands. And probably a lot of other functionality that Clap has that makes it so flexible for so many different use cases. (I'm being hand wavy on the last point.) With all that said, perhaps most importantly, the future of ripgrep possibly demands a more flexible CLI argument parser. In today's world, I would really like, for example, flags like `--type` and `--type-not` to be able to accumulate their repeated values into a single sequence while respecting the order they appear on the CLI. For example, prior to this migration, `rg regex-automata -Tlock -ttoml` would not return results in `Cargo.lock` in this repository because the `-Tlock` always took priority even though `-ttoml` appeared after it. But with this migration, `-ttoml` now correctly overrides `-Tlock`. We would like to do similar things for `-g/--glob` and `--iglob` and potentially even now introduce a `-G/--glob-not` flag instead of requiring users to use `!` to negate a glob. (Which I had done originally to work-around this problem.) And some day, I'd like to add some kind of boolean matching to ripgrep perhaps similar to how `git grep` does it. (Although I haven't thought too carefully on a design yet.) In order to do that, I perceive it would be difficult to implement correctly in Clap. I believe that this last point is possible to implement correctly in Clap 2.x, although it is awkward to do so. I have not looked closely enough at the Clap 4.x API to know whether it's still possible there. In any case, these were enough reasons to move off of Clap and own more of the argument parsing process myself. This did require a few things: * I had to write my own logic for how arguments are combined into one single state object. Of course, I wanted this. This was part of the upside. But it's still code I didn't have to write for Clap. * I had to write my own shell completion generator. * I had to write my own `-h/--help` output generator. * I also had to write my own man page generator. Well, I had to do this with Clap 2.x too, although my understanding is that Clap 4.x supports this. With that said, without having tried it, my guess is that I probably wouldn't have liked the output it generated because I ultimately had to write most of the roff by hand myself to get the man page I wanted. (This also had the benefit of dropping the build dependency on asciidoc/asciidoctor.) While this is definitely a fair bit of extra work, it overall only cost me a couple days. IMO, that's a good trade off given that this code is unlikely to change again in any substantial way. And it should also allow for more flexible semantics going forward. Fixes #884, Fixes #1648, Fixes #1701, Fixes #1814, Fixes #1966 [1]: https://docs.rs/lexopt/0.3.0/lexopt/index.html
2023-10-17 00:05:39 +02:00
version = "1.4.0"
2018-07-18 00:37:02 +02:00
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
cli: replace clap with lexopt and supporting code ripgrep began it's life with docopt for argument parsing. Then it moved to Clap and stayed there for a number of years. Clap has served ripgrep well, and it probably could continue to serve ripgrep well, but I ended up deciding to move off of it. Why? The first time I had the thought of moving off of Clap was during the 2->3->4 transition. I thought the 3.x and 4.x releases were great, but for me, it ended up moving a little too quickly. Since the release of 4.x was telegraphed around when 3.x came out, I decided to just hold off and wait to migrate to 4.x instead of doing a 3.x migration followed shortly by another 4.x migration. Of course, I just never ended up doing the migration at all. I never got around to it and there just wasn't a compelling reason for me to upgrade. While I never investigated it, I saw an upgrade as a non-trivial amount of work in part because I didn't encapsulate the usage of Clap enough. The above is just what got me started thinking about it. It wasn't enough to get me to move off of it on its own. What ended up pushing me over the edge was a combination of factors: * As mentioned above, I didn't want to run on the migration treadmill. This has proven to not be much of an issue, but at the time of the 2->3->4 releases, I didn't know how long Clap 4.x would be out before a 5.x would come out. * The release of lexopt[1] caught my eye. IMO, that crate demonstrates exactly how something new can arrive on the scene and just thoroughly solve a problem minimalistically. It has the docs, the reasoning, the simple API, the tests and good judgment. It gets all the weird corner cases right that Clap also gets right (and is part of why I was originally attracted to Clap). * I have an overall desire to reduce the size of my dependency tree. In part because a smaller dependency tree tends to correlate with better compile times, but also in part because it reduces my reliance and trust on others. It lets me be the "master" of ripgrep's destiny by reducing the amount of behavior that is the result of someone else's decision (whether good or bad). * I perceived that Clap solves a more general problem than what I actually need solved. Despite the vast number of flags that ripgrep has, its requirements are actually pretty simple. We just need simple switches and flags that support one value. No multi-value flags. No sub-commands. And probably a lot of other functionality that Clap has that makes it so flexible for so many different use cases. (I'm being hand wavy on the last point.) With all that said, perhaps most importantly, the future of ripgrep possibly demands a more flexible CLI argument parser. In today's world, I would really like, for example, flags like `--type` and `--type-not` to be able to accumulate their repeated values into a single sequence while respecting the order they appear on the CLI. For example, prior to this migration, `rg regex-automata -Tlock -ttoml` would not return results in `Cargo.lock` in this repository because the `-Tlock` always took priority even though `-ttoml` appeared after it. But with this migration, `-ttoml` now correctly overrides `-Tlock`. We would like to do similar things for `-g/--glob` and `--iglob` and potentially even now introduce a `-G/--glob-not` flag instead of requiring users to use `!` to negate a glob. (Which I had done originally to work-around this problem.) And some day, I'd like to add some kind of boolean matching to ripgrep perhaps similar to how `git grep` does it. (Although I haven't thought too carefully on a design yet.) In order to do that, I perceive it would be difficult to implement correctly in Clap. I believe that this last point is possible to implement correctly in Clap 2.x, although it is awkward to do so. I have not looked closely enough at the Clap 4.x API to know whether it's still possible there. In any case, these were enough reasons to move off of Clap and own more of the argument parsing process myself. This did require a few things: * I had to write my own logic for how arguments are combined into one single state object. Of course, I wanted this. This was part of the upside. But it's still code I didn't have to write for Clap. * I had to write my own shell completion generator. * I had to write my own `-h/--help` output generator. * I also had to write my own man page generator. Well, I had to do this with Clap 2.x too, although my understanding is that Clap 4.x supports this. With that said, without having tried it, my guess is that I probably wouldn't have liked the output it generated because I ultimately had to write most of the roff by hand myself to get the man page I wanted. (This also had the benefit of dropping the build dependency on asciidoc/asciidoctor.) While this is definitely a fair bit of extra work, it overall only cost me a couple days. IMO, that's a good trade off given that this code is unlikely to change again in any substantial way. And it should also allow for more flexible semantics going forward. Fixes #884, Fixes #1648, Fixes #1701, Fixes #1814, Fixes #1966 [1]: https://docs.rs/lexopt/0.3.0/lexopt/index.html
2023-10-17 00:05:39 +02:00
checksum = "ff1bc3d3f05aff0403e8ac0d92ced918ec05b666a43f83297ccef5bea8a3d449"
dependencies = [
"winapi-util",
]
2017-07-31 00:04:49 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "textwrap"
cli: replace clap with lexopt and supporting code ripgrep began it's life with docopt for argument parsing. Then it moved to Clap and stayed there for a number of years. Clap has served ripgrep well, and it probably could continue to serve ripgrep well, but I ended up deciding to move off of it. Why? The first time I had the thought of moving off of Clap was during the 2->3->4 transition. I thought the 3.x and 4.x releases were great, but for me, it ended up moving a little too quickly. Since the release of 4.x was telegraphed around when 3.x came out, I decided to just hold off and wait to migrate to 4.x instead of doing a 3.x migration followed shortly by another 4.x migration. Of course, I just never ended up doing the migration at all. I never got around to it and there just wasn't a compelling reason for me to upgrade. While I never investigated it, I saw an upgrade as a non-trivial amount of work in part because I didn't encapsulate the usage of Clap enough. The above is just what got me started thinking about it. It wasn't enough to get me to move off of it on its own. What ended up pushing me over the edge was a combination of factors: * As mentioned above, I didn't want to run on the migration treadmill. This has proven to not be much of an issue, but at the time of the 2->3->4 releases, I didn't know how long Clap 4.x would be out before a 5.x would come out. * The release of lexopt[1] caught my eye. IMO, that crate demonstrates exactly how something new can arrive on the scene and just thoroughly solve a problem minimalistically. It has the docs, the reasoning, the simple API, the tests and good judgment. It gets all the weird corner cases right that Clap also gets right (and is part of why I was originally attracted to Clap). * I have an overall desire to reduce the size of my dependency tree. In part because a smaller dependency tree tends to correlate with better compile times, but also in part because it reduces my reliance and trust on others. It lets me be the "master" of ripgrep's destiny by reducing the amount of behavior that is the result of someone else's decision (whether good or bad). * I perceived that Clap solves a more general problem than what I actually need solved. Despite the vast number of flags that ripgrep has, its requirements are actually pretty simple. We just need simple switches and flags that support one value. No multi-value flags. No sub-commands. And probably a lot of other functionality that Clap has that makes it so flexible for so many different use cases. (I'm being hand wavy on the last point.) With all that said, perhaps most importantly, the future of ripgrep possibly demands a more flexible CLI argument parser. In today's world, I would really like, for example, flags like `--type` and `--type-not` to be able to accumulate their repeated values into a single sequence while respecting the order they appear on the CLI. For example, prior to this migration, `rg regex-automata -Tlock -ttoml` would not return results in `Cargo.lock` in this repository because the `-Tlock` always took priority even though `-ttoml` appeared after it. But with this migration, `-ttoml` now correctly overrides `-Tlock`. We would like to do similar things for `-g/--glob` and `--iglob` and potentially even now introduce a `-G/--glob-not` flag instead of requiring users to use `!` to negate a glob. (Which I had done originally to work-around this problem.) And some day, I'd like to add some kind of boolean matching to ripgrep perhaps similar to how `git grep` does it. (Although I haven't thought too carefully on a design yet.) In order to do that, I perceive it would be difficult to implement correctly in Clap. I believe that this last point is possible to implement correctly in Clap 2.x, although it is awkward to do so. I have not looked closely enough at the Clap 4.x API to know whether it's still possible there. In any case, these were enough reasons to move off of Clap and own more of the argument parsing process myself. This did require a few things: * I had to write my own logic for how arguments are combined into one single state object. Of course, I wanted this. This was part of the upside. But it's still code I didn't have to write for Clap. * I had to write my own shell completion generator. * I had to write my own `-h/--help` output generator. * I also had to write my own man page generator. Well, I had to do this with Clap 2.x too, although my understanding is that Clap 4.x supports this. With that said, without having tried it, my guess is that I probably wouldn't have liked the output it generated because I ultimately had to write most of the roff by hand myself to get the man page I wanted. (This also had the benefit of dropping the build dependency on asciidoc/asciidoctor.) While this is definitely a fair bit of extra work, it overall only cost me a couple days. IMO, that's a good trade off given that this code is unlikely to change again in any substantial way. And it should also allow for more flexible semantics going forward. Fixes #884, Fixes #1648, Fixes #1701, Fixes #1814, Fixes #1966 [1]: https://docs.rs/lexopt/0.3.0/lexopt/index.html
2023-10-17 00:05:39 +02:00
version = "0.16.0"
2017-07-31 00:04:49 +02:00
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
cli: replace clap with lexopt and supporting code ripgrep began it's life with docopt for argument parsing. Then it moved to Clap and stayed there for a number of years. Clap has served ripgrep well, and it probably could continue to serve ripgrep well, but I ended up deciding to move off of it. Why? The first time I had the thought of moving off of Clap was during the 2->3->4 transition. I thought the 3.x and 4.x releases were great, but for me, it ended up moving a little too quickly. Since the release of 4.x was telegraphed around when 3.x came out, I decided to just hold off and wait to migrate to 4.x instead of doing a 3.x migration followed shortly by another 4.x migration. Of course, I just never ended up doing the migration at all. I never got around to it and there just wasn't a compelling reason for me to upgrade. While I never investigated it, I saw an upgrade as a non-trivial amount of work in part because I didn't encapsulate the usage of Clap enough. The above is just what got me started thinking about it. It wasn't enough to get me to move off of it on its own. What ended up pushing me over the edge was a combination of factors: * As mentioned above, I didn't want to run on the migration treadmill. This has proven to not be much of an issue, but at the time of the 2->3->4 releases, I didn't know how long Clap 4.x would be out before a 5.x would come out. * The release of lexopt[1] caught my eye. IMO, that crate demonstrates exactly how something new can arrive on the scene and just thoroughly solve a problem minimalistically. It has the docs, the reasoning, the simple API, the tests and good judgment. It gets all the weird corner cases right that Clap also gets right (and is part of why I was originally attracted to Clap). * I have an overall desire to reduce the size of my dependency tree. In part because a smaller dependency tree tends to correlate with better compile times, but also in part because it reduces my reliance and trust on others. It lets me be the "master" of ripgrep's destiny by reducing the amount of behavior that is the result of someone else's decision (whether good or bad). * I perceived that Clap solves a more general problem than what I actually need solved. Despite the vast number of flags that ripgrep has, its requirements are actually pretty simple. We just need simple switches and flags that support one value. No multi-value flags. No sub-commands. And probably a lot of other functionality that Clap has that makes it so flexible for so many different use cases. (I'm being hand wavy on the last point.) With all that said, perhaps most importantly, the future of ripgrep possibly demands a more flexible CLI argument parser. In today's world, I would really like, for example, flags like `--type` and `--type-not` to be able to accumulate their repeated values into a single sequence while respecting the order they appear on the CLI. For example, prior to this migration, `rg regex-automata -Tlock -ttoml` would not return results in `Cargo.lock` in this repository because the `-Tlock` always took priority even though `-ttoml` appeared after it. But with this migration, `-ttoml` now correctly overrides `-Tlock`. We would like to do similar things for `-g/--glob` and `--iglob` and potentially even now introduce a `-G/--glob-not` flag instead of requiring users to use `!` to negate a glob. (Which I had done originally to work-around this problem.) And some day, I'd like to add some kind of boolean matching to ripgrep perhaps similar to how `git grep` does it. (Although I haven't thought too carefully on a design yet.) In order to do that, I perceive it would be difficult to implement correctly in Clap. I believe that this last point is possible to implement correctly in Clap 2.x, although it is awkward to do so. I have not looked closely enough at the Clap 4.x API to know whether it's still possible there. In any case, these were enough reasons to move off of Clap and own more of the argument parsing process myself. This did require a few things: * I had to write my own logic for how arguments are combined into one single state object. Of course, I wanted this. This was part of the upside. But it's still code I didn't have to write for Clap. * I had to write my own shell completion generator. * I had to write my own `-h/--help` output generator. * I also had to write my own man page generator. Well, I had to do this with Clap 2.x too, although my understanding is that Clap 4.x supports this. With that said, without having tried it, my guess is that I probably wouldn't have liked the output it generated because I ultimately had to write most of the roff by hand myself to get the man page I wanted. (This also had the benefit of dropping the build dependency on asciidoc/asciidoctor.) While this is definitely a fair bit of extra work, it overall only cost me a couple days. IMO, that's a good trade off given that this code is unlikely to change again in any substantial way. And it should also allow for more flexible semantics going forward. Fixes #884, Fixes #1648, Fixes #1701, Fixes #1814, Fixes #1966 [1]: https://docs.rs/lexopt/0.3.0/lexopt/index.html
2023-10-17 00:05:39 +02:00
checksum = "222a222a5bfe1bba4a77b45ec488a741b3cb8872e5e499451fd7d0129c9c7c3d"
2017-07-31 00:04:49 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "unicode-ident"
version = "1.0.12"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "3354b9ac3fae1ff6755cb6db53683adb661634f67557942dea4facebec0fee4b"
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "walkdir"
version = "2.4.0"
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "d71d857dc86794ca4c280d616f7da00d2dbfd8cd788846559a6813e6aa4b54ee"
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
dependencies = [
"same-file",
"winapi-util",
2016-09-12 01:06:05 +02:00
]
2017-12-30 22:48:25 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "winapi"
version = "0.3.9"
2017-12-30 22:48:25 +02:00
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "5c839a674fcd7a98952e593242ea400abe93992746761e38641405d28b00f419"
2017-12-30 22:48:25 +02:00
dependencies = [
"winapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu",
"winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu",
2017-12-30 22:48:25 +02:00
]
[[package]]
name = "winapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu"
version = "0.4.0"
2017-12-30 22:48:25 +02:00
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "ac3b87c63620426dd9b991e5ce0329eff545bccbbb34f3be09ff6fb6ab51b7b6"
2017-12-30 22:48:25 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "winapi-util"
version = "0.1.6"
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "f29e6f9198ba0d26b4c9f07dbe6f9ed633e1f3d5b8b414090084349e46a52596"
dependencies = [
"winapi",
]
2017-12-30 22:48:25 +02:00
[[package]]
name = "winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu"
version = "0.4.0"
2017-12-30 22:48:25 +02:00
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
checksum = "712e227841d057c1ee1cd2fb22fa7e5a5461ae8e48fa2ca79ec42cfc1931183f"