rust/rustlings
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rustlings.git synced 2025-11-29 22:47:43 +02:00
Code Issues Releases Activity

update old book references to the second edition of the book

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Lisa Kosiachenko
2018-07-20 11:39:49 -07:00
parent 2fa0fa17f9
commit e48a1a063d
8 changed files with 22 additions and 18 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
error_handling/errors2.rs
View File

@@ -68,5 +68,5 @@ mod tests {
// `Err(something)`. This pattern is very common in Rust, though, so there's
// a `?` operator that does pretty much what you would make that match statement
// do for you! Take a look at this section of the Error Handling chapter:
// https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/second-edition/ch09-02-recoverable-errors-with-result.html#a-shortcut-for-propagating-errors-
// https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/second-edition/ch09-02-recoverable-errors-with-result.html#a-shortcut-for-propagating-errors-the--operator
// and give it a try!

2
error_handling/errorsn.rs
View File

@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ impl error::Error for CreationError {
// can be returned from the same function because all errors act the same
// since they all implement the `error::Error` trait.
// Check out this section of the book:
// https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/second-edition/ch09-02-recoverable-errors-with-result.html#a-shortcut-for-propagating-errors-
// https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/second-edition/ch09-02-recoverable-errors-with-result.html#a-shortcut-for-propagating-errors-the--operator
// Another another hint: Note that because the `?` operator returns
// the *unwrapped* value in the `Ok` case, if we want to return a `Result` from