2044: Vault/rspamd: don't return any key for relayed domains r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
enhancement
## What does this PR
Don't return any key for relayed domains. We may want to revisit this (ARC signing)... but in the meantime it saves from a scary message in rspamd.
```signing failure: cannot request data from the vault url: /internal/rspamd/vault/v1/dkim/ ...```
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
We may want to revisit this (ARC signing)... but in the meantime
it saves from a scary message in rspamd
signing failure: cannot request data from the vault url: /internal/rspamd/vault/v1/dkim/ ...
1754: centralize Webmail authentication behind the admin panel (SSO) r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
Enhancement: it centralizes the authentication of webmails to the admin interface.
## What does this PR do?
It implements the glue required for webmails to do SSO using the admin interface.
One of the main advantages of centralizing things this way is that it reduces significantly the attack surface available to an unauthenticated attacker (no webmail access until there is a valid Flask session).
Others include the ability to implement 2FA down the line and rate-limit things as required.
### Related issue(s)
- #783
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
1758: Implement a simpler credential cache (alternative to #1755) r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
Feature: it implements a credential cache to speedup authentication requests.
## What does this PR do?
Credentials are stored in cold-storage using a slow, salted/iterated hash function to prevent offline bruteforce attacks. This creates a performance bottleneck for no valid reason (see the
rationale/long version on https://github.com/Mailu/Mailu/issues/1194#issuecomment-762115549).
The new credential cache makes things fast again.
This is the simpler version of #1755 (with no new dependencies)
### Related issue(s)
- close#1411
- close#1194
- close#1755
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
1776: optimize generation of transport nexthop r=mergify[bot] a=ghostwheel42
## What type of PR?
bug-fix and enhancement.
## What does this PR do?
Possibly there should be more input validation when editing a relay, but for now this tries to make the best out of the existing "smtp" attribute while maintaining backwards compatibility. When relay is empty, the transport's nexthop is the MX of the relayed domain to fix#1588
```
RELAY NEXTHOP TRANSPORT
empty use MX of relay domain smtp:domain
:port use MX of relay domain and use port smtp:domain:port
target resolve A/AAAA of target smtp:[target]
target:port resolve A/AAAA of target and use port smtp:[target]:port
mx:target resolve MX of target smtp:target
mx:target:port resolve MX of target and use port smtp:target:port
lmtp:target resolve A/AAAA of target lmtp:target
lmtp:target:port resolve A/AAAA of target and use port lmtp:target:port
target can also be an IPv4 or IPv6 address (an IPv6 address must be enclosed in []: [2001:DB8::]).
```
When there is proper input validation and existing database entries are migrated this function can be made much shorter again.
### Related issue(s)
- closes#1588
- closes#1815
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [X] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Graf <ghostwheel42@users.noreply.github.com>
1296: fetchmail: print unhandled exceptions, but don't crash r=Nebukadneza a=Al2Klimov
fixes#1295
1322: Bump validators from 0.12.5 to 0.12.6 in /core/admin r=Nebukadneza a=dependabot[bot]
Bumps [validators](https://github.com/kvesteri/validators) from 0.12.5 to 0.12.6.
<details>
<summary>Changelog</summary>
*Sourced from [validators's changelog](https://github.com/kvesteri/validators/blob/master/CHANGES.rst).*
> 0.12.6 (2019-05-08)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> - Fixed domain validator for single character domains ([#118](https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/kvesteri/validators/issues/118), pull request courtesy kingbuzzman)
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
- See full diff in [compare view](https://github.com/kvesteri/validators/commits)
</details>
<br />
[![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=validators&package-manager=pip&previous-version=0.12.5&new-version=0.12.6)](https://help.github.com/articles/configuring-automated-security-fixes)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot ignore this [patch|minor|major] version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor/major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot use these labels` will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot use these reviewers` will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot use these assignees` will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot use this milestone` will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the [Security Alerts page](https://github.com/Mailu/Mailu/network/alerts).
</details>
1337: Add IPv6 to allow_nets r=Nebukadneza a=PhilRW
Roundcube was not connecting to sieve with IPv6 enabled.
Fixes#1336
1358: Add port to relay if it contains a colon r=Nebukadneza a=PhilRW
## What type of PR?
enhancement
## What does this PR do?
Allows relaying domains to non-standard SMTP ports by appending `:port` to the destination host/IP. E.g., `mx1.internal:2525`
### Related issue(s)
Closes#1357
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Alexander A. Klimov <grandmaster@al2klimov.de>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Philip Rosenberg-Watt <p.rosenberg-watt@cablelabs.com>
1359: Refactor the rate limiting code r=mergify[bot] a=kaiyou
## What type of PR?
Enhancement
## What does this PR do?
Rate limiting was already redesigned to use Python limits. This
introduced some unexpected behavior, including the fact that only
one criteria is supported per limiter. Docs and setup utility are
updated with this in mind.
Also, the code was made more generic, so limiters can be delivered
for something else than authentication. Authentication-specific
code was moved directly to the authentication routine.
### Related issue(s)
No specific issue.
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: kaiyou <pierre@jaury.eu>
1349: Add support for SRS, related to #328 r=mergify[bot] a=kaiyou
## What type of PR?
Feature
## What does this PR do?
It implements SRS using a Python SRS library.
### Related issue(s)
- closes#328
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: kaiyou <pierre@jaury.eu>
Rate limiting was already redesigned to use Python limits. This
introduced some unexpected behavior, including the fact that only
one criteria is supported per limiter. Docs and setup utility are
updated with this in mind.
Also, the code was made more generic, so limiters can be delivered
for something else than authentication. Authentication-specific
code was moved directly to the authentication routine.