2058: Implement versioning for CI/CD workflow. r=mergify[bot] a=Diman0
## What type of PR?
Feature!
## What does this PR do?
This PR introduces 3 things
- Add versioning (tagging) for branch x.y (1.8). E.g. 1.8.0, 1.8.1 etc.
- docker repo will contain x.y (latest) and x.y.z (pinned version) images.
- The X.Y.Z tag is incremented automatically. E.g. if 1.8.0 already exists, then the next merge on 1.8 will result in the new tag 1.8.1 being used.
- Make the version available in the image.
- For X.Y and X.Y.Z write the version (X.Y.Z) into /version on the image and add a label with version=X.Y.Z
- This means that the latest X.Y image shows the pinned version (X.Y.Z e.g. 1.8.1) it was based on. Via the tag X.Y.Z you can see the commit hash that triggered the built.
- For master write the commit hash into /version on the image and add a label with version={commit hash}
- Automatic releases. For x.y triggered builts (e.g. merge on 1.9) do a new github release for the pinned x.y.z (e.g. 1.9.2).
- Release shows a static message (see RELEASE_TEMPLATE.md) that explains how to reach the newsfragments folder and change the branch to the tag (x.y.z) mentioned in the release. Now you can get the changelog by reading all newsfragment files in this folder.
This PR does not change anything to our workflow (what we (human persons) do). Our processes are still exactly the same. The above introduced logic is automatic. When we backport to X.Y all the magic for creating the pinned version X.Y.Z is handled by the CI/CD workflow.
### Related issue(s)
- closes#1182
## Prerequisites
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/workflow.html#changelog) entry file.
## Testing
Suggested testing steps. This should cover all situations including BORS. It does require that you use your own docker repo or temporarily create a new one.
Suggested testing steps.
1. Create new github repo.
2. Add the required docker secrets to the project (see beginning of CI.yml for the secret names), DOCKER_UN, DOCKER_PW, DOCKER_ORG, DOCKER_ORG_TESTS.
3. Clone the project.
4. Copy the contents of the PR to the cloned project.
5. Push to your new github repo.
6. Now master images are built. Check that images with tag master are pushed to your docker repo
7. Check with docker inspect nginx:master that it has the label version={commit hash}.
8. Run an image, run `docker-compose exec <name> cat /version`. Note that /version also contains the pinned version. For master the pinned version is the commit hash.
9. Create branch 1.8.
10. Push branch 1.8 to repo.
11. Note that tags 1.8 and 1.8.0 are built and pushed to docker repo
12. Inspect label and /version. Note that 1.8 and 1.8.0 both show version 1.8.0.
13. Push another commit to branch 1.8.
14. Note that tags 1.8 and 1.8.1 are built and pushed to docker repo
15. Inspect label and /version. Note that 1.8 and 1.8.1 both show version 1.8.1.
16. Let's check BORS stuff.
17. Create branch testing.
18. Push the commit with the exact commit text (IMPORTANT!!): `Try #1234:`'.
19. Note that images are built and pushed for tag `pr-1234`.
20. Inspect label and /version. Note that the version is `pr-1234`.
20. Create branch staging.
21. Push the commit with commit text: `Merge #1234`.
22. Note that this image is not pushed to docker (as expected).
but you could also check the GH repo and docker repo I used:
https://github.com/Diman0/Mailu_Forkhttps://hub.docker.com/r/diman/rainloop/tags
Co-authored-by: Dimitri Huisman <diman@huisman.xyz>
- Moved run to bottom of Dockerfile to allow using unmodified / cached states.
- Simplified bash code in deploy.sh.
- Improved the large bash one-liner in CI.yml. It could not handle >9 for 1.x.
2044: Vault/rspamd: don't return any key for relayed domains r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
enhancement
## What does this PR
Don't return any key for relayed domains. We may want to revisit this (ARC signing)... but in the meantime it saves from a scary message in rspamd.
```signing failure: cannot request data from the vault url: /internal/rspamd/vault/v1/dkim/ ...```
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
2042: Add MESSAGE_RATELIMIT_EXEMPTION r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
Enhancement
## What does this PR do?
Add a new knob called ```MESSAGE_RATELIMIT_EXEMPTION```.
### Related issue(s)
- #1774
## Prerequisites
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [ ] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/workflow.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
2034: Add timezone to containers r=mergify[bot] a=DjVinnii
## What type of PR?
Enhancement
## What does this PR do?
This PR adds the tzdata package so that the environment variable `TZ` can be used to set the timezone of containers.
### Related issue(s)
- closes#1154
## Prerequisites
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/workflow.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: DjVinnii <vincentkling@msn.com>
We may want to revisit this (ARC signing)... but in the meantime
it saves from a scary message in rspamd
signing failure: cannot request data from the vault url: /internal/rspamd/vault/v1/dkim/ ...
this is working fine, but introduces a sqlalchemy warning
when using config-import:
/app/mailu/schemas.py:822:
SAWarning: Identity map already had an identity for (...),
replacing it with newly flushed object.
Are there load operations occurring inside of an event handler
within the flush?
ConfigManager should not replace app.config - this is causing trouble
with some other flask modules (swagger).
Updated ConfigManager to only modify app.config and not replace it.
2036: round display of range inputs to 2 decimals r=mergify[bot] a=ghostwheel42
## What type of PR?
small fix
## What does this PR do?
rounds display of range inputs to 2 decimals
### Related issue(s)
- small fix to #1966
## Prerequisites
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [X] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [X] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/workflow.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Graf <ghostwheel42@users.noreply.github.com>
1987: Enhancement to the rate limits r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
enhancement
## What does this PR do?
Turn the rate-limiters into something useful (that won't fire for no reason).
- fix rate-limiting on /webdav/
- it changes the rate-limiting behaviour from limiting a single IP address to a subnet of a reasonable size (/24 on v4 and /56 on v6 both are now configurable) : AUTH_RATELIMIT_IP / AUTH_RATELIMIT_IP_V4_MASK / AUTH_RATELIMIT_IP_V6_MASK
- It ensures we only use IP-based rate-limits for attempts on accounts that do not exist
- it creates a new rate limit preventing attackers from targetting a specific user account (separate from what's above) : AUTH_RATELIMIT_USER
- it introduces a rate limiting exemption mechanism whereby, upon authentication, users will see their source-ip address being exempt for a specific amount of time AUTH_RATELIMIT_EXEMPTION_LENGTH. A similar mechanism is available for web-based sessions (see below)
- It introduces in AUTH_RATELIMIT_EXEMPTION a comma separated list of network CIDRs that will be exempt from both types of rate limiting
- it implements device-tokens, as described on https://owasp.org/www-community/Slow_Down_Online_Guessing_Attacks_with_Device_Cookies to ensure that genuine users aren't locked-out by a malicious attacker abusing the rate-limit feature.
Things that could be improved include:
- the IP-based rate limiter flags attempts against "non-existing" accounts: it could go further and flag the number of unique non-existing accounts attempted (to prevent the case of a user making a typo in his MUA configuration)
- the IP address exemption mechanism doesn't pin the exemption to a specific username: any real user can trivially bypass the rate limits (and attempt to brute-force someone else's account)
### Related issue(s)
- close#1926
- close#1745
- close#1915
## Prerequisites
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/workflow.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
Co-authored-by: Diman0 <diman@huisman.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@users.noreply.github.com>
