2703: Paranoia: drop the headers we don't use r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
enhancement
## What does this PR do?
Paranoia: drop the headers we don't use. This ensures there is no misunderstanding in between front and the other containers.
### Related issue(s)
## Prerequisites
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [ ] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/workflow.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
2613: Enhance network segregation r=nextgens a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
enhancement
## What does this PR do?
- put radicale and webmail on their own network: this is done for security: that way they have no privileged access anywhere (no access to redis, no access to XCLIENT, ...)
- remove the EXPOSE statements from the dockerfiles. These ports are for internal comms and are not meant to be exposed in any way to the outside world.
### Related issue(s)
- #2611
## Prerequisites
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [ ] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [ ] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/workflow.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
2603: Enable HAPROXY protocol on SUBNET r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
bug-fix
## What does this PR do?
- Enable HAPROXY in between front and imap: With this we avoid running into the limitations of ``mail_max_userip_connections`` and the logfiles reflect the real IP.
- Enable HAPROXY in between front and smtp: with this postfix and rspamd are aware of whether TLS was used or not on the last hop. In practice this won't work as nginx doesn't send PROTO yet.
- Discard redundant log messages from postfix
With all of this, not only are the logs easier to understand but ``doveadm who`` also works as one would expect.
### Related issue(s)
- closes#894
- #1328
- closes#1364
- #1705
## Prerequisites
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [ ] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/workflow.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
With this we avoid running into the limitations of
mail_max_userip_connections (see #894 amd #1364) and the
logfiles as well as ``doveadm who`` give an accurate picture.
Anything that can be configured in the web administration interface,
can also be configured via the Mailu RESTful API.
See the section Advanced configuration in the configuration reference
for the relevant settings in mailu.env for enabling the API.
(API, WEB_API, API_TOKEN).
2460: Switch to a base image containing base tools and the podop and socrate libs r=mergify[bot] a=ghostwheel42
## What type of PR?
enhancement of build process
## What does this PR do?
Changes build.hcl to build core images using a base image.
Also adds a "assets" base image for the admin container.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Graf <ghostwheel42@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Jaury <pierre@jaury.eu>
Co-authored-by: kaiyou <pierre@jaury.eu>
Co-authored-by: Dimitri Huisman <52963853+Diman0@users.noreply.github.com>
2468: Ensure that Mailu keeps working even if it can't obtain a certificate from LE r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
bug-fix
## What does this PR do?
Ensure that Mailu keeps working even if it can't obtain a certificate from letsencrypt for one of the HOSTNAMES
Without this TLS configuration would fail and Mailu would operate without TLS completely.
I haven't tested it but thought this used to work previously... maybe certbot has changed something
### Related issue(s)
- closes#2467
## Prerequisites
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/workflow.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
