mirror of
https://github.com/laurent22/joplin.git
synced 2024-12-27 10:32:58 +02:00
186 lines
6.9 KiB
TypeScript
186 lines
6.9 KiB
TypeScript
import Setting from '@joplin/lib/models/Setting';
|
|
import BaseModel from '@joplin/lib/BaseModel';
|
|
|
|
const { synchronizerStart, revisionService, setupDatabaseAndSynchronizer, synchronizer, switchClient, encryptionService, loadEncryptionMasterKey, decryptionWorker } = require('./test-utils.js');
|
|
const Note = require('@joplin/lib/models/Note.js');
|
|
const Revision = require('@joplin/lib/models/Revision.js');
|
|
|
|
describe('Synchronizer.revisions', function() {
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(async (done) => {
|
|
await setupDatabaseAndSynchronizer(1);
|
|
await setupDatabaseAndSynchronizer(2);
|
|
await switchClient(1);
|
|
done();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should not save revisions when updating a note via sync', (async () => {
|
|
// When a note is updated, a revision of the original is created.
|
|
// Here, on client 1, the note is updated for the first time, however since it is
|
|
// via sync, we don't create a revision - that revision has already been created on client
|
|
// 2 and is going to be synced.
|
|
|
|
const n1 = await Note.save({ title: 'testing' });
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
|
|
await switchClient(2);
|
|
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
await Note.save({ id: n1.id, title: 'mod from client 2' });
|
|
await revisionService().collectRevisions();
|
|
const allRevs1 = await Revision.allByType(BaseModel.TYPE_NOTE, n1.id);
|
|
expect(allRevs1.length).toBe(1);
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
|
|
await switchClient(1);
|
|
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
const allRevs2 = await Revision.allByType(BaseModel.TYPE_NOTE, n1.id);
|
|
expect(allRevs2.length).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(allRevs2[0].id).toBe(allRevs1[0].id);
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
it('should not save revisions when deleting a note via sync', (async () => {
|
|
const n1 = await Note.save({ title: 'testing' });
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
|
|
await switchClient(2);
|
|
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
await Note.delete(n1.id);
|
|
await revisionService().collectRevisions(); // REV 1
|
|
{
|
|
const allRevs = await Revision.allByType(BaseModel.TYPE_NOTE, n1.id);
|
|
expect(allRevs.length).toBe(1);
|
|
}
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
|
|
await switchClient(1);
|
|
|
|
await synchronizerStart(); // The local note gets deleted here, however a new rev is *not* created
|
|
{
|
|
const allRevs = await Revision.allByType(BaseModel.TYPE_NOTE, n1.id);
|
|
expect(allRevs.length).toBe(1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const notes = await Note.all();
|
|
expect(notes.length).toBe(0);
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
it('should not save revisions when an item_change has been generated as a result of a sync', (async () => {
|
|
// When a note is modified an item_change object is going to be created. This
|
|
// is used for example to tell the search engine, when note should be indexed. It is
|
|
// also used by the revision service to tell what note should get a new revision.
|
|
// When a note is modified via sync, this item_change object is also created. The issue
|
|
// is that we don't want to create revisions for these particular item_changes, because
|
|
// such revision has already been created on another client (whatever client initially
|
|
// modified the note), and that rev is going to be synced.
|
|
//
|
|
// So in the end we need to make sure that we don't create these unecessary additional revisions.
|
|
|
|
const n1 = await Note.save({ title: 'testing' });
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
|
|
await switchClient(2);
|
|
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
await Note.save({ id: n1.id, title: 'mod from client 2' });
|
|
await revisionService().collectRevisions();
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
|
|
await switchClient(1);
|
|
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
const allRevs = await Revision.allByType(BaseModel.TYPE_NOTE, n1.id);
|
|
expect(allRevs.length).toBe(1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
await revisionService().collectRevisions();
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
const allRevs = await Revision.allByType(BaseModel.TYPE_NOTE, n1.id);
|
|
expect(allRevs.length).toBe(1);
|
|
}
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
it('should handle case when new rev is created on client, then older rev arrives later via sync', (async () => {
|
|
// - C1 creates note 1
|
|
// - C1 modifies note 1 - REV1 created
|
|
// - C1 sync
|
|
// - C2 sync
|
|
// - C2 receives note 1
|
|
// - C2 modifies note 1 - REV2 created (but not based on REV1)
|
|
// - C2 receives REV1
|
|
//
|
|
// In that case, we need to make sure that REV1 and REV2 are both valid and can be retrieved.
|
|
// Even though REV1 was created before REV2, REV2 is *not* based on REV1. This is not ideal
|
|
// due to unecessary data being saved, but a possible edge case and we simply need to check
|
|
// all the data is valid.
|
|
|
|
// Note: this test seems to be a bit shaky because it doesn't work if the synchronizer
|
|
// context is passed around (via synchronizerStart()), but it should.
|
|
|
|
const n1 = await Note.save({ title: 'note' });
|
|
await Note.save({ id: n1.id, title: 'note REV1' });
|
|
await revisionService().collectRevisions(); // REV1
|
|
expect((await Revision.allByType(BaseModel.TYPE_NOTE, n1.id)).length).toBe(1);
|
|
await synchronizer().start();
|
|
|
|
await switchClient(2);
|
|
|
|
synchronizer().testingHooks_ = ['skipRevisions'];
|
|
await synchronizer().start();
|
|
synchronizer().testingHooks_ = [];
|
|
|
|
await Note.save({ id: n1.id, title: 'note REV2' });
|
|
await revisionService().collectRevisions(); // REV2
|
|
expect((await Revision.allByType(BaseModel.TYPE_NOTE, n1.id)).length).toBe(1);
|
|
await synchronizer().start(); // Sync the rev that had been skipped above with skipRevisions
|
|
|
|
const revisions = await Revision.allByType(BaseModel.TYPE_NOTE, n1.id);
|
|
expect(revisions.length).toBe(2);
|
|
|
|
expect((await revisionService().revisionNote(revisions, 0)).title).toBe('note REV1');
|
|
expect((await revisionService().revisionNote(revisions, 1)).title).toBe('note REV2');
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
it('should not create revisions when item is modified as a result of decryption', (async () => {
|
|
// Handle this scenario:
|
|
// - C1 creates note
|
|
// - C1 never changes it
|
|
// - E2EE is enabled
|
|
// - C1 sync
|
|
// - More than one week later (as defined by oldNoteCutOffDate_), C2 sync
|
|
// - C2 enters master password and note gets decrypted
|
|
//
|
|
// Technically at this point the note is modified (from encrypted to non-encrypted) and thus a ItemChange
|
|
// object is created. The note is also older than oldNoteCutOffDate. However, this should not lead to the
|
|
// creation of a revision because that change was not the result of a user action.
|
|
// I guess that's the general rule - changes that come from user actions should result in revisions,
|
|
// while automated changes (sync, decryption) should not.
|
|
|
|
const dateInPast = revisionService().oldNoteCutOffDate_() - 1000;
|
|
|
|
await Note.save({ title: 'ma note', updated_time: dateInPast, created_time: dateInPast }, { autoTimestamp: false });
|
|
const masterKey = await loadEncryptionMasterKey();
|
|
await encryptionService().enableEncryption(masterKey, '123456');
|
|
await encryptionService().loadMasterKeysFromSettings();
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
|
|
await switchClient(2);
|
|
|
|
await synchronizerStart();
|
|
|
|
Setting.setObjectValue('encryption.passwordCache', masterKey.id, '123456');
|
|
await encryptionService().loadMasterKeysFromSettings();
|
|
await decryptionWorker().start();
|
|
|
|
await revisionService().collectRevisions();
|
|
|
|
expect((await Revision.all()).length).toBe(0);
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
});
|