mirror of
https://github.com/laurent22/joplin.git
synced 2024-12-03 08:35:29 +02:00
59 lines
2.4 KiB
TypeScript
59 lines
2.4 KiB
TypeScript
import ShareService from './ShareService';
|
|
import Logger from '@joplin/utils/Logger';
|
|
import Folder from '../../models/Folder';
|
|
import { reg } from '../../registry';
|
|
import { _ } from '../../locale';
|
|
import { MasterKeyEntity } from '../e2ee/types';
|
|
|
|
const logger = Logger.create('invitationRespond');
|
|
|
|
export default async function(shareUserId: string, folderId: string, masterKey: MasterKeyEntity, accept: boolean) {
|
|
// The below functions can take a bit of time to complete so in the
|
|
// meantime we hide the notification so that the user doesn't click
|
|
// multiple times on the Accept link.
|
|
ShareService.instance().setProcessingShareInvitationResponse(true);
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
await ShareService.instance().respondInvitation(shareUserId, masterKey, accept);
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
logger.error(error);
|
|
alert(_('Could not respond to the invitation. Please try again, or check with the notebook owner if they are still sharing it.\n\nThe error was: "%s"', error.message));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This is to handle an edge case that can happen if:
|
|
//
|
|
// - The user is a recipient of a share.
|
|
// - The sender removes the recipient from the share, then add him again.
|
|
// - The recipient gets the invitation, but reply "Reject" to it.
|
|
//
|
|
// If we don't handle this case, it would kind of work but would create
|
|
// conflicts because the shared notes would be converted to local ones, then
|
|
// during sync the synchronizer would try to delete them. Since they've been
|
|
// changed, they'll all be marked as conflicts.
|
|
//
|
|
// So the simplest thing to do is to leave the folder, which is most likely
|
|
// what the user wants. And if not, it's always possible to ask the sender
|
|
// to share again.
|
|
//
|
|
// NOTE: DOESN'T WORK. Because Folder.updateAllShareIds() would still run
|
|
// and change the notes share_id property, thus creating conflicts again.
|
|
// Leaving it as it is for now, as it's an unlikely scenario and it won't
|
|
// cause any data loss.
|
|
|
|
if (!accept) {
|
|
const existingFolder = await Folder.load(folderId);
|
|
if (existingFolder) {
|
|
logger.warn('Rejected an invitation, but the folder was already there. Conflicts are likely to happen. ShareUserId:', shareUserId, 'Folder ID:', folderId);
|
|
// await ShareService.instance().leaveSharedFolder(folderId);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
await ShareService.instance().refreshShareInvitations();
|
|
} finally {
|
|
ShareService.instance().setProcessingShareInvitationResponse(false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void reg.scheduleSync(1000);
|
|
}
|