closes#3515
I think after this is fixed, we should publish a new release as this can
be quite important.
Co-authored-by: Robert Kaussow <mail@thegeeklab.de>
Closes https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/discussions/2274
# deprecation of alternative names
Instead of
```yaml
secrets:
- source: some_secret
target: some_env
```
you now write:
```yaml
environment:
some_env:
from_secret: some_secret
```
Also, it's possible to use complex yaml objects in `environment`,
they're turned into json (just like `settings`).
Currently, backend options are parsed in the yaml parser.
This has some issues:
- backend specific code should be in the backend folders
- it is not possible to add backend options for backends added via
addons
closes#1801closes#1815closes#1144
closes #983
closes #557closes#1827
regression of #1791
# TODO
- [x] adjust log model
- [x] add migration for logs
- [x] send log line via grpc using step-id
- [x] save log-line to db
- [x] stream log-lines to UI
- [x] use less structs for log-data
- [x] make web UI work
- [x] display logs loaded from db
- [x] display streaming logs
- [ ] ~~make migration work~~ -> dedicated pull (#1828)
# TESTED
- [x] new logs are stored in database
- [x] log retrieval via cli (of new logs) works
- [x] log streaming works (tested via curl & webui)
- [x] log retrieval via web (of new logs) works
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
This add a simple implementation of requests/limits for individual
steps. There is no validation of what the resource actually is beyond
checking that it can successfully be converted to a Quantity, so it can
be used for things other than just memory/CPU.
close#1809
Since "success" and "failure" are the only two possible values, and
"success" is considered to be included by default, the existing code can
also be simplified a little.
This has the side effect of ignoring the "exclude" part of the
constraint completely. I put it in the tests just to make sure the
workaround in
https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1181#issuecomment-1347253585
continues to work as expected, but couldn't think of any legitimate use
cases for it.
Fixes#1181
closes#1181closes#834
Adds `ignore_failure` to pipeline steps. When it's set to true,
if the step fails the following steps continue to execute as if no failure had occurred.
---
failure enums idea:
* fail (default) = if other steps run in parallel, wait for them and
then let workflow fail
* cancel = if other steps run in parallel, kill them
* ignore = we mark the step as failed but it wont have any impact
at the moment we compile a script that we can pipe in as single command
this is because of the constrains the docker backend gives us.
so we move it into the docker backend and eventually get rid of it altogether
- Support for pipeline/containers as list
- Support for container name in logs (step.Name)
Co-authored-by: Zav Shotan <zshotan@bloomberg.net>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Officially support labels for pipelines and agents to improve pipeline picking.
* add pipeline labels
* update, improve docs and add migration
* update proto file
---
closes#304 & #860
