You've already forked FFmpeg
mirror of
https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg.git
synced 2025-08-04 22:03:09 +02:00
avfilter/f_ebur128: move true peak calculation out of main loop
Easier to read, less convoluted, and ~30% faster. Most importantly, this avoids repeating the redundant recalculation of the true peak on every single sample, by moving the FIND_PEAK() loop out of the main loop. (Note that FIND_PEAK() does not depend on the current sample index at all, so there is no reason for it to ever be recomputed here)
This commit is contained in:
@ -668,16 +668,22 @@ static int filter_frame(AVFilterLink *inlink, AVFrame *insamples)
|
||||
(const uint8_t **)insamples->data, nb_samples);
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
for (ch = 0; ch < nb_channels; ch++)
|
||||
ebur128->true_peaks_per_frame[ch] = 0.0;
|
||||
for (idx_insample = 0; idx_insample < ret; idx_insample++) {
|
||||
for (ch = 0; ch < nb_channels; ch++) {
|
||||
ebur128->true_peaks[ch] = FFMAX(ebur128->true_peaks[ch], fabs(*swr_samples));
|
||||
ebur128->true_peaks_per_frame[ch] = FFMAX(ebur128->true_peaks_per_frame[ch],
|
||||
fabs(*swr_samples));
|
||||
swr_samples++;
|
||||
|
||||
double maxpeak = 0.0;
|
||||
for (int ch = 0; ch < nb_channels; ch++) {
|
||||
double tp = ebur128->true_peaks[ch];
|
||||
double tppf = 0.0;
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
|
||||
const double sample = fabs(swr_samples[i * nb_channels]);
|
||||
tp = FFMAX(tp, sample);
|
||||
tppf = FFMAX(tppf, sample);
|
||||
}
|
||||
maxpeak = FFMAX(maxpeak, tp);
|
||||
ebur128->true_peaks[ch] = tp;
|
||||
ebur128->true_peaks_per_frame[ch] = tppf;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ebur128->true_peak = DBFS(maxpeak);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
@ -720,7 +726,6 @@ static int filter_frame(AVFilterLink *inlink, AVFrame *insamples)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
FIND_PEAK(ebur128->sample_peak, ebur128->sample_peaks, SAMPLES);
|
||||
FIND_PEAK(ebur128->true_peak, ebur128->true_peaks, TRUE);
|
||||
|
||||
/* For integrated loudness, gating blocks are 400ms long with 75%
|
||||
* overlap (see BS.1770-2 p5), so a re-computation is needed each 100ms
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user