mirror of
https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg.git
synced 2024-12-23 12:43:46 +02:00
The definition of rate and distortion is not conditional of lambda being
fixed (at least the current text sounded odd to me). Originally committed as revision 18244 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
This commit is contained in:
parent
767e14c380
commit
52760ed76e
@ -21,8 +21,10 @@ Let's consider the problem of minimizing:
|
||||
|
||||
distortion + lambda*rate
|
||||
|
||||
For a fixed lambda, rate would represent the filesize, while distortion is
|
||||
the quality. Is this equivalent to finding the best quality for a given max
|
||||
rate is the filesize
|
||||
distortion is the quality
|
||||
lambda is a fixed value choosen as a tradeoff between quality and filesize
|
||||
Is this equivalent to finding the best quality for a given max
|
||||
filesize? The answer is yes. For each filesize limit there is some lambda
|
||||
factor for which minimizing above will get you the best quality (using your
|
||||
chosen quality measurement) at the desired (or lower) filesize.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user