virtualenv/FFmpeg
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg.git synced 2024-12-23 12:43:46 +02:00
Code Issues Releases Activity

Consistency: make the output buffer the first argument of functions

Browse Source 
Originally committed as revision 13934 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
This commit is contained in:
Vitor Sessak 2008-06-23 21:00:28 +00:00
parent 0a03b6f049
commit 80e9f30c23
1 changed files with 12 additions and 12 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

24
libavcodec/ra144.c
View File

@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static int t_sqrt(unsigned int x)
* Evaluate the LPC filter coefficients from the reflection coefficients.
* Does the inverse of the eval_refl() function.
*/
static void eval_coefs(const int *refl, int *coefs)
static void eval_coefs(int *coefs, const int *refl)
{
int buffer[10];
int *b1 = buffer;
@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static void eval_coefs(const int *refl, int *coefs)
* Copy the last offset values of *source to *target. If those values are not
* enough to fill the target buffer, fill it with another copy of those values.
*/
static void copy_and_dup(const int16_t *source, int16_t *target, int offset)
static void copy_and_dup(int16_t *target, const int16_t *source, int offset)
{
source += BUFFERSIZE - offset;
@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ static int irms(const int16_t *data)
return 0x20000000 / (t_sqrt(sum) >> 8);
}
static void add_wav(int n, int skip_first, int *m, const int16_t *s1,
const int8_t *s2, const int8_t *s3, int16_t *dest)
static void add_wav(int16_t *dest, int n, int skip_first, int *m,
const int16_t *s1, const int8_t *s2, const int8_t *s3)
{
int i;
int v[3];
@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void add_wav(int n, int skip_first, int *m, const int16_t *s1,
* @param in the input of the filter. It should be an array of size len + 10.
* The 10 first input values are used to evaluate the first filtered one.
*/
static void lpc_filter(const int16_t *lpc_coefs, uint16_t *in, int len)
static void lpc_filter(uint16_t *in, const int16_t *lpc_coefs, int len)
{
int x, i;
int16_t *ptr = in;
@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void do_output_subblock(RA144Context *ractx,
if (cba_idx) {
cba_idx += BLOCKSIZE/2 - 1;
copy_and_dup(ractx->adapt_cb, buffer_a, cba_idx);
copy_and_dup(buffer_a, ractx->adapt_cb, cba_idx);
m[0] = (irms(buffer_a) * gval) >> 12;
} else {
m[0] = 0;
@ -228,15 +228,15 @@ static void do_output_subblock(RA144Context *ractx,
block = ractx->adapt_cb + BUFFERSIZE - BLOCKSIZE;
add_wav(gain, cba_idx, m, buffer_a, cb1_vects[cb1_idx], cb2_vects[cb2_idx],
block);
add_wav(block, gain, cba_idx, m, buffer_a,
cb1_vects[cb1_idx], cb2_vects[cb2_idx]);
memcpy(ractx->curr_sblock, ractx->curr_sblock + 40,
10*sizeof(*ractx->curr_sblock));
memcpy(ractx->curr_sblock + 10, block,
BLOCKSIZE*sizeof(*ractx->curr_sblock));
lpc_filter(lpc_coefs, ractx->curr_sblock, BLOCKSIZE);
lpc_filter(ractx->curr_sblock, lpc_coefs, BLOCKSIZE);
}
static void int_to_int16(int16_t *out, const int *inp)
@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static void int_to_int16(int16_t *out, const int *inp)
* @return 1 if one of the reflection coefficients is of magnitude greater than
* 4095, 0 if not.
*/
static int eval_refl(const int16_t *coefs, int *refl, RA144Context *ractx)
static int eval_refl(int *refl, const int16_t *coefs, RA144Context *ractx)
{
int retval = 0;
int b, c, i;
@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int interp(RA144Context *ractx, int16_t *out, int block_num,
for (x=0; x<30; x++)
out[x] = (a * ractx->lpc_coef[x] + b * ractx->lpc_coef_old[x])>> 2;
if (eval_refl(out, work, ractx)) {
if (eval_refl(work, out, ractx)) {
// The interpolated coefficients are unstable, copy either new or old
// coefficients
if (copynew) {
@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static int ra144_decode_frame(AVCodecContext * avctx,
// "<< 1"? Doesn't this make one value out of two of the table useless?
lpc_refl[i] = lpc_refl_cb[i][get_bits(&gb, sizes[i]) << 1];
eval_coefs(lpc_refl, ractx->lpc_coef);
eval_coefs(ractx->lpc_coef, lpc_refl);
ractx->lpc_refl_rms = rms(lpc_refl);
energy = energy_tab[get_bits(&gb, 5) << 1]; // Useless table entries?