From bc1557328359a09461ea36577c60f60fecda511b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:14:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] link fix by Dujardin Bernard, dujardin.iut numericable fr

Originally committed as revision 8028 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
---
 doc/faq.texi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/faq.texi b/doc/faq.texi
index 70620bb24c..8c9d9ab7d8 100644
--- a/doc/faq.texi
+++ b/doc/faq.texi
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ No. These tools are too bloated and they complicate the build.
 ffmpeg is already organized in a highly modular manner and does not need to
 be rewritten in a formal object language. Further, many of the developers
 favor straight C; it works for them. For more arguments on this matter,
-read "Programming Religion" at (@url{http://lkml.org/faq/lkmlfaq-15.html}).
+read "Programming Religion" at (@url{http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s15}).
 
 @section Why are the ffmpeg programs devoid of debugging symbols ?