Fixes filter-pixfmts-scale test failing on big-endian systems due to
alpSrc not being cast to (const int32_t**).
Also fixes distortions in the output alpha channel values by copying the
alpha channel code from the rgba64 case found elsewhere in output.c.
Fixes ticket 6555.
Signed-off-by: James Cowgill <James.Cowgill@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
This commit switches off forced correct nesting of tags and only keeps
it for font tags. See long explanations in the code for the rationale.
This results in various FATE changes which I'll explain here:
- various swapping in font attributes, this is mostly noise due to the
old reverse stack way of printing them. The new one is more correct as
the last attribute takes over the previous ones.
- unrecognized tags disappears
- invalid tags that were previously displayed aren't anymore (instead,
we have a warning). This is better for the end user
The main benefit of this commit is to be more tolerant to error, leading
to a better handling of badly nested tags or random wrong formatting for
the end user.
This reverts commit 04aa09c4bc
and reintroduces 0ff5567a30 that
was temporarily reverted due to minor regressions.
It also reverts e5bce8b4ce that fixed FATE refs.
The fate-ffm change is caused by field_order now being set
on the output format because the first frame arrives earlier.
The fate-mxf change is assumed to be the same.
The scale2ref filter will now maintain the DAR of the main input and
not the DAR of the reference input. This previous behavior was deemed
counterintuitive for most (all?) use-cases.
Before:
scale2ref=iw/4:ow/mdar
in w:320 h:240 fmt:rgb24 sar:1/1
ref w:640 h:360 fmt:rgb24 sar:1/1
out w:160 h:120 fmt:rgb24 sar:4/3 flags:0x2
SAR: ((120 * 640) / (160 * 360)) * (1 / 1) = 4 / 3
DAR: (160 / 120) * (4 / 3) = 16 / 9
(main out now same DAR as ref)
Now:
scale2ref=iw/4:ow/mdar
in w:320 h:240 fmt:rgb24 sar:1/1
ref w:640 h:360 fmt:rgb24 sar:1/1
out w:160 h:120 fmt:rgb24 sar:1/1 flags:0x2
SAR: ((120 * 320) / (160 * 240)) * (1 / 1) = 1 / 1
DAR: (160 / 120) * (1 / 1) = 4 / 3
(main out same DAR as main in)
The scale2ref FATE test has also been updated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Mark <kmark937@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
This is actually internal utvideo format.
Allows to make use of SIMD for median prediction for rgb(a) formats,
thus speeding up decoding.
Simplifies code, eases further developement and maintenance.
Update FATE because of pixel format switch.
Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>
<@jamrial> durandal_1707: 04aa09c4bc broke fate-lavf-ffm and fate-lavf-mxf
<@durandal_1707> how so?
<@jamrial> one byte changes
<@durandal_1707> jamrial: just update checksums
<@jamrial> durandal_1707: but why did they change at all? the commit you reverted didn't affect them
<@jamrial> why does reverting it affect these tests?
<@jamrial> i don't think updating the checksum without knowing what changed is a good idea
<@durandal_1707> jamrial: the lavfi core is in weird state after removal of recursive code
<@durandal_1707> jamrial: the change is that older ones would get progressive flag set and new one doesnt
<@jamrial> alright
The md5 protocol has no seek support, but some tests use seeks. This changes
the fate tests to actually create the output files and calculate the md5 on the
written files, which also makes the tests independent of the size of the output
buffers and output buffering in general.
A new md5pipe fate test method is also introduced to keep the old functionality
for tests where using a non-seekable output was intentional, and matroska md5
tests are changed to use that.
Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu>
Meant for DSP functions returning a float or double, as they'd fail if emms
is called after every run on x86_32.
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
If the videos starts with B frame, then the minimum composition time
as computed by stts + ctts will be non-zero. Hence we need to shift
the DTS, so that the first pts is zero. This was the intention of that
code-block. However it was subtracting by the wrong amount.
For example, for one of the videos in the bug nonFormatted.mp4 we have
stts:
sample_count duration
960 1001
ctts:
sample_count duration
1 3003
2 0
1 3003
....
The resulting composition times are : 3003, 1001, 2002, 6006, ...
The minimum composition time or PTS is 1001, which should be used to
offset DTS. However the code block was wrongly using ctts[0] which is
3003. Hence the PTS was negative. This change computes the minimum pts
encountered while fixing the index, and then subtracts it from all the
timestamps after the edit list fixes are applied.
Samples files available from:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=721451https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=723537
fate-suite/h264/twofields_packet.mp4 is a similar file starting with 2
B frames. Before this change the PTS of first two B-frames was -6006
and -3003, and I am guessing one of them got dropped when being decoded
and remuxed to the framecrc before, and now it is not being dropped.
Signed-off-by: Sasi Inguva <isasi@google.com>
This test the demuxer discarding non ADTS frames at the beginning and
end of the input.
As a side effect, this commit also enables fate-adts-demux, which was
accidentally disabled in 324f0fbff1.
Tested-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
This new FATE test for the scale2ref filter makes use of the recently
added scale2ref-specific variables to maintain the aspect ratio of a
test input.
Filtergraph explanation:
[main] has an AR of 4:3. [ref] has an AR of 16:9.
640 / 4 = 160. So the new width for [main] is 160.
160 / ((320 / 240) * (1 / 1)) = 160 / (4 / 3) = 120. So the new
height for [main] is 120.
160 / 120 = 4 / 3 so [main]'s aspect ratio has been maintained while
using [ref]'s width as a reference point.
[ref] is nullsink'd since it is left unchanged by scale2ref (and so
shouldn't need to be tested).
If we were to use "iw/4:-1" in place of "iw/4:ow/mdar":
640 / 4 = 160. So the new width for [main] would be 160.
360 / 4 = 90. So the new height for [main] would be 90.
160 / 90 = 16 / 9 so [main] now has the same aspect ratio as [ref]
which is probably what you do not want.
This is currently the only test for scale2ref.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Mark <kmark937@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
