gmtime isn't thread safe in general. In msvcrt (which lacks gmtime_r),
the buffer used by gmtime is thread specific though.
One call to localtime is left in avconv_opt.c, where thread safety
shouldn't matter (instead of making avconv depend on the libavutil
internal header).
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
This allows writing most code as if they always are is available.
These are ok to use from other libraries even though it's not a
public header, since they only provide an inline declaration, and
doesn't add an actual dependency on lavu internals. (This can be
considered more a build system compatibility fallback than a
libavutil feature.)
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Since av_gettime() is used in a number of places where actual
real time clock is required, the monotonic clock introduced in
ebef9f5a5 would have consequences that are hard to handle. Instead
split it into a separate function that can be used in the cases
where only relative time is desired.
On platform where no monotonic clock is available, the difference
between the two av_gettime functions is not clear, and one could
mistakenly use the relative clock where an absolute one is
required. Therefore add an offset, to make it evident that the
time returned from av_gettime_relative never is actual current
real time, even though it is based on av_gettime.
Based on a patch by Olivier Langlois.
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
In order to support metadata being set as an option, it's necessary to be able
to set dictionaries as values.
Signed-off-by: Anton Khirnov <anton@khirnov.net>
The rationale is that you have a packed format in form
<greyscale sample> <alpha sample> <greyscale sample> <alpha sample>
and shortening greyscale to 'G' might make one thing about Greenscale instead.
An alias pixel format and color space name are provided for compatibility.
libavutil/cpu-test prints raw and effective cpu flags to STDERR. Detected
cpu flags can be useful for debugging fate errors.
No comparison of the result against a expected result since that would
require fate config specific references.
I benchmarked the result by measuring the number of gperftools samples that
hit anywhere in the AAC decoder (starting from aac_decode_frame()) or
specifically in butterflies_float_c() / ff_butterflies_float_vfp() for the
same sample AAC stream:
Before After
Mean StdDev Mean StdDev Confidence Change
Audio decode 1542.8 43.7 1470.5 41.5 100.0% +4.9%
butterflies_float 130.0 11.9 70.2 12.1 100.0% +85.2%
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
I benchmarked the result by measuring the number of gperftools samples that
hit anywhere in the AAC decoder (starting from aac_decode_frame()) or
specifically in vector_fmul_window_c() / ff_vector_fmul_window_vfp() for the
same sample AAC stream:
Before After
Mean StdDev Mean StdDev Confidence Change
Audio decode 1598.2 47.4 1529.2 25.4 100.0% +4.5%
vector_fmul_window 244.0 22.1 188.9 22.3 100.0% +29.2%
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Categorize the enum and functions as "audio-related".
Signed-off-by: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>
When running on a 64 bit kernel, /proc/cpuinfo lists different
optional features than on 32 bit kernels (because some of them
are mandatory in the 64 bit implemenations).
The kernel does list the old features properly if they are queried
via /proc/self/auxv though - however this file is not always readable
(e.g. on most android systems). The getauxval function could also
provide the same info as /proc/self/auxv even if this file isn't
readable, but this function is not always available (and thus would
need to be loaded with dlsym for compatibility with older android
versions).
The android cpufeatures library does this slightly differently,
by assuming that these are available if the "CPU architecture"
line is >= 8, see [1] for details.
It has been suggested to include the old, non-optional features in
/proc/cpuinfo as well, but that suggested patch never was merged.
See [2] for the discussion around this suggestion.
[1] https://android-review.googlesource.com/91380
[2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=139087240101974
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
