Up until now, an AVFilter's lists of input and output AVFilterPads
were terminated by a sentinel and the only way to get the length
of these lists was by using avfilter_pad_count(). This has two
drawbacks: first, sizeof(AVFilterPad) is not negligible
(i.e. 64B on 64bit systems); second, getting the size involves
a function call instead of just reading the data.
This commit therefore changes this. The sentinels are removed and new
private fields nb_inputs and nb_outputs are added to AVFilter that
contain the number of elements of the respective AVFilterPad array.
Given that AVFilter.(in|out)puts are the only arrays of zero-terminated
AVFilterPads an API user has access to (AVFilterContext.(in|out)put_pads
are not zero-terminated and they already have a size field) the argument
to avfilter_pad_count() is always one of these lists, so it just has to
find the filter the list belongs to and read said number. This is slower
than before, but a replacement function that just reads the internal numbers
that users are expected to switch to will be added soon; and furthermore,
avfilter_pad_count() is probably never called in hot loops anyway.
This saves about 49KiB from the binary; notice that these sentinels are
not in .bss despite being zeroed: they are in .data.rel.ro due to the
non-sentinels.
Reviewed-by: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
The current way of doing it involves writing the ctx parameter twice.
Reviewed-by: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
Several combinations of functions happen quite often in query_format
functions; e.g. ff_set_common_formats(ctx, ff_make_format_list(sample_fmts))
is very common. This commit therefore adds functions that are equivalent
to commonly used function combinations in order to reduce code
duplication.
Reviewed-by: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
This is possible now that the next-API is gone.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Since c737f6edce prescreening is
nevertheless run because of a wrong check: "if (s->prescreen > 0)".
s->prescreen is an array of two function pointers that is contained in
the context and comparing it with 0 (i.e. NULL) is actually undefined
behaviour, because NULL and s->prescreen do not point to the same
object (NULL after all never points to any object). Nevertheless both
Clang as well as GCC compile this to code that treat s->prescreen > 0 as
true, leading to segfaults, because the code then tries to access the
-1th member of an array.
This commit fixes the check as well as another such check a few lines
below.
(Found via compiler warnings enabled by -pedantic:
"ordered comparison between pointer and zero is an extension".)
Reviewed-by: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@gmail.com>
