This commit does some refactoring to make defining assembly codelets
smaller, and fixes compiler redefinition warnings. It also allows
for other assembly versions to reuse the same boilerplate code as
x86.
Finally, it also adds the out_of_place flag to all assembly codelets.
This changes nothing, as out-of-place operation was assumed to be
available anyway, but this makes it more explicit.
Users should switch to the superior AVFifo API.
Unfortunately AVFifoBuffer fields cannot be marked as deprecated because
it would trigger a warning wherever fifo.h is #included, due to
inlined av_fifo_peek2().
Many AVFifoBuffer users operate on fixed-size elements (e.g. pointers),
but the current FIFO API deals exclusively in bytes, requiring extra
complexity in all these callers.
Add a new AVFifo API creating a FIFO with an element size
that may be larger than a byte. All operations on such a FIFO then
operate on complete elements.
This API does not reuse AVFifoBuffer and its API at all, but instead uses
an opaque struct called AVFifo. The AVFifoBuffer API will be deprecated
in a future commit once all of its users have been switched to the new
API.
Not reusing AVFifoBuffer also allowed to use the full range of size_t
from the beginning.
The API currently allows creating FIFOs up to
- UINT_MAX: av_fifo_alloc(), av_fifo_realloc(), av_fifo_grow()
- SIZE_MAX: av_fifo_alloc_array()
However the usable limit is determined by
- rndx/wndx being uint32_t
- av_fifo_[size,space] returning int
so no FIFO should be larger than the smallest of
- INT_MAX
- UINT32_MAX
- SIZE_MAX
(which should be INT_MAX an all commonly used platforms).
Return an error on trying to allocate FIFOs larger than this limit.
Avoids code duplication. It furthermore properly checks
for buf_size to be > 0 before doing anything.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
This reduces sibilance distortion when sibilance and bass are
present at the same time. Bringing the protection of high
frequencies up to about the same level as for low frequencies
should also make the quality less dependent on the frequency
balance of the playback system.
Signed-off-by: Jason Jang <jcj83429@gmail.com>
Ignore more samples that are near the edge of the block. The reason
is that the filtering tends to cause these samples to go above the
window more than the samples near the middle. If these samples are
included in the unwindowed peak estimation, the peak can be
overestimated. Because the block is windowed again before
overlapping, overshoots near the edge of the block are not very
important.
0.1 is the value from the version originally contributed to calf.
Signed-off-by: Jason Jang <jcj83429@gmail.com>
With a complex FFT instead of real FFT, the negative frequencies
are not dropped from the spectrum output, so they need to be scaled
when the positive frequencies are scaled. The location of the top
bin is also different.
Signed-off-by: Jason Jang <jcj83429@gmail.com>