Up until now, we had a PacketList structure which is actually
a PacketListEntry; a proper PacketList did not exist
and all the related functions just passed pointers to pointers
to the head and tail elements around. All these pointers were
actually consecutive elements of their containing structs,
i.e. the users already treated them as if they were a struct.
So add a proper PacketList struct and rename the current PacketList
to PacketListEntry; also make the functions use this structure
instead of the pair of pointers.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
The packet given to muxers is not used afterwards; it is always
unreferenced by libavformat. Ergo muxers are allowed to keep
the references in the packets and e.g. move the ownership to
a packet list. This is what this commit does.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
This is possible now that the next-API is gone.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
The next pointer is kept at the end for backwards compatability until the
major bump, when it should ideally be moved at the front.
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
And replace the flags parameter with a function callback that can be used to
copy the contents of the packet (e.g, av_packet_ref and av_packet_copy_props).
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
The TTA muxer writes a seektable in a dynamic buffer as it receives
packets and when writing the trailer, closes the dynamic buffer using
avio_close_dyn_buf(), writes the seektable and frees the buffer. But
the TTA muxer already has a deinit function which unconditionally
calls ffio_free_dyn_buf() on the dynamic buffer, so switching to
avio_get_dyn_buf() means that one can remove the code to free the
buffer; furthermore, it also might save an allocation if the seektable
is so small that it fits into the dynamic buffer's write buffer or if
adding the padding that avio_close_dyn_buf() adds necessitated
reallocating of the underlying buffer.
Reviewed-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@gmail.com>
