* commit 'f8df5e2f31a5ba7b30a0e1caaaf5a03c753b3f9b':
tests: Add a convenience function for video-only lavf tests
Merged-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
* commit 'a70eac7a9b193e8434b5bed90bd72aa4cb688363':
tests: Convert image2pipe tests to non-legacy test scripts
Merged-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
ISMV lacks any sort of edit list support, as well as tfxd is
effectively the PTS of the fragment for most intents and purposes.
Thus, if b-frames are requested without negative CTS offsets you
end up with N frames' worth of delay (tfxd PTS plus the CTS offset
of the first sample). Negative CTS offsets enable the first sample
to have CTS=DTS, and thus a/v desync due to b-frame reorder delay
is avoided.
According to EBU tech 3285 supplement 3 the dwPosPeakOfPeaks field
should contain the absolute position to the maximum audio sample value,
but the current implementation writes the relative peak frame index
instead.
Fix the issue by writing the "unknown" value (-1) for now until the
feature is implemented correctly.
Previous version reviewed-by: Peter Bubestinger <p.bubestinger@av-rd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Signed-off-by: Tobias Rapp <t.rapp@noa-archive.com>
Since there is no information about the source format, "unspecified"
is the correct value to write here.
All tests using the MPEG-2 encoder are updated, as this changes the
header on all outputs.
This reverts commit 04aa09c4bc
and reintroduces 0ff5567a30 that
was temporarily reverted due to minor regressions.
It also reverts e5bce8b4ce that fixed FATE refs.
The fate-ffm change is caused by field_order now being set
on the output format because the first frame arrives earlier.
The fate-mxf change is assumed to be the same.
<@jamrial> durandal_1707: 04aa09c4bc broke fate-lavf-ffm and fate-lavf-mxf
<@durandal_1707> how so?
<@jamrial> one byte changes
<@durandal_1707> jamrial: just update checksums
<@jamrial> durandal_1707: but why did they change at all? the commit you reverted didn't affect them
<@jamrial> why does reverting it affect these tests?
<@jamrial> i don't think updating the checksum without knowing what changed is a good idea
<@durandal_1707> jamrial: the lavfi core is in weird state after removal of recursive code
<@durandal_1707> jamrial: the change is that older ones would get progressive flag set and new one doesnt
<@jamrial> alright
As it gives excellent encoding gains at an insignificant speed increase
and passes fate without problems, it should now be safe to enable by
default.
Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnuker@gmail.com>
This makes sure the actual stream parameters are used, which is
important mainly for hardware decoding+filtering cases, which would
previously require various weird workarounds to handle the fact that a
fake software graph has to be constructed, but never used.
This should also improve behaviour in rare cases where
avformat_find_stream_info() does not provide accurate information.
This merges Libav commit a3a0230. It was previously skipped.
The code in flush_encoders() which sets up a "fake" format wasn't in
Libav. I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but it tends to give
behavior closer to the old one in certain corner cases.
The vp8-size-change gives different result, because now the size of
the first frame is used. libavformat reported the size of the largest
frame for some reason.
The exr tests now use the sample aspect ratio of the first frame. For
some reason libavformat determines 0/1 as aspect ratio, while the
decoder returns the correct one.
The ffm and mxf tests change the field_order values. I'm assuming
another libavformat/decoding mismatch.
Signed-off-by: wm4 <nfxjfg@googlemail.com>
According to the spec[1], a value of 0 means the footer is present and a value
of 1 means it's absent, the exact opposite of header presence flag where 1
means present and 0 absent.
The reason for this is compatibility with APEv1 tags, where there's no header,
footer presence was mandatory for all files, and the flags field was a zeroed
reserved field.
[1] http://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Ape_Tags_Flags
Reviewed-by: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
