SDL_CreateMutex can fail:
https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateMutex.
This patch makes creation more robust in one instance.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu>
In some situations, MMAL won't return a decoded frame for certain input
frames. This can happen if a frame fails to decode, or if a packet does
not actually contain a complete frame. In these situations, we would
deadlock (or actually timeout) waiting for an expected output frame,
which is not ideal. On the other hand, there are situations where we
definitely have to block to avoid deadlocks. (This mess is a
consequence of trying to map MMAL's asynchronous and flexible
dataflow to libavcodec, which is more static and rigid.)
Solve this by doing a blocking wait only if the amount of buffered data
is too big. The whole purpose of the blocking wait is to avoid excessive
buffering of input data, so we can skip it if it appears to be low. The
consequence is that libavcodec can gracefully return no frame to the
API user.
We want to track the number of full packets to make our heuristic work.
But MMAL buffers are fixed-size, requiring splitting large packets. This
is why the previous commit is needed. We use the ..._FRAME_END flag to
remember packet boundaries, but MMAL does not preserve these buffer
flags when returning buffers to the user.
Signed-off-by: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
The next commit needs 1 bit of additional information per MMAL buffer
sent to the MMAL input port. This information will be needed when the
buffer is recycled (i.e. returned by the input port's callback).
Normally, we could use MMAL_BUFFER_HEADER_FLAG_USER0, but that is
unexpectedly not preserved.
Do this by storing a pointer to FFBufferEntry in the MMAL buffer's
user data, instead of an AVBufferRef. This also changes the lifetime
of FFBufferEntry.
Signed-off-by: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
When compiled with --disable-pthreads, e.g
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20150917015044&slot=alpha-debian-qemu-gcc-4.7,
a bunch of -Wunused-functions are reported due to missing header guards
around threading related functions.
This patch should silence such warnings.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
Glibc 2.20 onwards generates a deprecation warning for usage of _BSD_SOURCE and _SVID_SOURCE.
The solution from man feature_test_macros is to define both _DEFAULT_SOURCE and the old macros.
This solution is on the lines of the one in commit af1818276e.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje@gmail.com>
SDL_CreateThread can fail:
https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateThread.
This patch makes thread creation more robust in one instance.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu>
The intended meaning is "if this block is the first block in a slice then
its left boundary is a slice boundary". Silence a logical-not-parentheses
warning from gcc.
Silence a warning due to frame assignment in dvenc. All uses of the
reference in dvdec are read only, except the ones in the main decoding
function, so use the frame pointer directly there.
Assumes 'GA94' format (ATSC standard)
Signed-off-by: DHE <git@dehacked.net>
Tested-by: Anshul <anshul.ffmpeg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Currently, errors are thrown for various macros while building that are completely bogus.
They occur during the dependency (.d) generation phase, and have no bearing on the compiled output,
since only the stdout is piped into the sed command to generate the .d files.
They basically occur as the relevant -I paths are not (and cannot be passed) during
the dependancy generation phase.
As such, this patch silences them.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
SDL_CreateMutex and SDL_CreateCond can fail:
https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateMutex.
This patch makes handling more robust in one instance.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu>
They're short enough that inlining them actually reduces code size due to
all the overhead associated with making a function call.
Signed-off-by: Anton Khirnov <anton@khirnov.net>
