Collaborators may manage issues they feel qualified to handle, being mindful of our guidelines.
Any issue and PR can be closed if they are not relevant, when in doubt leave it open for more discussion. Issues can always be re-opened if new information is made available.
If issues or PRs are very short and don't contain much information, ask for more by linking to the [issue][issue template] or [PR][pr template] template. There is also a [response guide](https://github.com/videojs/video.js/wiki/New-Issue-Response-Guide) if you're unsure.
Any code change in video.js should be happening through Pull Requests on GitHub. This includes core committers.
Before a PR is merged, it must be reviewed by at least two core committers, at least one if it comes from a core committer.
Feel free to @-mention a particular core committer if you know they are experts in the area that is being changed.
If you are unsure about the modification and cannot take responsibility for it, defer to another core committer.
Before merging the change, it should be left open for other core committers to comment on. At least 24 hours during a weekday, and the 48 hours on a weekend. Trivial changes or bug fixes that have been reviewed by multiple committers may be merged without delay.
For non-breaking changes, if there is no disagreeming between the collaborators, the PR may be landed assuming it was reviewed. If there is still disagreement, it may need to be [escalated to the TSC](#involving-the-tsc).
Bug fixes require a test case that fails beforehand and succeeds after. All code changes should contain tests and pass on the CI.
### Involving the TSC
A change or issue can be elevated to the TSC by assing the `tsc-agent` label. This should be done in the following scenarios:
* There will be a major impact on the codebase or project
* The change is inherently controversial
* No agreement was reached between collaborators participating in the discussion
The TSC will be the final arbiter when required.
## Landing a PR
Landing a PR is fairly easy given that we can use the GitHub UI for it.
When using the big green button on GitHub, make sure the "squash and merge" is selected -- it should be the only allowed option. If a PR has two features in it and should be merged as two separate commits, either ask the contributor to break it up into two, or follow the [manual steps](#landing-a-pr-manually).
The commit message should follow our [conventional changelog conventions][conventions]. They are based on the angularjs changelog conventions. The changelog is then generated from these commit messages on release.
The first line of the commit message -- the header, which is the first text box on GitHub -- should be prefixed with a type and optional scope followed by a short description of the commit.
_Optional:_ If necessary, rebase against main. If you have multiple features in the PR, [landing a PR manually with several changes](#landing-a-pr-manually-with-several-changes)
Follow the same steps as before but when you rebase against main, you want to do an interactive rebase and then squash the changes into just a few commits.
edit b4dc15d Update CONTRIBUTING.md with latest info
fixup 8592149 Add Dev certificate of origin
fixup f12af12 Add conventional-changelog-videojs link
fixup ae4613a Update node's CONTRIBUTING.md url
fixup 433c582 Update TOC
edit 259dee6 Add grunt and doctoc npm scripts
```
When you get to the edit commits, git will give more information, but you'd want to run ammend the current commit while following our commit guidelines
While `git` allows you to update the remote branch with a force push (`git push -f`). This is generally frowned upon since you're rewriting public history. However, if you just pushed the change and it's been less than 10 minutes since you've done with, you may force push to update the commit, assuming no one else has already pushed after you.
Assuming no more than 10 minutes have passed, you may force-push to update or remove the commit. If someone else has already pushed to main or 10 minutes have passed, you should instead use the revert command (`git revert`) to revert the commit and then commit the proper change, or just fix it forward with a followup commit that fixes things.
Assuming that the changes were committed, even if you lost the commit in your current history does not mean that it is lost. In a lot of cases you can still recover it from the PR branch or if all else fails look at [git's reflog](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-reflog).
This is a great time to discover that something is broken. Because it hasn't been pushed to GitHub yet, it's very easy to reset the change as if nothing has happened and try again.
This is used to make a GitHub release on videojs. You can get a token from the [personal access tokens](https://github.com/settings/tokens) page.
After generating one, make sure to keep it safe because GitHub will not show the token for you again. A good place to save it is Lastpass Secure Notes.
> This will find all tags that start with `^v6` and delete them.
At this point, you should run `npm install` because dependencies may have changed.
Then, we have a script that automates most of the steps for publishing. It's a little trickier than publishing v6.
##### Edit git-semver-tags
You'll need to edit `git-semver-tags` to support our usage of tags that are not part of the branch.
In the file `node_modules/conventional-changelog-cli/node_modules/conventional-changelog/node_modules/conventional-changelog-core/node_modules/git-semver-tags/index.js`, edit the line that says sets the `cmd` to be: