.gitignore | ||
.travis.yml | ||
driver_test.go | ||
driver.go | ||
expectations_test.go | ||
expectations.go | ||
LICENSE | ||
README.md | ||
result_test.go | ||
result.go | ||
rows_test.go | ||
rows.go | ||
sqlmock_test.go | ||
sqlmock.go | ||
statement.go | ||
stubs_test.go | ||
util_test.go | ||
util.go |
Sql driver mock for Golang
This is a mock driver as database/sql/driver which is very flexible and pragmatic to manage and mock expected queries. All the expectations should be met and all queries and actions triggered should be mocked in order to pass a test. The package has no 3rd party dependencies.
NOTE: regarding major issues #20 and #9 the api has changed to support concurrency and more than one database connection.
If you need an old version, checkout go-sqlmock at gopkg.in:
go get gopkg.in/DATA-DOG/go-sqlmock.v0
Otherwise use the v1 branch from master.
Install
go get github.com/DATA-DOG/go-sqlmock
Or take an older version:
go get gopkg.in/DATA-DOG/go-sqlmock.v0
Use it with pleasure
An example of some database interaction which you may want to test:
package main
import (
"database/sql"
_ "github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql"
"github.com/kisielk/sqlstruct"
"fmt"
"log"
)
const ORDER_PENDING = 0
const ORDER_CANCELLED = 1
type User struct {
Id int `sql:"id"`
Username string `sql:"username"`
Balance float64 `sql:"balance"`
}
type Order struct {
Id int `sql:"id"`
Value float64 `sql:"value"`
ReservedFee float64 `sql:"reserved_fee"`
Status int `sql:"status"`
}
func cancelOrder(id int, db *sql.DB) (err error) {
tx, err := db.Begin()
if err != nil {
return
}
var order Order
var user User
sql := fmt.Sprintf(`
SELECT %s, %s
FROM orders AS o
INNER JOIN users AS u ON o.buyer_id = u.id
WHERE o.id = ?
FOR UPDATE`,
sqlstruct.ColumnsAliased(order, "o"),
sqlstruct.ColumnsAliased(user, "u"))
// fetch order to cancel
rows, err := tx.Query(sql, id)
if err != nil {
tx.Rollback()
return
}
defer rows.Close()
// no rows, nothing to do
if !rows.Next() {
tx.Rollback()
return
}
// read order
err = sqlstruct.ScanAliased(&order, rows, "o")
if err != nil {
tx.Rollback()
return
}
// ensure order status
if order.Status != ORDER_PENDING {
tx.Rollback()
return
}
// read user
err = sqlstruct.ScanAliased(&user, rows, "u")
if err != nil {
tx.Rollback()
return
}
rows.Close() // manually close before other prepared statements
// refund order value
sql = "UPDATE users SET balance = balance + ? WHERE id = ?"
refundStmt, err := tx.Prepare(sql)
if err != nil {
tx.Rollback()
return
}
defer refundStmt.Close()
_, err = refundStmt.Exec(order.Value + order.ReservedFee, user.Id)
if err != nil {
tx.Rollback()
return
}
// update order status
order.Status = ORDER_CANCELLED
sql = "UPDATE orders SET status = ?, updated = NOW() WHERE id = ?"
orderUpdStmt, err := tx.Prepare(sql)
if err != nil {
tx.Rollback()
return
}
defer orderUpdStmt.Close()
_, err = orderUpdStmt.Exec(order.Status, order.Id)
if err != nil {
tx.Rollback()
return
}
return tx.Commit()
}
func main() {
db, err := sql.Open("mysql", "root:nimda@/test")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
defer db.Close()
err = cancelOrder(1, db)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
}
And the clean nice test:
package main
import (
"database/sql"
"github.com/DATA-DOG/go-sqlmock"
"testing"
"fmt"
)
// will test that order with a different status, cannot be cancelled
func TestShouldNotCancelOrderWithNonPendingStatus(t *testing.T) {
// open database stub
db, err := sqlmock.New()
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("An error '%s' was not expected when opening a stub database connection", err)
}
// columns are prefixed with "o" since we used sqlstruct to generate them
columns := []string{"o_id", "o_status"}
// expect transaction begin
sqlmock.ExpectBegin()
// expect query to fetch order and user, match it with regexp
sqlmock.ExpectQuery("SELECT (.+) FROM orders AS o INNER JOIN users AS u (.+) FOR UPDATE").
WithArgs(1).
WillReturnRows(sqlmock.NewRows(columns).FromCSVString("1,1"))
// expect transaction rollback, since order status is "cancelled"
sqlmock.ExpectRollback()
// run the cancel order function
err = cancelOrder(1, db)
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("Expected no error, but got %s instead", err)
}
// db.Close() ensures that all expectations have been met
if err = db.Close(); err != nil {
t.Errorf("Error '%s' was not expected while closing the database", err)
}
}
// will test order cancellation
func TestShouldRefundUserWhenOrderIsCancelled(t *testing.T) {
// open database stub
db, err := sqlmock.New()
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("An error '%s' was not expected when opening a stub database connection", err)
}
// columns are prefixed with "o" since we used sqlstruct to generate them
columns := []string{"o_id", "o_status", "o_value", "o_reserved_fee", "u_id", "u_balance"}
// expect transaction begin
sqlmock.ExpectBegin()
// expect query to fetch order and user, match it with regexp
sqlmock.ExpectQuery("SELECT (.+) FROM orders AS o INNER JOIN users AS u (.+) FOR UPDATE").
WithArgs(1).
WillReturnRows(sqlmock.NewRows(columns).AddRow(1, 0, 25.75, 3.25, 2, 10.00))
// expect user balance update
sqlmock.ExpectExec("UPDATE users SET balance").
WithArgs(25.75 + 3.25, 2). // refund amount, user id
WillReturnResult(sqlmock.NewResult(0, 1)) // no insert id, 1 affected row
// expect order status update
sqlmock.ExpectExec("UPDATE orders SET status").
WithArgs(ORDER_CANCELLED, 1). // status, id
WillReturnResult(sqlmock.NewResult(0, 1)) // no insert id, 1 affected row
// expect a transaction commit
sqlmock.ExpectCommit()
// run the cancel order function
err = cancelOrder(1, db)
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("Expected no error, but got %s instead", err)
}
// db.Close() ensures that all expectations have been met
if err = db.Close(); err != nil {
t.Errorf("Error '%s' was not expected while closing the database", err)
}
}
// will test order cancellation
func TestShouldRollbackOnError(t *testing.T) {
// open database stub
db, err := sqlmock.New()
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("An error '%s' was not expected when opening a stub database connection", err)
}
// expect transaction begin
sqlmock.ExpectBegin()
// expect query to fetch order and user, match it with regexp
sqlmock.ExpectQuery("SELECT (.+) FROM orders AS o INNER JOIN users AS u (.+) FOR UPDATE").
WithArgs(1).
WillReturnError(fmt.Errorf("Some error"))
// should rollback since error was returned from query execution
sqlmock.ExpectRollback()
// run the cancel order function
err = cancelOrder(1, db)
// error should return back
if err == nil {
t.Error("Expected error, but got none")
}
// db.Close() ensures that all expectations have been met
if err = db.Close(); err != nil {
t.Errorf("Error '%s' was not expected while closing the database", err)
}
}
Expectations
All Expect methods return a Mock interface which allow you to describe expectations in more details: return an error, expect specific arguments, return rows and so on. NOTE: that if you call WithArgs on a non query based expectation, it will panic
A Mock interface:
type Mock interface {
WithArgs(...driver.Value) Mock
WillReturnError(error) Mock
WillReturnRows(driver.Rows) Mock
WillReturnResult(driver.Result) Mock
}
As an example we can expect a transaction commit and simulate an error for it:
sqlmock.ExpectCommit().WillReturnError(fmt.Errorf("Deadlock occured"))
In same fashion, we can expect queries to match arguments. If there are any, it must be matched. Instead of result we can return error.
sqlmock.ExpectQuery("SELECT (.*) FROM orders").
WithArgs("string value").
WillReturnRows(sqlmock.NewRows([]string{"col"}).AddRow("val"))
NOTE: it matches a regular expression. Some regex special characters must be escaped if you want to match them. For example if we want to match a subselect:
sqlmock.ExpectQuery("SELECT (.*) FROM orders WHERE id IN \\(SELECT id FROM finished WHERE status = 1\\)").
WithArgs("string value").
WillReturnRows(sqlmock.NewRows([]string{"col"}).AddRow("val"))
WithArgs expectation, compares values based on their type, for usual values like string, float, int it matches the actual value. Types like time are compared only by type. Other types might require different ways to compare them correctly, this may be improved.
You can build rows either from CSV string or from interface values:
Rows interface, which satisfies sql driver.Rows:
type Rows interface {
AddRow(...driver.Value) Rows
FromCSVString(s string) Rows
Next([]driver.Value) error
Columns() []string
Close() error
}
Example for to build rows:
rs := sqlmock.NewRows([]string{"column1", "column2"}).
FromCSVString("one,1\ntwo,2").
AddRow("three", 3)
Prepare will ignore other expectations if ExpectPrepare not set. When set, can expect normal result or simulate an error:
rs := sqlmock.ExpectPrepare().
WillReturnError(fmt.Errorf("Query prepare failed"))
Run tests
go test
Documentation
Visit godoc See .travis.yml for supported go versions Different use case, is to functionally test with a real database - go-txdb all database related actions are isolated within a single transaction so the database can remain in the same state.
Changes
- 2014-08-16 instead of panic during reflect type mismatch when comparing query arguments - now return error
- 2014-08-14 added sqlmock.NewErrorResult which gives an option to return driver.Result with errors for interface methods, see issue
- 2014-05-29 allow to match arguments in more sophisticated ways, by providing an sqlmock.Argument interface
- 2014-04-21 introduce sqlmock.New() to open a mock database connection for tests. This method calls sql.DB.Ping to ensure that connection is open, see issue. This way on Close it will surely assert if all expectations are met, even if database was not triggered at all. The old way is still available, but it is advisable to call db.Ping manually before asserting with db.Close.
- 2014-02-14 RowsFromCSVString is now a part of Rows interface named as FromCSVString. It has changed to allow more ways to construct rows and to easily extend this API in future. See issue 1 RowsFromCSVString is deprecated and will be removed in future
Contributions
Feel free to open a pull request. Note, if you wish to contribute an extension to public (exported methods or types) - please open an issue before, to discuss whether these changes can be accepted. All backward incompatible changes are and will be treated cautiously