- **PR Description**
Applying or reverting a custom patch when one of the files contained in
the patch had unstaged modifications in the working tree would fail with
the confusing error message "does not match index", regardless of
whether those modifications conflicted with the patch or not. You would
expect this to just work if there are no conflicts, or to get the usual
conflict markers if there are. It was possible to work around this by
manually staging those files, but few people knew about this. Fix this
by staging the files (after asking for confirmation).
Also, fix a minor problem where an auto-stash for the "move patch to
index" command was forgotten to be dropped.
Unlike moving a patch to the index, applying or reverting a patch didn't
auto-stash, which means that applying a patch when there's a modified (but
unstaged) file in the working tree would error out with the message "error:
file1: does not match index", regardless of whether those modifications conflict
with the patch or not.
To fix this, we *could* add auto-stashing like we do for the "move patch to
index" command. However, in this case we rather simply stage the affected files
(after asking for confirmation). This has a few advantages:
- it only changes the staging state of those files that are contained in the
patch (whereas auto-stashing always changes all files to unstaged)
- it doesn't unnecessarily show a confirmation if none of the modified files are
affected by the patch
- if the patch conflicts with the modified files, the conflicts were "backwards"
("ours" was the patch, "theirs" the modified file); it is more logical if "ours"
is the current state of the file, and "theirs" is the patch.
It's a little unfortunate that the behavior isn't exactly the same as for "move
patch to index", but for that one we do need the auto-stash because of the
rebase that runs behind the scenes.
The tests show that this currently fails with the confusing error message "does
not match index", regardless of whether the patch conflicts with the
modifications or not. We'll improve this in the next commit.
I don't bother adding tests for reverting a patch, as the code is basically the
same as for apply.
This is functionality that works already, we only add the test for more complete
test coverage. However, there's a detail problem, and the test demonstrates
this: we keep the stash even if there was no conflict. We'll fix this next.
- **PR Description**
In the Stash panel, show information about the selected stash above the
diff of the stash in the main view. This is useful for stash entries
with very long names that are not fully visible in the Stash panel.
Fixes#4662.
Refresh is one of those functions that shouldn't require error handling (similar
to triggering a redraw of the UI, see
https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/issues/3887).
As far as I see, the only reason why Refresh can currently return an error is
that the Then function returns one. The actual refresh errors, e.g. from the git
calls that are made to fetch data, are already logged and swallowed. Most of the
Then functions do only UI stuff such as selecting a list item, and always return
nil; there's only one that can return an error (updating the rebase todo file in
LocalCommitsController.startInteractiveRebaseWithEdit); it's not a critical
error if this fails, it is only used for setting rebase todo items to "edit"
when you start an interactive rebase by pressing 'e' on a range selection of
commits. We simply log this error instead of returning it.
This was added after this PR comment:
https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/pull/3276#discussion_r1469077611
> Can we do a refresh after this reset so that the screen shows that the patch
> has been cancelled? That way, if we cancel on the next popup, the screen will
> be in a valid state.
I don't understand what "cancel on the next popup" means; there is no further
popup after this code.
- **PR Description**
This will format the `z` keyboard shortcut reference in this text in the
same way as all other keyboard shortcuts in the README.md file.
- Update the golangci-lint configuration to use the latest version
(2.2.1)
- Enable a few more linter checks
- Improve the VS Code configuration so that we don't get spurious linter
warnings that wouldn't also show up on CI
- Provide a way to run the exact same golangci-lint version locally that
we use on CI. This is useful in case the globally installed version is a
newer one which emits more warnings.
I took the set of enabled checks from revive's recommended configuration [1],
and removed some that I didn't like. There might be other useful checks in
revive that we might want to enable, but this is a nice improvement already.
The bulk of the changes here are removing unnecessary else statements after
returns, but there are a few others too.
[1] https://github.com/mgechev/revive?tab=readme-ov-file#recommended-configuration
... and configure it to run the same checks as golangci-lint.
It may seem redundant to have two linter checks enabled; however, there are
reasons to have both. golangci-lint is what we are running on CI, and it has a
lot more linters than gopls, so we want to run it locally too to get the same
coverage. The linter that is built into gopls is only staticcheck, so that's
redundant; but it has the advantage that the warnings appear a bit faster
(golangci-lint runs only on save, and with a bit of delay), and in particular it
provides quick fixes for some of the checks, which is quite convenient.
- **PR Description**
In the Tags panel, show information about the selected tag above the
commit log. This is mostly useful for annotated tags.
Fixes#4659.
- **PR Description**
Fix the problem that if the `rebase.updateRefs` git config is on, a
branch icon would appear in the commits list for the head commit as soon
as a remote or tag exists whose name is the same as the name of the
current branch.
The function would return "head/branchname" when there was either a tag or a
remote with the same name.
While fixing this we slightly change the semantic of the function (and of
determineCheckedOutBranchName, which calls it): for a detached head it now
returns an empty string rather than the commit hash. I actually think this is
better.
The icon will appear when there's a tag with the same name as the current branch
(that's what we're testing here), or even when there's a remote with the same
name. I'm not adding a test for this latter case, but this was actually how I
discovered the issue.
- **PR Description**
When GPG signing is enabled but overrideGpg is false, attempting to
reword a non-latest commit would show the "Feature not vailable for
users using GPG" error only after the user had already entered the
commit message.
Now the error is displayed immediately when attempting to start the
reword operation, before opening the editor.
Closes#4611
- **PR Description**
Similar to #2239, add credential prompts for PKCS11-based SSH keys.
OpenSSH code reference is
[here](2827b6ac30/ssh-pkcs11.c (L263)).
- **PR Description**
Moving a custom patch from the very first commit of the history to a
later commit would crash with an index-out-of-range error.
I double-checked that all other callers of
PrepareInteractiveRebaseCommand already call getBaseHashOrRoot, so this
was the only one that was broken.
I decided not to add a test for this as the scenario is not a very
common one.
Fixes#4624.
This would crash with an index-out-of-range error.
I double-checked that all other callers of PrepareInteractiveRebaseCommand
already call getBaseHashOrRoot, so this was the only one that was broken.
I decided not to add a test for this as the scenario is not a very common one.
- **PR Description**
Here's a minor cleanup: instantiate mutexes by value so that they don't
have to be initialized explicitly. It is always preferable for structs
to have a valid zero value, and this is one small step in that
direction.
I read this recommendation in the [Uber style
guide](https://github.com/uber-go/guide/blob/master/style.md#zero-value-mutexes-are-valid),
and it makes a lot of sense to me. I find most of the rest of this style
guide to be a very good read, too.
