As we just did for tasks, close their stdout pipe instead. This makes the called
process terminate more gracefully.
This isn't a change that we *need* to make, it's just a bit nicer.
Previously we would call git merge-base with the upstream branch to determine
where unpushed commits end and pushed commits start, and also git merge-base
with the main branch(es) to see where the merged commits start. This worked ok
in normal cases, but it had two problems:
- when filtering by path or by author, those merge-base commits would usually
not be part of the commit list, so we would miss the point where we should
switch from unpushed to pushed, or from pushed to merged. The consequence was
that in filtering mode, all commit hashes were always yellow.
- when main was merged into a feature branch, we would color all commits from
that merge on down in green, even ones that are only part of the feature branch
but not main.
To fix these problems, we switch our approach to one where we call git rev-list
with the branch in question, with negative refspecs for the upstream branch and
the main branches, respectively; this gives us the complete picture of which
commits are pushed/unpushed/merged, so it also works in the cases described
above.
And funnily, even though intuitively it feels more expensive, it actually
performs better than the merge-base calls (for normal usage scenarios at least),
so the commit-loading part of refresh is faster now in general. We are talking
about differences like 300ms before, 140ms after, in some unscientific
measurements I took (depends a lot on repo sizes, branch length, etc.). An
exception are degenerate cases like feature branches with hundreds of thousands
of commits, which are slower now; but I don't think we need to worry about those
too much.
This makes it easier to use the full ref in the git merge-base call, which
avoids ambiguities when there's a tag with the same name as the current branch.
This fixes a hash coloring bug in the local commits panel when there's a tag
with the same name as the checked out branch; in this case all commit hashes
that should be yellow were painted as red.
GetMergeBase is always called with a full ref, so it shouldn't need the
ignoringWarnings hack (which is about ignoring warnings coming from ambiguous
refs).
Also, separate stdout and stderr, which would also have solved the problem. We
no longer really need it now, but it's still cleaner.
Also, fix two other commands that stage all files under the hood:
- when continuing a rebase after resolving conflicts, we auto-stage all files,
but in this case we never want to include untracked files, regardless of the
filter
- likewise, pressing ctrl-f to find a base commit for fixup stages all files for
convenience, but again, this should only stage files that are already tracked
It seems that `git for-each-ref` is a lot slower than `git tag --list` when
there are thousands of tags, so revert back to the previous method, now that we
no longer use the IsAnnotated field.
This reverts commit b12b1040c3.
Storing it in the Tag struct makes loading tags a lot slower when there is a
very large number of tags; so determine it on the fly instead. On my machine,
the additional call takes under 5ms, so it seems we can afford it.
Like message, extraField can get very long (when there are thousands of tags on
a single commit), so move it to the end; this allows us to truncate overly long
lines in the output and still get all the essential fields.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Haller <stefan@haller-berlin.de>
When entering staging (or patch building) for an added or deleted file, it
doesn't make sense to use hunk mode, because pressing space would stage/unstage
the entire file, and if the user wanted to do that, they would have pressed
space in the Files panel. So always use line mode for added/deleted files by
default, even if the useHunkModeInStagingView user config is on.
Not because it's terribly important to test here (doesn't hurt though), but
because it will be useful in the next commit for a new test we're adding there.
When filtering for a file path we use the --follow option for "git log", so it
will follow renames of the file, which is great. However, if you then selected
one of the commits before a rename, you didn't see a diff, because we would pass
the original filter path to the "git show" call.
To fix this, call git log with the --name-status option when filtering by path,
so that each commit reports which file paths are touched in this commit;
remember these in the commit object, so that we can pass them to the "git show"
call later.
Be careful not to store too many such paths unnecessarily. When filtering by
folder rather than file, all these paths will necessarily be inside the original
filter path, so detect this and don't store them in this case.
There is some unfortunate code duplication between loading commits and loading
reflog commits, which I am too lazy to clean up right now.
These are very similar in that they call RunAndProcessLines on a git log command
and then process lines to create commits. Extract this into a common helper
function. At the moment this doesn't gain us much, but in the next commit we
will extend this helper function considerably with filter path logic, which
would otherwise have to be duplicated in both places.
It is good practice to use a -- argument even if no further arguments follow.
Doesn't really make a difference for this particular command though, I think.
This broke with the introduction of the age in the stashes list in bc330b8ff3
(which was included in 0.41, so 12 minor versions ago).
This makes it work again when filtering by file, but it still doesn't work when
filtering by folder (and never has). We'll fix that next.
This was not a good idea, and it seems it has never been tested: the --name-only
and -z options don't work well together. Specifically, -z seems to simply cancel
--name-only.
This is not enough to make it work, we'll need more fixes in the next commit.
This reverts commit 50044dd5e0.
At the same time, we change the defaults for both of them to "date" (they were
"recency" and "alphabetical", respectively, before). This is the reason we need
to touch so many integration tests. For some of them I decided to adapt the test
assertions to the changed sort order; for others, I added a SetupConfig step to
set the order back to "recency" so that I don't have to change what the test
does (e.g. how many SelectNextItem() calls are needed to get to a certain
branch).
When toggling the value in the UI we simply overwrite the value in UserConfig;
this would be bad if there was ever a chance that we want to write the user
config back to disk, but it is very unlikely that we can do that, because
currently we have no way to tell which parts of the config come from the global
config file and which ones come from a repo-local one.
While it's true that the behavior is a little different from the staging panel,
where the staged lines are actually removed from the view and in many cases the
selection stays more or less in the same place, it is still very useful to move
to the next stageable thing in the custom patch building view too.
This improves the experience when selecting a hunk generously with the mouse, by
dragging over it including some context lines above and below. Previously we
would consider the "moving end" of the selection range for whether things need
to be added or removed, but this doesn't make sense if it's a context line. Now
we consider the first actual change line that is included in the range.
It is confusing to get header lines, hunk headers, or context lines rendered as
being included in a custom patch, when including these makes no difference to
the patch.
This is only a visual change; internally, we still record these non-patch lines
as being included in the patch. It doesn't matter though; you can press space on
a header line and nothing happens.
It would probably be cleaner to only record + and - lines in the includedLines
array, but that would be a bit more work, and doesn't seem worth it.
I took the set of enabled checks from revive's recommended configuration [1],
and removed some that I didn't like. There might be other useful checks in
revive that we might want to enable, but this is a nice improvement already.
The bulk of the changes here are removing unnecessary else statements after
returns, but there are a few others too.
[1] https://github.com/mgechev/revive?tab=readme-ov-file#recommended-configuration
The function would return "head/branchname" when there was either a tag or a
remote with the same name.
While fixing this we slightly change the semantic of the function (and of
determineCheckedOutBranchName, which calls it): for a detached head it now
returns an empty string rather than the commit hash. I actually think this is
better.
