We forgot to convert the model indices to view indices in searchModelCommits.
This needs to be done for search results to be highlighted correctly in the
"divergence from upstream" view, which adds "--- Remote/Local ---" entries, and
during a rebase, where we have "--- Pending rebase todos ---" and "--- Commits
---" which offset view indices from model indices.
I have seen cases where during a rebase (two nonModelItems) all entries in
viewIndicesByModelIndex beyond the second nonModelItem were off by 4 rather than
2 as I would expect. The only explanation I have for this is that the function
was called concurrently.
Improve this by working on a local variable and only assign to self at the end;
this is not a real fix for the concurrency issue of course, but it makes it much
less likely to be a problem in practice.
- **PR Description**
In prompts with a suggestions panel (e.g. the "Execute shell command"
window, or the "Filter by path" panel), you can now
- scroll the list of suggestions with the mouse wheel even when the
focus is in the edit field
- click in the suggestions list or in the edit field to switch focus
between them
- double-click a suggestion to trigger it
This doesn't change behavior, just makes the code a little bit easier to
understand: the outermost condition is "do we show a popup and is the mouse
event for some other view than the focused one". Only if that's true do we need
to define the isCommitMessageView function, and check whether both views belong
to the commit message editor.
- **PR Description**
Previously, any click on an already selected line in a list view was
treated as a double click, and triggered the same action as pressing
either enter or space, depending on the view. Improve this by doing
proper double-click detection based on how much time has passed between
clicks.
Fixes#2526.
Previously a click was detected as a double-click whenever the click was on the
already selected line, regardless of how long ago the last click was (or even
when it wasn't selected by clicking at all). Now that gocui supports proper
double-click detection, we can do better.
The rationale for this is the same as in the previous commit; however, for these
functions we only allow a single controller to set them, because they are event
handlers and it doesn't make sense for multiple controllers to handle them.
Trying to do this would previously have the second one silently overwrite the
first one's.
We don't currently have this in lazygit, but I ran into the situation once
during development, and it can lead to bugs that are hard to diagnose.
Instead of holding a list of functions, we could also have added a panic in case
the function was set already; this would have been good enough for the current
state, and enough to catch mistakes early in the future. However, I decided to
allow multiple controllers to attach these functions, because I can't see a
reason not to.
These are never called on the context, they only exist to satisfy the
HasKeybindings interface. But that's wrong, HasKeybindings has nothing to do
with focus handling or rendering the main view. Remove them from that interface
and add them to IController instead.
Similar to what was done in 457cdce61d, and for the same reason.
However, instead of waiting and fixing them one by one as we see them fail, I
decided to go about it more systematically. To do that, I added calls to
`time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)` in all the Shell.Commit* helper functions; this
ensures that all the commits we make get different committer time stamps, making
all these tests fail. With this I'm pretty confident that we're good now.
When entering filtering we would only call FocusLine, which takes care of
highlighting the selected line in the commits list, but not of re-rendering the
main view. HandleFocus does that.
When exiting filtering, the HandleFocus call was missing entirely.
The tests needed to be reworked a little bit to make this testable.
Now that -committerdate is the default sort order, we could get different
results for the sort order of the branches list depending on whether the commits
on both branches have the same committer time stamp (likely in an integration
test, since git time stamps have second resolution), in which case git will fall
back to alphabetical order, or not (rare, but possible), in which case master
will have the newer commit and will come first. Make this stable by forcing the
sort order to alphabetical.
We might have more tests with this problem, we'll just have to fix them one by
one as we see them fail.
As discussed in #4602, we make a general change to how we treat UI
settings that can be changed from within lazygit; previously, the rule
was to persist them in State.yml so that they automatically remember the
last value that was set in the UI; now, we no longer do this, and
instead provide user configs for setting defaults which we fall back to
on every start.
See #4602 for an in-depth discussion about the pros and cons of either
approach, and why we chose this one.
As part of this, we change the default for the sort order of branches to
date (aka committerdate), both for local and for remote branches (was
recency and alphabetical before, respectively). See the discussion
starting
[here](https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/pull/2147#issuecomment-1656700988)
for some reasons.
Fixes#4602.
At the same time, we change the defaults for both of them to "date" (they were
"recency" and "alphabetical", respectively, before). This is the reason we need
to touch so many integration tests. For some of them I decided to adapt the test
assertions to the changed sort order; for others, I added a SetupConfig step to
set the order back to "recency" so that I don't have to change what the test
does (e.g. how many SelectNextItem() calls are needed to get to a certain
branch).
When toggling the value in the UI we simply overwrite the value in UserConfig;
this would be bad if there was ever a chance that we want to write the user
config back to disk, but it is very unlikely that we can do that, because
currently we have no way to tell which parts of the config come from the global
config file and which ones come from a repo-local one.
The version choice is a little arbitrary, but see discussion at
https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/pull/4559#issuecomment-2876201680.
The main reason why I'm updating the version now is that versions before 2.27
had a bug with branch sorting, where sorting by -committerdate (which will be
our default soon) would sort branches that point at the same commit in reverse
alphabetical order rather than alphabetical order. While this is only slightly
annoying but not a huge deal for users, it makes maintaining our integration
tests across versions very hard. So I wanted to update to at least 2.27 to get
around this problem, and went with 2.32 after the discussion linked to above.
The choice of which versions to run integration tests on is pretty arbitrary
too, I just picked some at random which are about 5 to 6 minor versions apart.
- **PR Description**
Doing a hard reset is really destructive because it loses all
uncommitted changes, so add a confirmation in case there are any.
Fixes#3085Fixes#3709Fixes#4688
It's a very common pattern in the code base to have some code that we want to
run either directly, or with a confirmation, depending on some condition. In
most cases this is solved by creating a local helper function that we call
either directly or from within the HandleConfirm of the confirmation; provide a
convenience helper that makes this easier.
These were found by commenting out the initialization of the struct literal in
EnglishTranslationSet.TranslationSet(), and then running
$ punused pkg/i18n/**/*.go
Punused can be installed with `go install github.com/bep/punused@latest`.
The code was copied from StagingController in 0496e3af50, and I did add the new
text in that commit, I just forgot to adapt the code to actually use it.
- **PR Description**
If the hunk to be selected was partially scrolled offscreen, the view wouldn't
scroll enough to make it completely visible (the last line of the hunk was still
offscreen).
If the hunk to be selected was partially scrolled offscreen, the view wouldn't
scroll enough to make it completely visible (the last line of the hunk was still
offscreen).
This is only a minimal fix for a pressing problem. The code to handle scrolling
after selection changes has lots of problems, and is also inconsistent between
list views and the patch explorer, but cleaning this up needs more time than I
have right now.
Globally ignoring all dot files and then making exceptions as needed to pull
files back in again is very error prone. It's better to explicitly exclude
everything we want to hide.
The reason why this came up is that I tried to look at the git history of one of
the files in .github/workflows/ using lazygit's path filtering feature, but it
didn't show up in the list of suggestions. It took me a while to realize that
that's because this list doesn't show git-ignored files. Now, .github/workflows/
wasn't really git-ignored because it was brought back by an exclamation mark
entry in the Exceptions section; but maybe the library we are using to get the
files doesn't handle these properly or something (I didn't further research
this).
Globally ignoring all dot files and then making exceptions as needed to pull
files back in again is very error prone. It's better to explicitly exclude
everything we want to hide.
This can be seen in the vendor directory, where we omitted a lot of files
accidentally (we'll fix that in the next commit). None of these were important,
so no harm done, but still.
The reason why this came up is that I tried to look at the git history of one of
the files in .github/workflows/ using lazygit's path filtering feature, but it
didn't show up in the list of suggestions. It took me a while to realize that
that's because this list doesn't show git-ignored files. Now, .github/workflows/
wasn't really git-ignored because it was brought back by an exclamation mark
entry in the Exceptions section; but maybe the library we are using to get the
files doesn't handle these properly or something (I didn't further research
this).
The core homebrew formular is usually up to date very quickly, so
there's little reason to use the custom tap.
We still maintain the tap and update it for the benefit of users who
already subscribed to it, but we no longer recommend it for new users.
The core homebrew formular is usually up to date very quickly, so there's little
reason to use the custom tap.
We still maintain the tap and update it for the benefit of users who already
subscribed to it, but we no longer recommend it.
- **PR Description**
Make the action run only in my fork, so that releases appear to be
created by me.
Also, update goreleaser to the latest version, and some other tweaks.
As far as I can tell, this is the only way to make sure that releases show up as
created by me. Also, we totally don't want it to run in other people's forks
(although it would likely just have failed there, but still).
The restriction only applies to scheduled runs; manually triggering the action
is still possible from everywhere. There needs to be a personal access token
named LAZYGIT_RELEASE_PAT configured on the repo for this to work, though.
- **PR Description**
This PR fixes the broken markdown table formatting in the auto-generated
keybindings documentation files by properly escaping newlines in
tooltips.
Issue: https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/issues/4689
- **PR Description**
As of #4684, hunk mode has become so useful that I prefer it over line
mode now. This PR adds a config that lets you use hunk mode by default
in the staging view.
I'm not enabling this by default yet, although I do think it's the more
useful mode for most people. The biggest issue that I still have with
this is that _if_ you need to switch to line mode for some reason, then
it's very non-obvious how to do that. New users might not find out at
all, and think that lazygit doesn't allow staging individual lines.
- **PR Description**
Hunk selection mode is one of the features that many people don't know
about, because it is not very discoverable. You can switch to it from
line selection mode by pressing `a` in the staging view.
The problem with this mode is that it selects entire hunks, where hunks
are defined to be sections of the diff starting with `@@`. Very often,
hunks consist of multiple distinct blocks of changes, separated by
context lines. For example, with the default diff context size of 3 it
takes at least 6 unchanged lines between blocks of changes for them to
be separated into distinct hunks; if there are 5 or less unchanged lines
between them, they are grouped into one hunk. And of course, if you
increase the diff context size by pressing `}`, you will get even fewer
hunks.
Now, most of the time I want to navigate between the individual blocks
of changes in a diff, regardless of how git groups them into hunks.
That's what this PR does: when pressing `a`, the selection is extended
to just the current group of changes, separated by context lines; you
can easily stage it by pressing space, and the selection will move on to
the next block of changes. Actual hunks no longer play a role here.
Also, in line selection mode the right/left arrow keys now move between
blocks of changes rather than actual hunks.
I find this new behavior so useful that I almost always switch to hunk
mode right away after entering the staging view. It saves a lot of
keystrokes, since it is very rare that I want to select only some lines
of a block of adjacent changes. This makes me wonder whether we should
enable hunk mode by default when entering staging, but that's going to
be another PR.
It's annoyingly slow, and there is a separate task for generating the list if
needed.
Also, clear the terminal before running the test; this makes it easier to see
the results of the last test run.
We only want to do this when the function is called from the remote branches
panel. It can also be called with a selection of local branches in order to
delete their remote branches, but in this case the selection shouldn't be
collapsed because the local branches stay around.
We had code already that was supposed to do this, but it didn't work. It should
have used SetSelection() instead of SetSelectedLineIdx(); the latter doesn't
actually cancel a range selection.
Introduce a new function specifically for collapsing the range after deleting
multiple items, so that clients don't need two calls (we'll add a bunch more in
this branch).
- **PR Description**
While it's true that the behavior is a little different from the staging
panel, where the staged lines are actually removed from the view and in
many cases the selection stays more or less in the same place, it is
still very useful to move to the next stageable thing in the custom
patch building view too.
Also, we change the visualization of what's included in the patch to
mark only the + and - lines of the patch; for all other lines it doesn't
make a difference whether they are included.
And finally, we make it so that only + and - lines are considered when
pressing space; previously it would also look at selected context lines,
which doesn't make much sense. This improves the experience for mouse
users who like to generously select hunks by dragging across them,
including some context lines above and below.
While it's true that the behavior is a little different from the staging panel,
where the staged lines are actually removed from the view and in many cases the
selection stays more or less in the same place, it is still very useful to move
to the next stageable thing in the custom patch building view too.
This improves the experience when selecting a hunk generously with the mouse, by
dragging over it including some context lines above and below. Previously we
would consider the "moving end" of the selection range for whether things need
to be added or removed, but this doesn't make sense if it's a context line. Now
we consider the first actual change line that is included in the range.
It is confusing to get header lines, hunk headers, or context lines rendered as
being included in a custom patch, when including these makes no difference to
the patch.
This is only a visual change; internally, we still record these non-patch lines
as being included in the patch. It doesn't matter though; you can press space on
a header line and nothing happens.
It would probably be cleaner to only record + and - lines in the includedLines
array, but that would be a bit more work, and doesn't seem worth it.
- **PR Description**
For cherry-picking, this used to work in earlier versions, but it broke
in #4443. For reverting, it was never supported.
Also, we add some minor improvements while we're at it, such as slightly
better names for the auto-stashes that are created for the various
operations (so that, if an auto-stash pop fails and the stash is kept
around, you can tell more easily what it was for). Also, we now adjust
the selection of the commits list after cherry-picking, so that the same
commit stays selected.
CheckMergeOrRebase calls Refresh already. However, it does an async refresh by
default, so we must turn this into a sync refresh so that moving the selection
down by one works even for the very first commit in history. Also, we must add
an explicit call to FocusLine so that the view selection is in sync with the
model selection; previously this was taken care of by the PostRefreshUpdate call
that happens as part of a refresh.
Keep the same commit selected, by moving the selection down by the number of
cherry-picked commits. We also do this when reverting commits, and it is
possible now that we use a sync waiting status.
We also need to turn the refresh that happens as part of CheckMergeOrRebase into
a sync one, so that the commits list is up to date and the new selection isn't
clamped.
We are about to change the selection behavior when cherry-picking, and it's good
to have tests that document in what way it changes in the next commit.
Stefan Haller
