You've already forked comprehensive-rust
mirror of
https://github.com/google/comprehensive-rust.git
synced 2025-06-26 18:51:00 +02:00
This is the result of running `dprint fmt` after removing `src/` from the list of excluded directories. This also reformats the Rust code: we might want to tweak this a bit in the future since some of the changes removes the hand-formatting. Of course, this formatting can be seen as a mis-feature, so maybe this is good overall. Thanks to mdbook-i18n-helpers 0.2, the POT file is nearly unchanged after this, meaning that all existing translations remain valid! A few messages were changed because of stray whitespace characters: msgid "" "Slices always borrow from another object. In this example, `a` has to remain " -"'alive' (in scope) for at least as long as our slice. " +"'alive' (in scope) for at least as long as our slice." msgstr "" The formatting is enforced in CI and we will have to see how annoying this is in practice for the many contributors. If it becomes annoying, we should look into fixing dprint/check#11 so that `dprint` can annotate the lines that need fixing directly, then I think we can consider more strict formatting checks. I added more customization to `rustfmt.toml`. This is to better emulate the dense style used in the course: - `max_width = 85` allows lines to take up the full width available in our code blocks (when taking margins and the line numbers into account). - `wrap_comments = true` ensures that we don't show very long comments in the code examples. I edited some comments to shorten them and avoid unnecessary line breaks — please trim other unnecessarily long comments when you see them! Remember we're writing code for slides 😄 - `use_small_heuristics = "Max"` allows for things like struct literals and if-statements to take up the full line width configured above. The formatting settings apply to all our Rust code right now — I think we could improve this with https://github.com/dprint/dprint/issues/711 which lets us add per-directory `dprint` configuration files. However, the `inherit: true` setting is not yet implemented (as far as I can tell), so a nested configuration file will have to copy most or all of the top-level file.
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
minutes
minutes |
---|
15 |
Generic Data Types
You can use generics to abstract over the concrete field type:
#[derive(Debug)]
struct Point<T> {
x: T,
y: T,
}
impl<T> Point<T> {
fn coords(&self) -> (&T, &T) {
(&self.x, &self.y)
}
// fn set_x(&mut self, x: T)
}
fn main() {
let integer = Point { x: 5, y: 10 };
let float = Point { x: 1.0, y: 4.0 };
println!("{integer:?} and {float:?}");
println!("coords: {:?}", integer.coords());
}
-
Q: Why
T
is specified twice inimpl<T> Point<T> {}
? Isn't that redundant?- This is because it is a generic implementation section for generic type. They are independently generic.
- It means these methods are defined for any
T
. - It is possible to write
impl Point<u32> { .. }
.Point
is still generic and you can usePoint<f64>
, but methods in this block will only be available forPoint<u32>
.
-
Try declaring a new variable
let p = Point { x: 5, y: 10.0 };
. Update the code to allow points that have elements of different types, by using two type variables, e.g.,T
andU
.