1
0
mirror of https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep.git synced 2025-04-24 17:12:16 +02:00

regex: fix a perf bug when using -w flag

When looking for an inner literal to speed up searches, if only a prefix
is found, then we generally give up doing inner literal optimizations since
the regex engine will generally handle it for us. Unfortunately, this
decision was being made *before* we wrap the regex in (^|\W)...($|\W) when
using the -w/--word-regexp flag, which would then defeat the literal
optimizations inside the regex engine.

We fix this with a bit of a hack that says, "if we're doing a word regexp,
then give me back any literal you find, even if it's a prefix."
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Gallant 2019-04-05 21:02:47 -04:00
parent 254b8b67bb
commit 9f15e3b671
2 changed files with 13 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ impl ConfiguredHIR {
if self.config.line_terminator.is_none() {
return Ok(None);
}
match LiteralSets::new(&self.expr).one_regex() {
match LiteralSets::new(&self.expr).one_regex(self.config.word) {
None => Ok(None),
Some(pattern) => self.pattern_to_regex(&pattern).map(Some),
}

View File

@ -47,18 +47,23 @@ impl LiteralSets {
/// generated these literal sets. The idea here is that the pattern
/// returned by this method is much cheaper to search for. i.e., It is
/// usually a single literal or an alternation of literals.
pub fn one_regex(&self) -> Option<String> {
pub fn one_regex(&self, word: bool) -> Option<String> {
// TODO: The logic in this function is basically inscrutable. It grew
// organically in the old grep 0.1 crate. Ideally, it would be
// re-worked. In fact, the entire inner literal extraction should be
// re-worked. Actually, most of regex-syntax's literal extraction
// should also be re-worked. Alas... only so much time in the day.
if self.prefixes.all_complete() && !self.prefixes.is_empty() {
debug!("literal prefixes detected: {:?}", self.prefixes);
// When this is true, the regex engine will do a literal scan,
// so we don't need to return anything.
return None;
if !word {
if self.prefixes.all_complete() && !self.prefixes.is_empty() {
debug!("literal prefixes detected: {:?}", self.prefixes);
// When this is true, the regex engine will do a literal scan,
// so we don't need to return anything. But we only do this
// if we aren't doing a word regex, since a word regex adds
// a `(?:\W|^)` to the beginning of the regex, thereby
// defeating the regex engine's literal detection.
return None;
}
}
// Out of inner required literals, prefixes and suffixes, which one
@ -285,7 +290,7 @@ mod tests {
}
fn one_regex(pattern: &str) -> Option<String> {
sets(pattern).one_regex()
sets(pattern).one_regex(false)
}
// Put a pattern into the same format as the one returned by `one_regex`.