Signed-off-by: Michael Bradshaw <mbradshaw@sorensonmedia.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Ross <pross@xvid.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
This function is always called with a non-negative argument, so
those special cases are not needed. In the places the argument
might be zero, the return value for a zero argument does not matter
since it would then be used to scale an array full of zeros.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Note that the symbols used to run the hardware decoder in asynchronous mode
have been marked deprecated and will be dropped at a future version bump.
Signed-off-by: Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>
There are several reasons for doing that:
1. It documents the code for the reader and helps find
inconsistencies and bugs.
2. For rej_perms, it guarantees the change will be done
even if the output reference can be created by several
code paths.
3. It can be used to predict cases where a copy will,
or will not happen and optimize buffer allocation
(for example not request a rare direct-rendering buffer
from a device sink if it will be copied anyway).
Note that a filter is still allowed to manage the permissions
on its own without using these fields.
The resolution is in the packets, so decoding must happen.
Since most other formats do not set the dimension, make it
a special case for PGS. If other codecs were to have the
same requirement, using a CODEC_CAP would be preferred.
DVD subtitles packets can only encode a single rectangle:
if there are several, copy them into a big transparent one.
DVD subtitles rely on an external 16-colors palette:
use a reasonable default one, stored in the private context,
and encode it into the extradata, as specified by Matroska.
TODO: allow to change the palette with an option.
Each packet can use four colors out of the global palette.
The old logic was to map transparent colors to the color 0
and all other colors to 3, 2, 1, cyclically in descending
frequency order, completely disregarding the original color.
Select the "best" four colors from the global palette, according
to heuristics based on frequency, opacity and brightness, and
arrange them in standard DVD order: background, foreground,
outline, other.
TODO: select the alpha value more finely; see if CHG_COLCON can
allow more than 4 colors per packet.
Reference:
http://dvd.sourceforge.net/dvdinfo/spu.html
With these changes, dvdsubenc can be used to transcode DVB subtitles
and get a very decent result.
Note that the symbols used to run the hardware decoder in asynchronous mode
has been marked as deprecated and will be dropped at a future version dump.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
To access data at multiple fixed offsets from a base address, this
code uses a single "m" operand and code of the form "32%0", relying on
the memory operand instantiation having no displacement, giving a final
result of the form "32(%rax)". If the compiler uses a register and
displacement, e.g. "64(%rax)", the end result becomes "3264(%rax)",
which obviously does not work.
Replacing the "m" operands with "r" operands allows safe addition of a
displacement. In theory, multiple memory operands could use a shared
base register with different index registers, "(%rax,%rbx)", potentially
making more efficient use of registers. In the cases at hand, no such
sharing is possible since the addresses involved are entirely unrelated.
After this change, the code somewhat rudely accesses memory without
using a corresponding memory operand, which in some cases can lead to
unwanted "optimisations" of surrounding code. However, the original
code also accesses memory not covered by a memory operand, so this is
not adding any defect not already present. It is also hightly unlikely
that any such optimisations could be performed here since the memory
locations in questions are not accessed elsewhere in the same functions.
This fixes crashes with suncc.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Under some circumstances, suncc will use a single register for the
address of all memory operands, inserting lea instructions loading
the correct address prior to each memory operand being used in the
code. In the yadif code, the branch in the asm block bypasses such
an lea instruction, causing an incorrect address to be used in the
following load.
This patch replaces the tmpX arrays with a single array and uses a
register operand to hold its address. Although this prevents using
offsets from the stack pointer to access these locations, the code
still builds as 32-bit PIC even with old compilers.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
This fixes two issues preventing suncc from building this code.
The undocumented 'a' operand modifier, causing gcc to omit a $ in
front of immediate operands (as required in addresses), is not
supported by suncc. Luckily, the also undocumented 'c' modifer
has the same effect and is supported.
On some asm statements with a large number of operands, suncc for no
obvious reason fails to correctly substitute some of the operands.
Fortunately, some of the operands in these statements are plain
numbers which can be inserted directly into the code block instead
of passed as operands.
With these changes, the code builds correctly with both gcc and
suncc.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
This code contains a C array of addresses of labels defined in
inline asm. To do this, the names must be declared as external
in C. The declared type does not matter since only the address is
used, and for some reason, the author of the code used the 'void'
type despite taking the address of a void expression being invalid.
Changing the type to char, a reasonable choice since the alignment
of the code labels cannot be known or guaranteed, eliminates gcc
warnings and allows building with suncc.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
many branches and cases of scale_vector are irrelevant for the case here
and by inlining they can be reliably removed.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
It appears someone thinks this special case can be reached
Well, it cannot, thus not only do we not need to optimize it
we dont need it at all
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
