Texinfo 7.0 produces quite different HTML to Texinfo 6.8. Without
this change, enumerated option flags (i.e. Possible values of x
are...) render as white text on a white background with Texinfo 7.0
and are unreadable. This change removes a style for the selector
`.table .table` which causes the background to turn white for these
elements. As far as I can tell, it is not actually used anywhere in
files generated by Texinfo 6.8.
Signed-off-by: Frank Plowman <post@frankplowman.com>
Resolves trac ticket #10636 (http://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10636).
Texinfo 7.0, released in November 2022, changed the names of various
functions. Compiling docs with Texinfo 7.0 resulted in warnings and
improperly formatted documentation. More old names appear to have
been removed in Texinfo 7.1, released October 2023, which causes docs
compilation to fail.
This commit addresses the issue by adding logic to switch between the old
and new function names depending on the Texinfo version. Texinfo 6.8
produces identical documentation before and after the patch.
CC
https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1938238.htmlhttps://bugs.gentoo.org/916104
Signed-off-by: Frank Plowman <post@frankplowman.com>
By intent, and in practice, the "active contributor" criterion applies
to the person authoring the commits, not the one pushing them into the
repository.
When operating on large blocks of data it's common to repeatedly use
an instruction on multiple registers. Using the REPX macro makes it
easy to quickly write dense code to achieve this without having to
explicitly duplicate the same instruction over and over.
For example,
REPX {paddw x, m4}, m0, m1, m2, m3
REPX {mova [r0+16*x], m5}, 0, 1, 2, 3
will expand to
paddw m0, m4
paddw m1, m4
paddw m2, m4
paddw m3, m4
mova [r0+16*0], m5
mova [r0+16*1], m5
mova [r0+16*2], m5
mova [r0+16*3], m5
Commit taken from x264:
6d10612ab0
Signed-off-by: Frank Plowman <post@frankplowman.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Khirnov <anton@khirnov.net>
Partially fixes ticket #798
Reviewed-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Reviewed-by: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Ross <pross@xvid.org>
This uses a more traditional approach allowing up processing of up to
period minus two elements per iteration. This also allows the algorithm
to work for all and any vector length.
As the T-Head C908 device under test can load 16 elements loop, there is
unsurprisingly a little performance drop when the period is minimal and
the parallelism is capped at 13 elements:
Before:
postfilter_15_c: 21222.2
postfilter_15_rvv_f32: 22007.7
postfilter_512_c: 20189.7
postfilter_512_rvv_f32: 22004.2
postfilter_1022_c: 20189.7
postfilter_1022_rvv_f32: 22004.2
After:
postfilter_15_c: 20189.5
postfilter_15_rvv_f32: 7057.2
postfilter_512_c: 20189.5
postfilter_512_rvv_f32: 5667.2
postfilter_1022_c: 20192.7
postfilter_1022_rvv_f32: 5667.2
As in the aligned case, we can use VLSE64.V, though the way of doing so
gets more convoluted, so the performance gains are more modest:
get_pixels_unaligned_c: 126.7
get_pixels_unaligned_rvv_i32: 145.5 (before)
get_pixels_unaligned_rvv_i64: 62.2 (after)
For the reference, those are the aligned benchmarks (unchanged) on the
same T-Head C908 hardware:
get_pixels_c: 126.7
get_pixels_rvi: 85.7
get_pixels_rvv_i64: 33.2
Without this flag, timestamps were embedded into the final
binary if CUDA was enabled.
Signed-off-by: Rob Hall <robxnanocode@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Khirnov <anton@khirnov.net>
We currently mostly do not empty the MMX state in our MMX
DSP functions; instead we only do so before code that might
be using x87 code. This is a violation of the System V i386 ABI
(and maybe of other ABIs, too):
"The CPU shall be in x87 mode upon entry to a function. Therefore,
every function that uses the MMX registers is required to issue an
emms or femms instruction after using MMX registers, before returning
or calling another function." (See 2.2.1 in [1])
This patch does not intend to change all these functions to abide
by the ABI; it only does so for ff_pixelutils_sad_8x8_mmxext, as this
function can by called by external users, because it is exported
via the pixelutils API. Without this, the following fragment will
assert (on x86/x64):
uint8_t src1[8 * 8], src2[8 * 8];
av_pixelutils_sad_fn fn = av_pixelutils_get_sad_fn(3, 3, 0, NULL);
fn(src1, 8, src2, 8);
av_assert0_fpu();
[1]: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/hjl-tools/x86-psABI/intel386-psABI-1.1.pdf
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
Fixes: out of array write
Fixes: 63520/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODEC_ID_FLIC_fuzzer-4876198087622656
Regression since: c7f8d42c12 (was not posted to ffmpeg-devel)
Found-by: continuous fuzzing process https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/ffmpeg
Reviewed-by: Sean McGovern <gseanmcg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Reviewed-by: Sean McGovern <gseanmcg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Reviewed-by: Sean McGovern <gseanmcg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
This is cleaner, but it is also a workaround for when
the header exists, but cannot be compiled.
This will happen when the compiler has no inline asm
support.
Possibly the configure check should be improved as well.
The test can currently pass when _Pragma is not supported, since
_Pragma might be treated as a implicitly declared function.
This happens e.g. with tinycc.
Extending the check to 2 pragmas both matches the actual use
better and avoids this misdetection.
Fixes ticket #10638 (and should also fix ticket #10482)
by restoring the behaviour from before
3c7dd5ed37.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
The `-caption_encoding` option was reported as having a default value of
'ass', whereas it's actually 'auto'.
Signed-off-by: zheng qian <xqq@xqq.im>
Signed-off-by: Gyan Doshi <ffmpeg@gyani.pro>
With 128-bit vectors, this is mostly pointless but also harmless.
Performance gains should be more noticeable with larger vector sizes.
neg_odd_64_c: 76.2
neg_odd_64_rvv_i64: 74.7
