This is possible now that the next-API is gone.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
They are not allowed outside of functions. Fixes the warning
"ISO C does not allow extra ‘;’ outside of a function [-Wpedantic]"
when compiling with GCC and -pedantic.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@gmail.com>
AVFilterLink.frame_count is supposed to count the number of frames
that were passed on the link, but with min_samples, that number is
not always the same for the source and destination filters.
With the addition of a FIFO on the link, the difference will become
more significant.
Split the variable in two: frame_count_in counts the number of
frames that entered the link, frame_count_out counts the number
of frames that were sent to the destination filter.
2.5x faster for 8-bit mode without autovectorization in GCC, 2x
slower with it on x86. However, since the platforms we enable GCC
autovectorization on most probably has support for SSE2
optimization (added in the subsequent commit), this commit should
in general do good.
Libav, for some reason, merged this as a public API function. This will
aid in future merges.
A define is left for backwards compat, just in case some person
used it, since it is in a public header.
Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com>
It is well known that fabs and fabsf are at least as fast and sometimes
faster than the FFABS macro, at least on the gcc+glibc combination.
For instance, see the reference:
http://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/6735/.
This was a patch to glibc in order to remove their usages of a macro.
The reason essentially boils down to fabs using the __builtin_fabs of
the compiler, while FFABS needs to infer to not use a branch and to
simply change the sign bit. Usually the inference works, but sometimes
it does not. This may be easily checked by looking at the asm.
This also has the added benefit of reducing macro usage, which has
problems with side-effects.
Note that avcodec is not handled here, as it is huge and
most things there are integer arithmetic anyway.
Tested with FATE.
Reviewed-by: Clément Bœsch <u@pkh.me>
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
