In all other menus besides the keybindings menu it makes sense to hide
keybindings that match the confirmMenu binding. This is important to make it
clear which action will be triggered when you press the key.
In the keybindings menu this is different; the main purpose of that menu is not
to allow triggering commands by their key while the menu is open, but to serve
as a reference for what the keybindings are when it is not open. Because of
this, it is more important to show all bindings in this menu, even if they
conflict with the confirmMenu key.
This fixes a regression introduced in b3a3410a1a.
This is needed when remapping the confirmMenu key to, say, "y", and there's a
menu that has an item with a "y" binding. This already worked correctly (confirm
takes precedence, as desired), but it's still confusing to see the item binding.
It seems useful to have the flexibility to remap "enter" in confirmations to
"y", but keep "enter" for menus and suggestions (even though we sometimes use
menus as confirmations, but it's still good to give users the choice).
This one doesn't make a difference in practice because we don't remap the key in
tests, but if we would, then this would no longer work correctly. It's just more
correct this way.
The universal.confirm keybinding is the wrong one to use for this, we want
universal.goInto instead. They are both bound to "enter" by default, but when
remapping confirm to "y" we don't want to use that for entering worktrees.
Rebinding the universal.confirm keybinding currently doesn't make sense, because
the rebound key would also be used for editable prompts, which means you would
only be able to bind it to a ctrl key (not "y", which is desirable for some
people), and also it would allow you to enter a line feed in a branch name.
Fix this by always using enter for editable prompts.
So far, confirmations and prompts were handled by the same view, context, and
controller, with a bunch of conditional code based on whether the view is
editable. This was more or less ok so far, since it does save a little bit of
code duplication; however, now we need separate views, because we don't have
dynamic keybindings, but we want to map "confirm" to different keys in
confirmations (the "universal.confirm" user config) and prompts (hard-coded to
enter, because it doesn't make sense to customize it there).
It also allows us to get rid of the conditional code, which is a nice benefit;
and the code duplication is actually not *that* bad.
To fix the problem described in the previous commit, iterate backwards over the
stashes that we want to delete. This allows us to use their Index field.
The test shows that we are currently auto-forwarding branches even if they are
checked out by another worktree; this is quite bad, because when you switch to
that other worktree you'll see that the files that are touched by the fetched
commits are all modified (which we don't test here).
This is similar to using lazygit's Git.Paging.ExternalDiffCommand config, except
that the command is configured in git. This can be done either with git's
`diff.external` config, or through .gitattributes, so it gives a bit more
flexibility.
Many people don't understand what this means, which is apparent from the amount
of issues that got filed because of this. Let's get rid of it to avoid this
confusion. People will have to configure their pager twice if they want to use
it both on the command line and in lazygit, which I think is not a big deal.
This was needed in an earlier version of the test, when we asserted the file
content in a more complicated way. It should have been removed in caca62b89e.
This frees up ctrl-z for suspend. Hopefully, redo is not such a frequently used
operation that the change annoys people.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Haller <stefan@haller-berlin.de>
In some cases we set a disabled reason but leave the text empty, so that we
don't get an error toast when the item is invoked. In such a case it looks
awkward if there is a tooltip showing "Disabled: " with no following text.
For many menus, just "Close" is fine, but some menus act more like confirmations
(e.g. the menu that appears when you cherry-pick and get conflicts); in this
case, it's good to make it more obvious that hitting esc cancels the whole
thing.
Dismissing a range selection is handled by the global escape handler for all
list views, but not for the staging and patch building views, so we need to make
the esc description dynamic for these, too.
The main reason for this is that sometimes the escape key is handled by a local
binding, in which case it appears before the '?' binding in the options status
bar, and other times it is handled by the global controller, in which case it
appeared after. Moving it to before the keybindings menu handler makes it appear
before '?' in both cases.
Also, if the window is too narrow to show all keybindings, the ones that don't
fit will be truncated, and in this case it is more important to show the esc
binding because of its context sensitivity.
This also moves the esc entry up a few positions in the keybindings menu, but I
don't think this matters much.
Sometimes there is a local and a global keybinding for the same key; if both are
configured to be shown in the options map, we should only show the local one
because it takes precedence. This happens for example for <esc> in a popup, or
for <esc> in the focused main view.
Note that this is also a problem in the keybindings menu, and we don't solve
that here.
It's maybe not totally obvious, so let's show it.
Esc now appears twice in the status bar, because the global controller also
appends its generic "Cancel". We'll fix this in the next commit.
An example for this can be seen in the next commit.
We make this a setter rather than an added constructor argument so that we don't
have to change all those contexts that don't want to make use of this.
This assertion didn't test anything useful, given that the filtered view already
has two lines. This should have been adapted in 9f0b4d0000 when we added
section headers while filtering.
The previous commit already fixed the user-visible lag, but there's still a
problem with multiple background git processes consuming resources calculating
diffs that we are never going to show. Improve this by terminating those
processes (by sending them a TERM signal).
Unfortunately this is only possible on Linux and Mac, so Windows users will have
to live with the higher CPU usage. The recommended workaround is to not use
"diff.algorithm = histogram".
