currently, the model outputs the rain, and so need a subtraction
in filter c code to get the final derain result.
I've sent a PR to update the model file and accepted, see at
https://github.com/XueweiMeng/derain_filter/pull/3
Signed-off-by: Guo, Yejun <yejun.guo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Liu <lq@chinaffmpeg.org>
The Y channel is handled by dnn, and also resized by dnn. The UV channels
are resized with swscale.
The command to use espcn.pb (see vf_sr) looks like:
./ffmpeg -i 480p.jpg -vf format=yuv420p,dnn_processing=dnn_backend=tensorflow:model=espcn.pb:input=x:output=y -y tmp.espcn.jpg
Signed-off-by: Guo, Yejun <yejun.guo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pedro Arthur <bygrandao@gmail.com>
Only the Y channel is handled by dnn, the UV channels are copied
without changes.
The command to use srcnn.pb (see vf_sr) looks like:
./ffmpeg -i 480p.jpg -vf format=yuv420p,scale=w=iw*2:h=ih*2,dnn_processing=dnn_backend=tensorflow:model=srcnn.pb:input=x:output=y -y srcnn.jpg
Signed-off-by: Guo, Yejun <yejun.guo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pedro Arthur <bygrandao@gmail.com>
As we find ourselves wanting a way to transfer frames between
HW devices (or more realistically, between APIs on the same device),
it's desirable to have a way to describe the relationship. While
we could imagine introducing a `hwtransfer` filter, there is
almost no difference from `hwupload`. The main new feature we need
is a way to specify the target device. Having a single device
for the filter chain is obviously insufficient if we're dealing
with two devices.
So let's add a way to specify the upload target device, and if none
is specified, continue with the existing behaviour.
We must also correctly preserve the sw_format on such a transfer.
There was no consensus about separating AVExprState from AVExpr so here is a
minimal patch using the existing AVExpr to fix ticket #7528.
Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu>
